|
You Tell Me
From John Good for Left
in Aboite
Saturday. . .Sunday. . .Mudvein.
.err. .Monday! Sorry - this picture threw me off crack, err. .track, for a
second there. . .I'm wondering what the charges were and who was behind
this incident! But, on Mondays, YOU, faithful reader, get to play judge
and juror, so. . .CAPTION THIS PHOTO:

Rudenac The Maleficent
From Darkblack

Whatever the question, the
answer will always be... September
11th.
The Resurrection of Myanmar Yellow Blood
Revolution
From Aung Way for Burmese
Bloggers Without Borders
We,
the Mass's Alliance for Democracy, try to resuscitate the idea for our
“saffron solidarity – yellow blood” revolution 2007.
We will bring our pro-democracy movement in three ways. Those are
following:
(1) Military way (way of mutiny)
(2) Diplomatic way (way of diplomacy)
(3) Propaganda way (way of counter-art)
(1)
Military way (way of mutiny)
We want friendship between our army and our protesters.
We must know the soldiers. We must organize the soldiers. We must urge
them to save the people and sanghas and students.
We understand that next “third and last” revolution is going to be led
by the soldiers who love their country and their army. They will be
revolutionary forces for democracy soon.
In our history, it'll be soldiers-led, 2007 (or) 2008 … and previous
were students-led, 1988 and sanghas-led, 2007.
We hope there will be “three Ss” combination – soldiers, sanghas and
students. “Three Ss” means, in myanmar language, “thar thone thar”
(three kinds of son)
1. Kyaung thar – son of school = student
2. Phayar thar – son of Buddha = sangha
3. Sit thar (Tatmadaw thar) = soldier
We hope, in Myanmar army, a mutiny will be followed soon.
(2) Diplomatic way (way of diplomacy)
Why is the voice of Indian democracy silent about momentous struggle for
liberty and rights in Myanmar? And also, why is the voice of Russians and
Chinese?
We recognize, in China, Russia and India, their governments are different
from their people.Those three governments are usual supporters of Myanmar
military regime. Myanmar generals are backed by those three foreign
governments. But those people of those countries are opposite of their
governments.
We try, diplomatically, those people, to condemn their own governments,
supporting for Myanmar government and persuade to halt it urgently.
(3) Propaganda way (way of counter-art)
We use some methods of – “Psycu-war to Psych-war”. (Psychological
warfare)
We must criticize all their writings in the government mouth-piece
newspapers.
We should requite all their policy media work and pro-junta art.
We will attack the enemy propaganda.
We drive them into trouble mud.
Their propaganda campaign in crisis must be broken down.
And then, most important thing we face is just to do record exactly and
write down detail the lists (names and bio-datas) of Union Solidarity and
Development Association's members and its villains those who, together
with military bulldogs and security polices, cracked down on the
pro-democracy protesters during August-September 2007 movement.
We believe, the revolutionary art which we use to counter-attack the
regime is totally devastating counter-art.
Let freedom flows in the Irrawaddy River violently.
When bees vanish, say goodbye to your
fruits and veggies
From Pookyshoehorn for Ramblings
of a Madwoman
As
I was channel surfing last night waiting for the World Series to begin
(yay for the Red Sox!), I came across two separate shows about the
mysterious disappearance of honey bees in recent years. Known as Colony
Collapse Disorder, the cause of the current situation has the
scientists somewhat baffled. From Bloomberg:
Colony Collapse Disorder remains an entomological enigma a year after
it was first described by U.S. beekeepers. The syndrome, in which bees
abandon their hives and die, has been found in at least 35 states, a
Canadian province and parts of Europe, Asia and South America. The
collapse hurt a quarter of U.S. beekeepers, wiping out 45 percent of
their bees on average.
As a gardener, and someone who in general spends a lot of time outdoors,
I feel as though I have a pretty good understanding of
appreciation for the intricacies of nature. Yet even I have a hard time
grasping the impact that the disappearance of honey bees would have on
our food sources. But it's not just about honey. If you take a step back
from the produce department of your local grocery store and picture the
life of that apple you hold in your hand, you'll see what I mean.
Virtually all the fruits and vegetables we eat have flowers that are
pollinated by bees. Without the pollination step, the plants won't
produce fruit. Instead, the flower will simply dry up and fall off.
In normal circumstances, the bee who found this apple flower would buzz
on back to the hive and do a nifty little dance telling the other bees
where this great orchard of pollen can be found. For some reason, today
the bee who goes out, doesn't come back to the hive. Eventually all the
worker bees stop coming back, and the colony at that particular hive is
gone.
To quote a beekeeper in the CBS
60 Minutes story, “Most of the people in this country have no idea
what it takes to put the food on their table.”
Are we all about to find out? You can learn more at the web page for Nature's
program, Silence of the Bees.
Know a blog that
deserves to be featured on the Blog World Report? Contact Robert.
Sunday Funnies
Compiled by BAC for Yikes!
Yet more Evidence
that Rudy Giuliani is a Fraud
From James for Genius
of Insanity
GOI:
A splash of cold water has been thrown over the Rudy Giuliani
for president campaign. A leaked document put some damaging
cracks on the main pillar of Rudy's platform, his claims that he
was Mr. Know-it-all before and during the 9/11 tragedy.
David Shuster, substituting
for Keith Olbermann as host of Countdown,
reported on Thursday that Rudy Giuliani's description of himself
as the only candidate who foresaw the danger posed by al Qaeda
before 9/11 has now been refuted by a leaked document.
Typical of Giuliani's claims
on the campaign trail is a speech he gave last summer in which
he said of the pre-9/11 period, "Bin Laden declared war on
us. We didn't hear it. ... I
thought it was pretty clear at the time -- but a lot of people
didn't see it, couldn't see it."
GOI: Get
the whole story from the video clip by clicking here. You'll
find it at the bottom of the page there.
My take: Even if you
believe that Giuliani did a great job on 9/11 it isn't much of a
platform to run a presidential campaign on because any mayor in
that situation would rise to the occasion. How many mayors do
you think would panic and run out of the city leaving the
residents to pick up and deal with the mess? He's a one trick
pony and a scary one at that. It is quite clear going into the
job as mayor that one of your main and most important
responsibilities as mayor is being the commander-in-chief for
that city in the event of a disaster. Just like Bush, all he has
to sell is fear and intimidation.
Rick, Rick, Rick ... Why Be Such a Dick?
From FranIAm
 You
know, I am a few days behind in getting this post written, but it
was hard for me to stay focused and get the right words out. Even
the title eluded me until just now.
At this point, I would imagine that most of you heard about Rick
Santorum's little speech
as he "celebrated" what is now known as “Islamo-Fascism
Awareness Week.”
Am I right to presume that next year, the local Hallmark store will
have cards ready for this?
At this point, I am not even going to go into the idiocy that is “Islamo-Fascism
Awareness Week”... I mean. Nevermind. David
Horowitz is a f*ckwit wingnut anyway and this was his next big
idea. (Do these people have anything better to do?)
Anyway,
as someone who shares (worry not
kids...) a few things with Santorum (you
are now thinking WTF?), I had to respond. So here is my "Letter
To Rick, Why Be Such A Dick?"
Dear Rick,
As an American - an American of at least some Italian descent and as
a Catholic, I write you this letter today. We have that in common.
Italian-American. Catholic. Human. Well sometimes I am not so sure
about that last one, but we will go with it for the moment.
As a Catholic and as a human, I would have to say that your speech
brought forth a number of emotions and feelings in me. Anger.
Frustration. Disbelief. Anger again.
However, as part of my faith practice, I do actually pray for my
enemies and for those I disagree with. Yes that would include you.
It is not easy. In fact it kind of sucks, but I do it. And I am not
going to say another word about it because that just makes me start
to sound like I am some kind of sanctimonious religious wingnut
freak. You know, kind of like you. Uh-oh, time to reset the prayer
counter again...
Well, running the risk of sounding like some wingnut I will say a
few more words about prayer. This of course is a risk, as many of my
blog readers may tune out. I take the risk willingly...
When I do pray for you, for Bush, for Cheney (he may actually be the
most challenging) or anyone else that I struggle with, I do not pray
that you become like me. Unlike you, I don't think I hold some high
moral ground with God. What I pray for is that God's will is
revealed in all of our lives. If that means I do become like you, I
will have to deal with that at that time. In the meantime, I am not
telling you what to do, so please stop telling me.
Having gotten fairly far afield from Islamo-Fascist matters, please
allow me to return there.
So as a Catholic, I am wondering about something that you said in
your speech last week. It was a real doozy and it went like this...
“Islam, unlike Christianity, is an all-encompassing ideology,”
said Santorum, a Penn State alumnus. “It is not just something
you do on Sunday…. We (as Americans) don’t get that.”
Now I am hardly the first person to point this out, but um-
Rick… Friday is the Muslim holy day, not Sunday. Just sayin'.
And as for “it
is just not something that you do on Sunday”…
Is that how you live your Catholic Christian faith? Just on Sunday?
That is so curious to me, given all that I have ever read about you
and given all the words I have heard you speak or write. And I am
not even going to go anywhere near that whole dead baby business.
Eeew.
I
find that rather curious, as you are part of a movement that seems
to want to force your religious morals on all of this country.
Hmmm… does that mean when you press them upon us, you only want us
to follow it one day a week? That makes it sound not quite as bad,
but I still don't want you all running my government, which is not
part of any church.
As I was at Mass- at Saturday vigil, yes practicing Catholic here, I
was thinking about your speech. Not that I care to make a big deal
of it, but maybe I have some “Islamo-facist” tendencies. You
see, I- um, how do I say this… Well, I attend daily mass several
times a week. Rick, is this wrong? Do tell! Should I just go on
Sunday? What about Saturday vigil? Is that ok?
Back to being serious for a moment, you see, Eucharist is not
something I just do on Sunday. In fact, I am pretty deeply committed
to my faith. Honestly I don’t like to talk about it too much, but
I will here, for context.
My faith is part of just about every moment of my life and every
fiber of my being. Interestingly enough, although you and I share
the same religion, I am fairly certain our theological
interpretation is quite different. Which is one of the reasons I
wanted to write to you today.
Anyway, when I was in church today, listening to today’s readings
and the Gospel, I was also thinking about you and the words of your
speech and how they relate to the words of Jesus Christ and other
Scriptures.
In case you missed Mass for The Thirtieth Sunday in Ordinary Time,
let me put some of those words here. It will also illuminate my
point for other readers.
At the beginning of the first reading, from Sirach, there was this:
Sir 35:12-14,
16-18
The LORD is a God of justice, who knows no favorites. Though not
unduly partial toward the weak, yet he hears the cry of the
oppressed. The Lord is not deaf to the wail of the orphan, nor to
the widow when she pours out her complaint
Now that is Scripture Rick, what do you make of that? God
knows no favorites, it says. That would kind of take your
conversation in another direction, wouldn't it? Do you think that
Jesus would be attending Islamo-Fascist Week? Does God like you
better than say Ahmadinejad?
I could be wrong, but the way I understand it, God loves each and
every one of us equally. This is pretty clear in any Catholic
theology that I have been taught. If God didn't love someone, or if
He loved someone better... Well, it just doesn't work that way.
And by the way, I had to include the part about hearing the cry of
the oppressed, the wail of the orphan and all that. Just saying,
that’s all. Not sure how you feel about all those oppressed types
and all with your conservative politics.
However, I digress… There are other parts of this week’s
Scriptures that I wanted us to discuss.
Like the Gospel for this Sunday.
Gospel Luke
18:9-14
Jesus addressed this parable to those who were convinced of their
own righteousness and despised everyone else. "Two
people went up to the temple area to pray; one
was a Pharisee and the other was a tax collector. The
Pharisee took up his position and spoke this prayer to himself,
'O God, I
thank you that I am not like the rest of humanity -- greedy,
dishonest, adulterous -- or even like this tax collector. I
fast twice a week, and I pay tithes on my whole income.’ But
the tax collector stood off at a distance and
would not even raise his eyes to heaven but
beat his breast and prayed, 'O
God, be merciful to me a sinner.' I
tell you, the latter went home justified, not the former; for
whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and
the one who humbles himself will be exalted."
It makes me wonder if you are the Pharisee or the tax collector? Far
be it from me to levy judgments, but you have honestly made it
really easy to do so. Darn. There goes the prayer counter back to
zero again!
Rick -who are you to tell other Americans that we do not understand?
In your speech you clearly said "We
(as Americans) don’t get that.”
Who are you to participate in something that is puts down another
faith? Who are you to tell us things about Islam that are not only
incorrect but are also incorrect about our own faith? Can you please
help me out here and explain this? Please take note of the poster
below before you flap your hypocritical jaw too!
So this letter is an invitation to you to answer these questions and
to come clean with what your agenda is.
Frankly, in my experience, your agenda is about power and control.
You want to rule over every element in life. Well Rick, that is
pretty much what you said, first of all about Islam. Didn't you? It
rules over every element?
In fact, this is what you said, didn't you? "Jesus
never won. He didn't run a society. Mohammad won. He ruled. He
conquered. So in Islam, every aspect of society is governed by
religion,"
Excuse me... I have had to pick myself up off the floor. Jesus never
won? Well I am not sure it "win" is the word I would use,
but if you actually do follow (and I mean that in the truest sense
of the word, follow) Jesus,
what he "won" was your eternal life stupid. (prayer
counter zero, franiam less than zero) So enough about the
"winning". I mean - you are not saying Jesus was a loser,
are you?
And ruling every aspect? You who are pro-life when it comes to
abortion and just about nothing else?! You who support war? The
death penalty? You who think home schooling is preferred over public
schools? You who would deny rights to GBLT people? How would you
have voted on the Dream Act and SCHIP? Would you vote for life? And
you have issues with Mohammed who would rule over all things?
And just a quick historical aside... Did or did not, the Catholic
church rule over every element of society for years and years and
years? And did or did not, that ruling hurt many people? Things like
the Crusades and the Inquisition come to mind for starters.
OK, I am ranting now and this letter grows long.
You sicken me and I don't really care for this moment where that
leaves my damn prayer counter. I will make my peace with Jesus.
Thanks for trying to intervene for me. I will say no this time.
So I simply suggest that you examine your heart, mind, spirit and
conscience to see where you land with all of this.
I have a feeling that maybe next year we will be celebrating
Santorum-Facist Week perhaps?
Signed,
Fran I Am I Guess An Islamo-Fascist After All
Dumbledore is WHAT?!?!?!?
From Melissa for Written
Rebellion
So,
there's a woman in my school program who posted this up on her
MySpace blog. She has a better sense of humor than I do, and her
tongue-in-cheek writing left me in stitches. I loved it and hope
you will too.
My
friends, JK Rowling has outed Dumbledore as a flaming
homosexual.
:)
In front of a full house of hardcore Potter fans at Carnegie
Hall in
New York, Rowling, sitting on the stage on a red velvet and
carved wood throne,
read from her seventh and final book, "Harry Potter and
the Deathly Hallows," then took questions. One fan
asked whether Albus Dumbledore, the head of the famed
Hogwarts School of Wizardry and Witchcraft, had ever loved
anyone. Rowling smiled. "Dumbledore is gay,
actually," replied Rowling as the audience erupted in
surprise. She added that, in her mind, Dumbledore had an
unrequited love affair with Gellert Grindelwald, Voldemort's
predecessor who appears in the seventh book. After several
minutes of prolonged shouting and clapping from astonished
fans, Rowling added. "I would have told you earlier if
I knew it would make you so happy."
But, really, who didn't know that? The oh-so-mahvelous
robes? The weird relationship with Grindewald that no one
really understood? Okay, so most people probably didn't pick
up on those hints at the time. What is hilarious are the
reader's comments on all of these article that always begin
with the words (in one form or another) "I'm not
homophobic, but..." and then go into detail proving
exactly how homophobic they are:
"why
did there have to be a gay character at all?"
For that matter, why do we have to have BLACK people in our
movies and
books??? Why can't the whole world just be rich, white,
republican
assholes who look and think and act EXACTLY like me? OR you
can stop being
so terrified of everyone who isn't exactly like you and
become an actual, decent
human being! Whichever.
"why did Dumbledore have to be gay, why not
some other
[background] character? Now I can never look at him the
same!"
So what you're saying is that you don't mind if people are
gay, as
long as you have no interaction or emotional attachment to
them? WOW,
that's so progressive and compassionate of you!
"homosexual characters have no place in a
children's
book."
In that case, we should ban every story ever written about a
prince
rescuing a "helpless" princess and marrying her.
Since you seem to have
such a problem with your children knowing anything about
families that don't
look like yours, maybe you should just keep them from
reading (or watching t.v.)
altogether, we wouldn't want them to, you know, think
critically about how
jacked up your morals are.
"this ruins the whole series for me."
Good you bigot. I don't want to think that we have the same
taste in literature. I mean, Seriously? the fact the you
found out a
character is gay (after the series was over and said series
never made a single
reference to the character's orientation), ruins it for you?
remind me
never to come out to your judgemental ass.
Oh, and I especially love this comment:
"umm...i
guess i now understand why dumbledore spent so much time
with harry alone in his office.... :/ "
Cuz, you know.... gay = pedophile.
I couldn't resist looking at the comment pages and I found
some of my own that are real winners:
"First of all, Dumbledore is a really old guy,
and there's no romantic storyline anywhere in the series that
involves him. If there were, there probably shouldn't be
anyway."
Homophobia AND ageism all rolled into one little package,
because, as we all know, old people aren't sexual, or
they shouldn't be.
"She doesn't sell enough books without having to
include a homosexual? Give us a break!!"
Yeah. You guessed it. She felt obligated to script a gay
character for her personal financial gain. Never mind that the
revelation came well after she's already made like a gazillion
dollars on royalties. Why don't you give ME a break?
"Many Harry Potter readers, not all, but a good
many, are too young to grasp the concept of a gay character in
a children's series."
I'd love to ask this guy at what age he thinks individuals CAN
"grasp the concept of a gay character," or how old
he thinks one should be before they are exposed to ignorance.
Obviously he knows nothing about emotional, cognitive, or
moral development. I could go on, but I won't bother.
"So, what's next? Heidi was molested by her
grandfather and Dorothy was doing no-no activity with her dog
Toto?"
Yes. Obviously. Because gay men prey on children and lesbians
prefer sex with animals.

WASHINGTON, Oct. 28 — In a reversal from past election
cycles, Democratic candidates for president are outpacing
Republicans in donations from the health care industry, even
as the leading Democrats in the field offer proposals that
have caused deep anxiety in some of its sectors.
Hospitals, drug makers, doctors and insurers gave
candidates in both parties more than $11 million in the
first nine months of this year, according to an analysis of
campaign finance records done for The New York Times by the
Center for Responsive Politics, an independent group that
tracks campaign finance.
In all, the Democratic presidential candidates
have raised about $6.5 million from the industry, compared
with nearly $4.8 million for the Republican candidates.
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York has amassed the
most of any candidate, even as she calls for
changes to the health care system that could pose serious
financial challenges to private insurers, drug companies and
other sectors.
Mrs. Clinton received $2.7 million through the end of
September, far more than Mitt Romney, the Republican who
raised the most from the health care industry, with $1.6
million. The industry’s shift in contributions toward
Democratic candidates mirrors wider trends among donors, but
the donations from this sector are particularly notable
because of the party’s focus on overhauling the health
care system.
People in the health care industry say the giving
reflects a growing sense that the Democrats are in a strong
position to win the White House next year. It also
underscores the industry’s frantic effort to influence the
candidates, as Democrats push their proposals to address
what many polls show is a top concern among voters... [emphasis
added]
Inserted from <NY
Times>
In one sense, the Times missed the
thrust of what's going on. Clinton is getting the
most, because her health care plan, among those offered by
Democrats, is the one that will do the least harm to
the sector, and thereby offer the least benefit to US
citizens. Only Edwards' plan offers a government run,
medicare-like option for consumers, and even that does not
go far enough. In the US we have socialized police
protection and socialized firefighter protection. We
also need single-payer universal health care for all,
because health care protection is too important to leave in
the hands of greedy companies for whom profit trumps care.
That big health care likes her best is another reason to
choose Edwards in the primary.
Stupid Stuff Said and Done
...
By Shane C. Mason for Montana
Netroots
This week has been rife with stupid things said and done,
so I wanted to take a few minutes and point a few out.
Dana Perino Hearts Global Warming
White house spokesperson Dana
Perino discussing the possible health benefits of global
warming was asked to detail some of the possible benefits
she kept mentioning:
“Look, this is an issue where I’m sure lots of
people would love to ridicule me when I say this, but it
is true that many people die from cold-related deaths
every winter. And there are studies that say that climate
change in certain areas of the world would help those
individuals. I’m not an expert.”
Yes I would and no you’re not.
Reporters? We don’t need no stinking reporters.
When I was a child and the Soviet Union was still a
threat we learned that one of the major problems with
communism was their was no freedom of the press. The
Government wrote, edited and produced the news and there was
not such thing as ‘investigative journalists’.
I think that we may have turned the corner this week when
FEMA held a press conference which was ran live on MSNBC and
Fox News concerning one of the worst fires in the nations
history. It was like most other press conferences you’ll
see, a gray haired white man standing behind a podium
answering reporters questions. The problem? Well, none of
the ‘reporters’ were reporters, they were all FEMA
reporters. Real reporters were not allowed to attend.
White House Press Secretary Dana Perino told real
reporters FEMA has issued an apology.
“It’s not something I would’ve condoned and I’m
sure they will not do it again,” said Perino.
In Richmond, Congressman George Miller wonders what FEMA
officials were thinking.
“It’s just an outrage and it’s ethically a very,
very bad thing for them to do,” said Miller.
A FEMA spokesman said the agency can and must do better.
When? We need a little competency in government.
The Gay Wizard
This weeks revelation by the author of the Harry Potter
series that she had always imagined the character Dumbledore
as gay led to another series of crazy rants from Bill
O’Reilly:
Now, many parents are worried in America about the gay
agenda and indoctrination of their children to see
homosexuality in a certain way. That debate is raging all
over the country. This now becomes part of that debate,
does it not?
So, I think, this is my conclusion is that J.K. Rowling is
a provocateur, did it on purpose, and now is just going to
let all hell break loose.
There are millions of Americans who feel that the media
and the educational system is trying to indoctrinate their
children to a certain way of life, and that includes
parity for homosexuals with heterosexuals.
And that’s what this Rowling thing is all about, because
she sells so many books. So many kids read it, that she
comes out and says, “Oh, Dumbledore is gay, and that’s
great.” And this — it’s another in the
indoctrination thing. That’s what the belief system is
among some Americans.
I am sure that J.K. Rowling is dying to indoctrinate
American children to become one of ‘the gays’. For
cripes sake. Not only did Bill not know that J.K. Rowling is
a woman, I wonder if he will figure out that she is from
Britain and probably doesn’t have an agenda as a
provocateur to the homosexual indoctrination of American
kids. Whatever gets you ratings I guess.
Bill O’Reilly seems pretty down on the gays right now
for a man who tried to solicit a threesome with his producer
a
few years back:
Andrea Mackris, a former producer on The O’Reilly
Factor, filed her suit against O’Reilly Oct. 13,
alleging that “he subjected her to repeated instances of
sexual harassment and spoke often, and explicitly, to her
about phone sex, vibrators, threesomes, masturbation, the
loss of his virginity and sexual fantasies.”
THIS STORY IS INCREDIBLE!
Rumsfeld flees France fearing arrest
Sat, 10/27/2007 - 08:45
Former US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld fled France today
fearing arrest over charges of "ordering and
authorizing" torture of detainees at both the
American-run Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq and the US military's
detainment facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, unconfirmed
reports coming from Paris suggest.
US embassy officials whisked Rumsfeld away yesterday from a
breakfast meeting in Paris organized by the Foreign Policy
magazine after human rights groups filed a criminal complaint
against the man who spearheaded President George W. Bush's
"war on terror" for six years.
Under international law, authorities in France are obliged to
open an investigation when a complaint is made while the
alleged torturer is on French soil.
According to activists in France, who greeted Rumsfeld
shouting "murderer" and "war criminal" at
the breakfast meeting venue, US embassy officials remained
tight-lipped about the former defense secretary's whereabouts
citing "security reasons".
Anti-torture protesters in France believe that the defense
secretary fled over the open border to Germany, where a war
crimes case against Rumsfeld was dismissed by a federal court.
But activists point out that under the Schengen agreement that
ended border checkpoints across a large part of the European
Union, French law enforcement agents are allowed to cross the
border into Germany in pursuit of a fleeing fugitive.
"Rumsfeld must be feeling how Saddam Hussein felt when US
forces were hunting him down," activist Tanguy Richard
said. "He may never end up being hanged like his old
friend, but he must learn that in the civilized world, war
crime doesn't pay."
International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) along with
the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), the European
Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR), and the
French League for Human Rights (LDH) filed the complaint on
Thursday after learning that Rumsfeld was scheduled to visit
Paris.
Arianna at HuffPo says: "We have a mainstream on the
right that supports torture, supports the behavior of
Blackwater thugs, supports the gutting of our civil liberties.
So, it can no longer be denied: the right wing lunatics are
running the Republican asylum.
** Please go to StopIranWar.com and sign the petition for
General Wesley Clark.
A while back, I passed on some information about the local
efforts in Memphis to block white dominated, corporate
interests from taking control of the Lorraine Motel, where
MLK was assassinated, which has been made a National Civil
Rights Museum. Gary Younge, who does excellent
reporting on race issues, has picked
up the story for The Nation.
Twenty years ago, the Lorraine Motel, where King was
assassinated, was turned into a National Civil Rights
Museum. The chair of the executive committee of its board,
J.R. “Pitt” Hyde III, is a wealthy white Republican.
Charged with safeguarding a vital landmark in the nation’s
racial history, Hyde lobbied for the defeat of Harold Ford
Jr.’s bid for the vacant Senate seat from Tennessee in
what was widely regarded as the most racist campaign of the
2006 election. While Hyde has been representing the civil
rights museum, the company he founded, AutoZone, has been
embroiled in a longstanding EEOC racial discrimination
lawsuit.
The board, on which blacks are a minority, is packed with
those who dedicate their lives not to civil rights but to
corporate profits. And they know how to do business.
Recently the board discussed exercising an option to buy the
museum building from the State of Tennessee, which owns it,
for $1. (Apparently they never made a formal offer, as they
knew it would be rejected.) Black history on sale at bargain
prices.
Younge lays out high stakes of this battle over memory and
symbol.
Hyde and the corporate agenda he represents remain at the
core of that “problem,” which keeps one in four Memphis
residents (who are mostly black) below the poverty line.
The civil rights movement made great strides in achieving
integration. But that victory prompted white supremacy to
become more skillful and subtle in its bid for
self-preservation. Segregation was outlawed, but its
economic, social and cultural legacy was left intact. Black
people in Memphis now have the right to go into any
restaurant they like. Unfortunately, many cannot afford
anything on the menu.
Second, the story of the Lorraine museum is a brazen
example of the crude but effective manner in which the
right, which fought so hard to thwart the work of the civil
rights movement in its heyday, has sought to buy, co-opt or
otherwise manipulate the movement’s most popular emblems.
Four years ago fundamentalists stood on the steps of
Alabama’s Supreme Court building, waving Confederate flags
and singing “We Shall Overcome” as they protested the
removal of the Ten Commandments from the rotunda. A few
months earlier, opponents of affirmative action went to the
building to protest a violation of the Fourteenth
Amendment–ratified to protect the rights of freed slaves.
They called on universities to judge applicants not by
“the color of their skin but by the content of their
character,” words of course lifted from King’s “I Have
a Dream” speech.
“Nowadays they like the fact that they can sit down to
dinner at the site of the King assassination,” says
Circuit Judge D’Army Bailey, a founder of the museum who
was ousted from the board. “It gives them a good feeling.
Corporations want to be identified with it because that kind
of identification brings pacification. It’s been
hijacked.”
Hey, dummy, you didn’t set your clock back today, did you?
It’s different this year. Daylight
Saving Time will end on the first Sunday in November.
That’s next Sunday, November 4.
 Well
today I have some good news to write about for a change. I
discovered yesterday that Nazi War Criminal Donald { von
Weichs}
Rumsfeld
had a complaint filed against him in France for his role
in instituting Torture at Guantanamo Bay Cuba, Abu
Ghraib
and many other Military Prisons in Iraq.
He also is more than likely involved in the use of Foreign
Prison sites {Black Prisons} where torture has been known
to occur in the past.
This is just another one of the many complaints that have
been filed against him on other Countries such as twice in
Germany and also filings in Argentina, Spain and Sweden.
This may be our best chance to finally start holding those
who denigrated our country's honor and integrity with the
cancer they have been spreading since taking over our
country.
First we have this story from The
Raw Story by Jason Rhyne.
Here is a brief paragraph from this article.
"The filed documents allege that during his tenure,
the former defense secretary "ordered and
authorized" torture of detainees at both the
American-run Abu
Ghraib
prison in Iraq and the US military
detainment facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba."
I'm just loaded with links about this. I must say in all
honesty that it warmed me cockles to read about Herr Rumsfeld
possibly finally getting the recognition he so deeply
deserves. Oh me bad.
Then we have a story on Znet.org
that is no longer available as I was not able to connect
with the link on Znet.
Basically it's the same issue with a brief quote I had
wanted to post here. I am however going to post the link
at the end of this post just in case its an issue of the
server being overwhelmed by those interested in it.
Next in our roundup of Herr Rumsfeld
news we have Reuters.
An interesting paragraph our these two.
"We will only stop once the American authorities
involved in the torture programme are brought to
justice," CCR
chief Michael Ratner
said in a statement posted on the FIDH
Web site.
Donald Rumsfeld
must understand that he has nowhere to hide. A torturer is
an enemy of humanity," he added."
I have wrote that there will be no place on Earth for them
to hide. And like the Nazi Hunters who still continue to
hunt down Nazi War Criminals today they will be looking
over their shoulders for a long, long time, waiting for
the other shoe to drop.
Proceeding onward we now travel to Germany
with an article from DW-WORLD.DE
Deutsche
Welle.
Below is a short excerpt from this story.
"The rights groups notably cite three memorandums
signed by Rumsfeld
between October 2002 and April 2003 "legitimizing the
use of torture" including the "hooding" of
detainees, sleep deprivation and the use of dogs.
The group also has testimony from Janis Karpinski
-- the one-time commander of US military prisons in Iraq
-- to bolster its claims."
There is so much evidence out in the public domain I don't
see how the International Community can ignore it. They
need to uphold their obligations under the Treaty's they
have signed.
From Germany we come back to the good ole United States
and Democracy
Now and this brief portion of the story below.
"U.S. and European human rights groups filed a
lawsuit in France today charging former Defense Secretary
Donald Rumsfeld
with ordering and authorizing torture. The plaintiffs
include the New York-based Center for Constitutional
Rights and the Paris-based International Federation of
Human Rights. They say Rumsfeld
authorized interrogation techniques that led to abuses at
US-run prisons in Iraq and Guantanamo Bay.
The complaint was filed with the Paris prosecutor’s
office as Rumsfeld
arrived in France for a visit. This is the fifth time Rumsfeld
has been charged with direct involvement in torture since
9/11. Michael Ratner
is the president of the Center for Constitutional Rights.
He joins me in the firehouse studio. Jeanne Sulzer
is a French attorney with the International Federation of
Human Rights. She joins me on the line from Paris."
Those are some of the stories that can be found in the Internet
about War Criminal Rumsfeld
and there are many more to be found if one looks for them.
There also is another interesting story from Prison
Planet.TV. There are many links in this article which
one might want to examine on different aspects covered in
the piece.
Besides the current charges that were filed there have
been others as in the next two which were lawsuits brought
by innocent detainees swept up in the Torture Policy of
our Government and Der Fuhrer Adolph Bush and his Nazi
second in command the Dark Lord Dick {Heinrich Himmler}
Cheney.
Here are two for your perusal. Lets begin with Media
Alert. This is a travesty of justice if you ask me and
America should be ashamed of itself.
The other law suit can be found here
with a supporting pdf
file link and a link to Dogspot
which has the story. I do not know about this site or if
in fact the lawsuit is genuine or not. I leave that up to
you to decide and verify.
Now I don't know about you, but I am thrilled to know that
this maybe a start to holding these War Criminals
accountable for their actions. We have to let the World
know that our current elected officials will not hold
these Criminals accountable and that many of them are
complicit in the War Crimes being committed or have sat
silently by while turning a blind eye to justice.
I am ashamed of what the current elected Executive Branch
and Congress has turned our Country into. This has become
the Fourth Reich and is going to be worse than Hitler's
Nazi Germany if the World don't step up and Honor there
responsibilities under the Treaty's they signed.
They will be just as guilty as our leaders are for not
standing up for Human Rights and one day when their told
to shut up of be bombed back to the Stone Age it may be to
late for them. That's
what happened in Germany when Hitler was rising to power
and that's
what will happen to them if they don't speak up now.
It appears that we may finally be on the road to recovery
as someone who had a severe heart attack and had major
surgery to repair a broken vein. I sincerely hope and pray
that the Lord will intercede on our behalf and restore us
to the Democracy we once were.
Just in case it was only a server error here is the other
link for Znet.
Photo Credit: http://fixco1.com/
Domestic Fascism
Awareness Week Kickoff
By Blogenfreude for Agitprop
A new week and, this week, we'll try to find the
worst of the worst ... a fascist a day. Last
week the teaser was Giuliani,
but let's do some of the less obvio us
ones, shall we?
How about David
Horowitz? Founder of Islamofascism Awareness
Week:
[Horowitz's failure to criticize medieval states
that are our "friends"] also shows that
Horowitz and his ilk don’t care about fascism, as
long as the fascists are our friends. In fact,
Horowitz has prasied the Contra fascists of
Nicaragua who launched an attack on the
democratically elected Sandinista government in the
1980s, an offensive that led to thousands of deaths.
“I can’t wait for the contras to march into this
town and liberate it from these fucking
Sandinistas!” he said as the fascist
paramilitaries were liquidating a democratic
government. And then there’s General Pinochet, the
fascist dictator of Chile, who presided over a
prison state for 15 years, rounding up and murdering
thousands of left-wing activists. Horowitz,
referring to calls to imprison Pinochet on his trip
to Britain, said, “Imprisoning Pinochet on a
foreign trip to seek medical help is one of those
bad ideas of progressives that will come back to
bite them.” He instead notes, “Under the 15
years of Pinochet’s rule, Chile had prospered so
greatly that it was dubbed the ‘miracle
economy,’ one of the two or three richest in Latin
America.”
Praising Pinochet? Well, that earns Horowitz
the first slot in Domestic Fascism Awareness Week.
|
Types of People Who Will Vote for
Hillary Clinton for President
By Human for Carbon
Paper
 1)
People who own Multi Billion Dollar Propaganda machines. Like
Rupert Murdoch who brings you the always Fair & Balanced
Fox News.
2) Her old friends at Wal
- Mart.
3) Defense
Contractors.
4) High
Moral Voters like David Brooks, the conservative columnist at
The New York Times, who wrote that Clinton "seems to offer
the perfect combination of experience and change" and said
she's changing perceptions in a way that may persuade voters to
give her a second look.
5) People who suffer from Knee Jerkitis. Voting for someone
because they have a "D" after their name. Kind of a sub
category of #6.
6) People who are willfully stupid. Those that choose to ignore
her ties to the Mighty MIC, the MSM, White water, Mena Arkansas
and her full support of the Bush Regime's Foreign Policy.
7) The uninformed. They care. They just don't have a solid
political base of thought developed
and generally follow the herd.
8) The misinformed. Fed a steady diet of fearful propaganda filled
pablum since babies they react like textbook examples of victims
suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
9) Bush's old Oil/Terrorist
Friends like Alan
Quasha.
A Hillary Clinton Vote is a vote for more War, Higher Taxes, A
strengthened Corporate Government and the final destruction of any
chance to turn America from the solid Fascist State to a
Government for and by the People.
A Few FAS Rants
From Sheri Rouse for Ain't
That Sherific
Fetal Alcohol Syndrome. Yucky! Yucky for Dustin to live through
and yucky for us to deal with. Yucky to see my 12 year old boy
struggle with simple tasks a 5 year old can accomplish. Just plain
yucky.
Let's review . . . FAS
= yucky.
I had a co-worker tell me that her daughter's midwife told her to
drink a glass of wine. She said her daughter was overdue and that
this would help her go into labor. HALT.
You are telling a pregnant woman to drink alcohol. These
professionals who tell their patients that's it's okay to drink
any quantity of alcohol at any time during pregnancy should spend
one day with Dustin. Let alone one's who suggest it. AGH!
Stupidity
abounds.
Let's review . . . professionals who advocate for alcohol
= stupidity.
Dustin returned this weekend to the special needs program
at church. We have been absent for a
few months since his behavior was so horrible there. He did
well. They had a Harvest Party on Friday evening and they had
someone to escort all the kids around to each game. He had a blast
and I love it when he gets one-on-one time with another adult and
has as successful trip into the "real world". I took the
other two kids to a birthday
party
at McDonalds
and then we went shopping without Dustin. It was nice to have the littles
alone, and I think it was good for them as well. All of us need
respite every once in a while for our sanity.
Let's review . . . shopping without Dustin = calm.
I spent the other day talking to a friend about Dustin and the
road we have been down with him thus far in our lives together. It
is always nice to not only educate people about the struggles
these children deal with, but how far he has truly come. It is so
difficult to see the larger picture
when you live through it daily. He really has come a long way.
Hopefully the coming years will allow him the opportunity to grow
and flourish even more. I have been noticing in the past few weeks
the beginnings of reading skills. Dustin has come a long way when
it comes to "functional literacy" with the curriculum in
his MoMH
classroom. They teach things like in/out, push/pull, open/closed.
They also work on food site words and things that will help these
children be more independent
when they grow to be on their own, whether that be independent
living or a residential
facility. He has done well for the most part with the
memorization. Lately I have seen a HUGE increase in print
awareness and him trying to decode words. He doesn't have the
skills to decode phonetically, but he does use the words that he
does know or the pictures to attempt to decode what he wants to
read. Oddly enough he can read most of the titles of shows on our DVR
menu and our onscreen guide. It is amazing! I will take any little
glimmer of hope I an get if it means his reading skills are
finally emerging.
Let's review . . . Hope = peace.
Coverage of Yesterday's Massive
Anti-War Demos in the Blogs
From Libhom for Godless
Liberal Homo
Proud
Progressive used the comments section of my
last posting on yesterday's massive demos to point out that there
has been very little "A-list" blog coverage of the actions
in 10 US cities against the war in Iraq. This is disturbing, since one
of the main purposes for people to have political blogs is to fill in
the blanks left by a corporate media that largely downplayed this
massive show of opposition to a war which is making so many
corporations richer.
It seems like a good idea to highlight examples of blogs (mostly small
but not entirely) that get it when it comes to the role of blogs as
independent media.
Seattle
marchers join nationwide protest day - Sticker
Shock Music
Thousands
Protest Iraq War- jobsanger
Photos
From The Oct 27th SF Anti-War Protest - IndyBay
Great
Attendance at Denver October 27 Peace Rally - Metro
Denver Greens
Everyday
Citizen had two articles on local protests:
There was some big blog coverage, though nowhere near enough.
Thousands
call for swift end to Iraq war - Michael
Moore
Truthout ran the San Francisco Chronicle article
on the protest.
Meanwhile, Back In
Iraq
By Windspike for Educational
Whisper
More GIs
continue to get slaughtered for no particular reason. Here's one
Green Beret I wouldn't mess with:
'I Don't Think This Place Is Worth Another Soldier's Life'
You're right Sergeant, it isn't...it never was.
We have failed you young man. You
trusted us to never send you into harm's way unless absolutely
needed for the defense of your country, and we all betrayed that
trust by allowing a morally bankrupt psychopath on the payroll of
Big Oil to take charge of our brave volunteers.
Can you ever forgive us?
Healthcare
Thoughts
From Spadoman for Round
Circle
I'm sitting in my van in front of the library.
How freaking pathetic is that! I slept well for the few hours
I was in bed, but when I was awake, well, I was awake. I'm
having a hard time getting an internet connec tion where we
are staying, so, inside the library, or outside, when
it is closed, is my only alternative until I get things worked
out.
In the meantime, i wanted to get this article I wrote some
exposure, so, I'll post it here. It was posted a few days ago
at The Siren's Chronicles, so, this is a repost I guess. In
any event, have a read and state your opinion. I'd like to get
discussion and dialogue going on this subject. The more I
think about a National health care plan, the more it seems
impossible to have health care for everyone. What do you
think?
Health Care
Talk about a National Health Care Plan is nothing new. There
has been a lot of talk, especially since one of the Democrat
Presidential front runners, Hillary Clinton, has tried to
implement a health care plan before, when she was the first
lady.
We all know the basics. Canada has a National health care
plan. All Canadians suposedly have equal access to health
care. And in Sweden, they have it too. We have also been told
that these two countries pay very high taxes to have this
National plan. I personally don’t know the particulars of
either countries National plan.
It is a political ideal, this paying of taxes. Generally, on
the face of it, Republicans don’t want to have to pay more
in taxes, and that taxes should be cut. Democrats are okay
with some taxation, as long as the people with higher incomes
pay a lot of it and the poorer of the lot get some kind of a
break. Republicans also like to have private businesses take
care of things and let the people pay for it, however they
can, instead of taxes paying for these goods and services.
Democrats think taxes should pay for certain things, like
health care.
It’s not so easy. The whole capitalistic idea is not so easy
to comprehend, let alone implement, in today's very complex
society. And since we do have a capitalistic platform that
this country is run on, therein lies the majority of the
problem with not only health care, but with anything that has
to do with money.
Baseball, and professional sports in general, run on this
capitalistic principle. But there are some different rules
that come into play. For example, an owner has a team. The
owner pays the players. The players play the game. Major
League Baseball decides that they will pay their players so
much money and that each team has a ceiling, or a maximum
amount that they are allowed to spend for players. This is
called a salary cap.
A team might have a salary cap of, say, one hundred million
dollars. They can spread this around any way they wish. 20
players all get five million dollars a piece. Or pay one guy
ninety million, and spread the other ten million dollars out
to the other 24 players. The owner decides who gets what.
But each team has a different salary cap. Each team gets a
different amount of revenue from the money made when a game is
shown on TV and advertising is sold. There is a complicated
mechanism to decide what teams gets the most, and what team
gets the least. Of course the team that gets less of a salary
cap, doesn’t get the pick of the crop. That means that
better players, the ones that command higher prices, go play
for the team that gets more revenue and therefore has more
money to spend on players. They become better teams because
they can afford better players.
Let’s look at health care the same way for a minute. Say
that you have a higher salary cap than someone else. The
salary cap here is how much you have to spend on health care
from your paycheck. Joe Blow works for a good Fortune 500
company in management and the corporation pays the premiums
for his health care. Mr. Blow only pays a small percentage for
the health care of anyone in his family.
Mr. Blow has access to health care and whenever he or anyone
in his family has a medical issue, they go to the appropriate
medical care facility, be it a hospital or a clinic, for care,
and seldom have to pay any bills associated with medical care.
A small co-pay for each visit and a small amount of co-pay for
a prescription.
These small amounts are easily taken care of because the
Blow’s have a steady income and cash available in the bank
as savings if not just some cash on hand. A ten dollar co-pay
for some pills is no problem.
People like the Blows’ get better rates on their car
insurance, are able to utilize tax loopholes, have access to
credit when unexpected problems arise and are able to
generally have more money because they make a good salary and
may have some financial skills.
Now lets look at Julio Rodriguez. Julio’s salary cap for
health care isn’t as high as the Blows’. Julio works for a
company that pays him only what they have to pay him. There is
not a demand for his services because he is semi skilled at
the labor he performs. If he wants to make more money, he must
go somewhere else. This company will hire someone immediately
at these low wages if Julio leaves. Besides, it will be hard
for Julio to get another job at all because many places
won’t hire someone with dark skin and a Mexican name. By the
way, Julio is an American citizen, was born in this country to
people who legally immigrated here from Mexico two generations
ago.
They do not pay anything for his health care. Julio has access
to a health care plan, but he has to pay for it. Money is
taken out of every check he makes to pay for a plan so he can
have health care. If he wants his family to have health care,
he has to have more money taken out of his check.
And if anyone uses that health care, he still has to pay the
co-pay amounts for visits and prescriptions. The Rodriguez’s
don’t have much money in their checking account and have no
savings at all. It is hard for them to pay the co-pay money as
all that is left from a paycheck is used to pay bills, buy gas
and eat.
The Rodriguez’s pay a high rate of auto insurance because
his credit isn’t as good as some people. He pays higher
rates for interest when he does buy car and has to get a loan.
Any borrowing is hard to come by when an emergency arises.
Julio works with many other people who get opaid the same and
receive the same benefits. His best frind, Bill Ward, has the
exact same problem with his families health care issues. Bill
Ward is also an American citizen. His great grand parents
immigrated to this country two generations ago as well from
Ireland.
Using this example, you can see that if the government were to
ask Joe Blow to pay more taxes so he and his family can have
health care, Joe might say “No”, because he doesn’t need
any more health care benefits and he doesn’t want to pay
more money for something he already has.
Julio Rodriguez and Bill Ward would gladly pay higher taxes so
they would be able to get more money on their paychecks
because they no longer would have to pay so much for the
health care for their families. Surely the amount of the
higher tax would not be as much as the health care deductions.
Julio and Bill would actually take home more money each
payday. Joe would take home less.
Add to this scenario the person that has a job that doesn’t
offer health care at any cost. Or overtime for that matter.
The sole responsibility to have health care is on the back of
this worker. The cost is so high, that to pay for health care,
his family would not be able to do simple things like eat
healthy nutritional food or enjoy a simple pleasure of life
like have ice cream with their child’s birthday cake on that
special day.
The argument can be made by some people that everyone had a
chance to get an education and get a good job. Julio or the
other guy I talk about, his name withheld by request, (he is
embarrassed that he doesn’t make as much money as Joe or
Julio), had the same opportunity to get an education and get a
job with better benefits and higher pay.
But that isn’t true for a wide variety of reasons. These
opportunities are not available for every individual. There
are barriers in place that make it impossible for some.
Discrimination barriers because of color or Nationality.
Gender barriers. Barriers because the parents had no foresight
and didn’t teach the value of education or downplayed it.
Poverty is taken into the equation and used as another way to
discriminate. Add to this the same problem that plagues those
with no health insurance, that is, no money to afford more and
better education.
Surely, there are people of every race that have money
problems or other problems that they have controlled with
their own hand that makes it hard to get a good education that
would lead to a good job and better pay. Some people just
screwed it up for themselves earlier on in life. But some
didn’t. Some are just left out because they are from poor
families or are discriminated against or just don’t have any
skills.
I don’t know each persons individual situation. Some of you
reading this have health insurance, some of you don’t, and
some of you have some sort of something, but it is so
restrictive that you’d be better off paying for the
healthcare you need rather than file a claim with the
insurance you have because they’ll raise your rates.
When money is the only way to have something in a capitalistic
society, then there is a percentage of the population that
will have health care, and a percentage that won’t. The
percentage that doesn’t have health care probably won’t be
the target market of new cars and trucks or investment
services offered by online brokers or insurance companies.
They will, however, be the target market for the beer
manufacturers and the get-rich-quick programs offered on TV as
paid advertising programs.
It is the nature of the beast. The corporations offering
health care are huge and profitable. The more profitable they
are, the more investors buy stock and the price of this stock
goes up. Investors make money and the prices go up to pay the
stockholders. The costs then rise and more people can’t
afford health care.
But other large corporations that also made money can afford
to give their employees a health care plan. And the smaller
ones go out of business or lay people off or cut benefits,
like health care programs.
There is only so much money. If you live in a town of one
thousand people and there is a hardware store, the store sells
to one thousand people. If another hardware store moves into
town, then between the two stores, there is only one thousand
people. They will either be satisfied with 500 customers a
piece, or the competition will decide who makes the most
money.
I have always been puzzled by something. In TV automobile ads,
the offer for zero percent financing is available for “well
qualified” buyers. If you don’t have these qualifications,
which are usually perfect credit and a balanced income to
expense ratio, you must pay more.
Same at a bank savings account. You get a free toaster by
opening a five thousand dollar savings account. I tell you, if
I had five grand, I’d go out and buy not only a toaster, but
a new frying pan for the eggs and bacon.
This system is set up to reward those that, for whatever
reason, have more money, and punish those that don’t have as
much, for whatever reason. To the rich, it isn’t punishment
that the poor don’t have what they have. But to the poor, it
is sheer punishment to see others being happy with what is
touted as “Quality of Life” and the “American Dream”.
There will be no health care for everyone. Just like Alex
Rodriguez will never play baseball for the Twins. A certain
salary cap is needed for the likes of him, just like a certain
salary cap is needed to have health care.
Health care providers are a huge business in America. These
large corporations won’t sit back and take lkess money for
their stockholders. Even small fringe businesses that sell
health care premiums to people are a big business when taken
as an industry of themselves.
Money is at hand here and there is only so much to go around.
A government sponsored health care plan could never pay the
billions and billions of dollars that are in circulation with
the health care providers and the fringe industries.
Do you think the system needs fixing? Or do you feel it is not
broken? Do you think the Nation should have a National Health
Care Plan for every American?
If you respond to these questions, please tell us the bare
bones situation in your household. Do you have health care? Do
you pay for it? Is there anything you don’t have that you
wish you did have, and you would if you didn’t have to pay
so much for health care? Be reasonable, wanting a Cadillac
instead of a Ford doesn’t count. I’m talking about having
a car at all because of health care costs.
Or do you just don’t have health care and are taking your
chances? Do you rely on Catholic Charities or Lutheran
Brotherhood? Welfare or some other program?
Hypothetically, what would you do if you had a child or a
loved one and they would not treat them for a sickness because
you couldn’t pay for it?
I wait to hear from you. I’m sure there is a perspective I
don’t know about. In my opinion, the cost of this war in
Iraq, almost 500 billion dollars so far and more is being
asked for, a lot of health care could have been provided along
with a lot of education. That’s all this is, my perspective.
We each have our own situation.
"Well, In
Fact Yes ..."
From Tengrain for Mock,
Paper, Scissors

(AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall)
“…as a venture capitalist, I did buy up many of your
companies, lay you off, and send your jobs overseas. Next
question?”

BLOG RECOMMENDATION
Let's try something just a tad bit different
tonight. I give you,
The History of the Button!
The site traces "the history of interaction design
through the history of the button, from flashlights to websites and beyond."
I believe it was Donald Rumsfeld who said that there are known buttons and
their are unknown buttons and there are buttons we have used that we
didn't know about. Or something like that.
War protest 6th year
From Demeur
 I'm
glad to see that protesters have increased in numbers from
years past and a little more media attention was given to
the protest. But then our wonderful elected leaders are
still not listening and from the sounds of it there's no
great plan and little mention of bringing the troops home
anytime soon by any political party. So what have we gained?
A whole lot of people had a walk in the park and may be
hoarse on Monday. Come on people we can do better than that.
Let's be creative. Unless we can fill D.C. with a half a
million and clog the streets there or come up with better
ideas nothing's going to change. We need to find out exactly
why the Democrats will not stand up and lead and let them
know that if they don't start soon they'll see someone else
holding their office after the next election.
When the Comics Tell More Truth Than the
Media
By The Raver for RaveFilmsKC
Scott Adams' Dilbert comic
strip normally bites right to the core of Corporate America and
tells truths that no CEO wants to admit. In today's
strip, Adams zeros in on the mainstream media.
Dogbert and Rat are walking along, and Rat says, "My Brain
is empty...It feels great...Stress is just another word for
knowledge." Rat stops and says, "Wait a minute...How do
I know that? Gaaa!!! Something got past the filters!"
Then he sits down in the lotus position. "Must do
mantra," he says. And then he does the mantra: "Lindsay
Lohan...Britney Spears...Paris Hilton...OMMMMMMMM."
Dogbert asks, "Are you all good now?" Rat says,
"Have we met?"
The point is that people shut off their brains to what's going
on in the world by spending all their time sucking in mindless
crap like the Britney stories and all that other garbage that
passes for news.
Aldous Huxley warned of this in "Brave New World."
In my opinion, the giant corporate sports world does the same
thing. People have been conditioned to know the names of all the
football players but not have a clue about the Constitution. They
can quote baseball statistics, golf scores and the lyrics to rock
songs whose words I can't understand--yet they have no clue about
the Civil Rights Proclamation.
The media reinforces this endless descent into a cesspool of
ignorance. The ancient Romans knew the technique well. Feed 'em to
the lions--that gives the rabble something to get excited
about...let 'em into the arenas, let 'em get drunk, let 'em blow
off steam, make wagers, get into fistfights over whose gladiator
is more macho...feed them all the pap they want, and they will
become oblivious to the costly military adventures that are taking
all the gold out of the realm.
It's interesting, I think, that today's imperialistic ambitions
and actions of the right wing Republicans parallel so much those
of the once-mighty Roman Empire. In our case, not only is the
population as a whole woefully ignorant of history, so are the
rulers. Or...do they really know history yet are arrogant enough
in their sociopathy to think they can achieve a different outcome
by doing the same thing?
Fearing Fear and the Fear
Mongers
By Pamela Leavey for The
Democratic Daily
Paul Krugman points out the dangers of fearing
fear itself, as the fear mongers continue to make it a focal
point in the upcoming presidential election:
In
America’s darkest hour, Franklin Delano Roosevelt urged
the nation not to succumb to “nameless, unreasoning,
unjustified terror.” But that was then.
Today, many of the men who hope to be the next president —
including all of the candidates with a significant chance of
receiving the Republican nomination — have made unreasoning,
unjustified terror the centerpiece of their campaigns…
Krugman goes on to say:
All
of this would be funny if it weren’t so serious.
In the wake of 9/11, the Bush administration adopted
fear-mongering as a political strategy. Instead of treating the
attack as what it was — an atrocity committed by a
fundamentally weak, though ruthless adversary — the
administration portrayed America as a nation under threat from
every direction.
Most Americans have now regained their balance. But the
Republican base, which lapped up the administration’s rhetoric
about the axis of evil and the war on terror, remains infected
by the fear the Bushies stirred up — perhaps because fear of
terrorists maps so easily into the base’s older fears,
including fear of dark-skinned people in general.
And the base is looking for a candidate who shares this fear.
Just to be clear, Al Qaeda is a real threat, and so is the
Iranian nuclear program. But neither of these threats frightens
me as much as fear itself — the unreasoning fear that has
taken over one of America’s two great political parties.
Really, truly, “the
only thing to fear is the fear mongers.”
Oh, and just in time for Halloween, we have predictions
on the race from at least one dead president. Some days I just
want to say… wake me when it’s over.
Nader Supporters Finally
Realizing They Were Wrong?
By Ron Chusid for Liberal
Values
In 2000 the Nader supporters defended Ralph Nader’s absurd
claim that there was no difference between Gore and Bush.
Regardless of how obvious it became that there were significant
differences, Nader continued to repeat this line. Finally, a
couple of weeks ago, there were signs
that Nader finally realized that there was a difference. Now
we learn from The New
York Daily News that Nader supporters are turning to the guy
they rejected in 2000.
Right or wrong, people who voted for Ralph Nader get blamed
for costing Al Gore the 2000 election.
Now, some of those very same voters are throwing themselves
into a new - and nonexistent - campaign: Gore 2008.
And they say there’s no irony at all.
“In 2000, Nader was the most progressive candidate, and in
2008, Al Gore would be the most progressive candidate. There’s
no dissonance at all, I would say,” argues Bud Plautz, the New
York head of the movement to draft the former vice president.
That’s not just irony, that’s totally illogical. Sure,
Nader was the more progressive candidate in 2000, but that’s not
the point. Nader was a third party candidate with zero chance of
winning. For all practical purposes, a vote for Nader was a vote
to make George Bush, and not Al Gore president. It is not possible
to logically argue that Al Gore was no different from George Bush
in 2000 but is the best possible candidate now. Gore’s style
might have changed a bit, but otherwise he is not that different
now than he was in 2000.
U.S. Navy’s New Goal:
Using Military Power to PREVENT War
By Tom Harper for Who
Hijacked Our Country
Good God, a bunch of leftwing girlymen have taken over the U.S.
Navy! Preventing wars??? Will Halliburton and Exxon even permit
this?
The
new strategy of the Navy, Marine Corps and Coast Guard states:
“We believe that preventing wars is as important as winning
wars.” But, but look at all those ignorant primitive Third World
countries out there. They have trillions of dollars worth of
natural resources which are rightfully OURS Goddamnit!
According to this article, the strategy is to use aid, training
and other cooperative efforts “to encourage stability in
fledgling democracies.” This will create relationships around
the world which can be leveraged if a crisis breaks out.
The strategy is contained in a 16-page document titled “A
Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower.” It says
“Although our forces can surge when necessary to respond to
crises, trust and cooperation cannot be surged.”
This is the first time the Navy, Marine Corps and Coast Guard have
collaborated on a common defense strategy. Admiral Gary Roughead,
Chief of Naval Operations, gave a speech calling for more
international partnerships to make the Navy a “force for good”
around the globe.
And Admiral Mike Mullen — who has just become chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff — said he sees the Navy's humanitarian
work as the way to defeat terrorism by winning hearts and minds.
“Hearts and minds” — that’s the phrase Lyndon Johnson used
during
the Vietnam War: “The ultimate victory will depend on the
hearts and minds of the people who actually live out there.”
Well, we saw how that worked out. Maybe it'll be different this
time. We’ll see…
It's Only Love
By Hector Diego for The
Walrus Speaks

In the earlier 60's the people who owned radio stations in America
were so hard-hearted that they would not allow DJ's to play songs
from albums not released as singles. Consequently, great songs
like Lennon's "It's Only Love" got no airplay.
All that changed in the late 60's when "underground"
stations on the FM band started playing anything they felt like,
including an entire album side. For a few years, nothing was
better than Top Forty AM and the more adventurous FM, for sheer
variety and quality.
Now radio is complete garbage.
Dumb and Inappropriate
By Snave for Various
Ecstasies

I think I could have subtitled this rant "Feces in the
News"...
I guess we don't have to look to the Onion, Jon Stewart or
Stephen Colbert anymore to find fake news. At least those
sources of fake news tend to be funny. It looks like FEMA is
the latest source of fake news, and I don't think it's funny
at all. Is FEMA so desperate to salvage its reputation that it
thinks it has to stage fake news conferences which ?
Apparently so. FEMA employees posed as reporters, answering
questions posed by themselves about such matters as whether or
not FEMA was doing a good job with the response to disastrous
fires in southern California. Of course such questions were
answered in the affirmative...
The "news conference" was called in such a hasty
manner that there weren't any real news agencies present to
ask real questions (!)... but the proceedings were on video
and being carried live on television in some places.
Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff said "I think it
was one of the dumbest and most inappropriate things I've seen
since I've been in government."
Dumb and inappropriate. Words of wis-dumb. I think he said it
all, even if he was only talking about what FEMA did.
Well, I have to say there are lots of even dumber and more
inappropriate things going on in America today. Like
increasing the power of a unilateral executive, for example?
Or how about jones-ing for a war with Iran when our country is
already in two wars? How about Total Information Awareness,
illegal wiretaps, and creating a huge, bloated, expensive
bureaucracy such as... the Department of Homeland Security?
How about choosing not to expand health care for kids in favor
of dumping six or seven times that amount of dollars into what
is arguably the worst money pit in the history of America
(i.e. the Iraq war)? Which of these things are dumb, and which
are inappropriate... or which are BOTH?
I would say BOTH in regard to the Bush administration, which I
believe is both dumb and inappropriate in most things it does.
Congress, both Democratic and Republican, is dumb and
inappropriate in its virtual refusal to reign in the
ever-expanding powers of the administration, to end the war,
and to do the general will of the American people... which
happens to include many wishes which run counter to those of
the Bush/Cheney cabal. Congress is too dumb and has too many
inappropriate priorities to protect our country from veering
toward a dictatorship. I don't know how much more dumb and
inappropriate the administration and Congress can get.
I understand there is even criticism from the White House
about the fake FEMA press conference. Ha! THEY are concerned
about someone staging something that is fake? The White House
basically stages a "fake news conference" every time
Bush answers questions from reporters. They doctor and
suppress scientific information they don't want us to hear,
and they report their doctored information as fact. They have
even paid pundits to promote items from their agenda.
Apparently White House staff was not behind the fake FEMA
thing, but it would not have surprised me if they had been
ultimately responsible.
Whatever.
Warning:
This post is stuffed full of my personal political views. :)
I've been giving some thought to the death penalty lately
and something in particular triggered it off this morning.
The United Methodist Church has created a form that gives a
person the option of informing prosecutors posthumously that
in the event we become a victim of homicide that we do not
want them to seek the death penalty against the perpetrator.
I have signed one of those forms.
This is a bit closer to home for me than for some. In the
early 90s, someone tried to kill me.
Yes, I was an intended homicide victim.
I don't want to go into all the details because they're not
important. What matters is that I've felt the feelings. I
know what it is like to want revenge. My life was torn in
shreds by the experience. I had to leave in the middle of
the night and drive all the way across the country. I lost
everything I owned with the exception of the things I could
carry in a green garbage bag. It took months before I
stopped looking behind me.
That is because I knew the person would be back. The failed
attempt was just that.. a failed attempt that would be put
right at the earliest opportunity.
I've looked into the face of evil. It has a lasting effect.
I wanted to kill that person. If I am to be brutally honest,
at one point it seemed like a viable option. I seriously
considered homicide because I didn't see any other way out.
The police couldn't protect me. I'm in the wrong social
class for that. I couldn't afford to hire security staff. I
was a sitting duck.
Does that experience give me the right to lobby legislators
who craft public policy, based on my feelings alone?
I certainly hope not. A society where personal feelings of
anger and vengeance determine the laws of the land would not
be a place I'd want to live.
The US is one of the final holdouts of the industrialized
nations in doing away with the death penalty.
The nation that so proudly declares itself a Christian
nation still kills people to prove that killing people is
wrong. I have studied the Bible and I can not imagine any
way to spin Jesus as being pro-death penalty. Of course the
precepts of my faith do not allow killing. There is simply
no justification for it, beyond (perhaps) self-defense.
One of the arguments I frequently hear is that society needs
to be protected.
Life Without Parole will do that.
What say you?
Well, truth be told, Id’a thunk, and you’da probly
thunk too. LIEberman is a sleazy little coward, a
chickenhawk of the first order that doesn’t care how many
kids get sent off to die for his monkey Messiah’s Oedipal
fixations. But Holy Joe is also much, much more than that.
Even if you take his despicable cowardice off the table,
what you’ll still have is a guy who’s been whoring
himself out to campaign contributors for years. Pharmas,
especially, own big chunks of Holy Joe.
Given his willingness to sell himself to whoever may be
buying, it is no surprise that perhaps he rented himself out
to the folks who brought us things like the one-way ride and
“protection” rackets. Joe is all about being a high-paid
whore (a profession his wife also engages in,) and I am sure
that as long as the money’s the right color, LIEberman
doesn’t give a damn about any blood flecks that may be on
it.
Connecticut, what were you thinking? LIEberman makes the
loony bagmen down in Dixie look sane and honest by
comparison. Surely LIEberman is not a fitting
“representative” for the good people of the State of
Connecticut. Has anyone looked into recalling the little
weasel?
Contributions from associates and friends of
now-indicted garbage executive James Galante to the 2004
presidential campaign of U.S. Sen. Joseph Lieberman have
sparked the interest of federal investigators.
Lieberman’s bid for the White House took in at
least $14,000 from Galante, his associates and their
relatives in the fall of 2003, according to a Courant
review of campaign records.
The contributions to Lieberman, a longtime Democrat
who became an independent in 2006, are similar to
allegedly bundled contributions to three Republican
officeholders that earlier this month led to state charges
against Galante, who is also facing a 2006 federal
racketeering indictment.
What’s more, people familiar with the campaign
matters say, the names of Lieberman, the three Republicans
and about a dozen other Connecticut and New York
politicians have turned up on what the FBI loosely refers
to as a “ledger” that agents seized from Galante’s
office while investigating mob influence in the trash
industry.
The so-called ledger, a subject of interest to a
legislative committee investigating state Sen. Louis
DeLuca, R-Woodbury, summarizes information provided to
Galante by his lobbyists on fundraising goals set by a
number of candidates, the people familiar with the
documents said.
A Lieberman spokesman said no one knew of any
irregularities or improprieties at the time of the
contributions.
Galante was charged Oct. 13 with violating state
campaign finance laws, based on a series of suspect $1,000
contributions in 2002 and 2003 to political action
committees controlled by DeLuca, state Sen. David
Cappiello, R-Danbury, and Danbury Mayor Mark Boughton.
Galante is accused of trying to disguise up to $38,000 in
personal contributions to the three Republican
candidates’ political action committees.
“Bundling” of contributions - that is,
gathering together the checks of several associates and
giving them to a candidate all at once - is not illegal in
itself. It becomes illegal when someone uses bundling to
exceed a legal contribution limit by passing money through
third parties, who each write checks within the legal
limit.
That is what authorities claim Galante did for the
Republican politicians. He is accused of contributing as
much as $15,000 to DeLuca’s PAC, $15,000 to
Cappiello’s and $8,000 to Boughton’s. The arrest
warrant in Galante’s case said he passed the money to
the three officials in increments of $1,000 - the maximum
donation allowed by state law for a PAC - through
employees of his various trash businesses, their family
members or their friends.
Now it turns out that several of those same
employees, friends and relatives gave a total of $10,000
to Lieberman’s campaign on Nov. 25 and 26, 2003, a
Courant examination of federal campaign finance records
shows.
The donors, from Connecticut and New York, included
one of Galante’s lobbyists and the lobbyist’s sister -
as well as two former Galante employees recently sentenced
to federal prison for participating in a racketeering
conspiracy that Galante is accused of orchestrating
through his garbage companies.
In addition to the $10,000 on those two days in
November 2003, Lieberman’s campaign received $2,000 from
Galante himself on Sept. 30, 2003, and two more donations
totaling $2,000 from Galante lobbyist Joseph Walkovich of
Danbury on Sept. 30 and Nov. 14 of that year.
The head of the United Nations nuclear watchdog group, the
IAEA, has
a bone to pick with somebody.
Chief UN nuclear watchdog Mohamed ElBaradei Sunday accused
Israel of taking "the law into their own hands"
with a raid on Syria, and demanded more information about
what was hit.
Neither Israel nor the United States has furnished "any
evidence at all" to prove that the Syrian site bombed
last month was a secret nuclear facility, the director of
the International Atomic Energy Agency told CNN.
Of course, the
usual list of suspects lined up to bash the United
Nations. (This will apparently never end.) Emphasis mine:
The United Nations’ nuclear watchdog, Mohamed ElBaradei, who
has never succeeded in stopping a single country from
developing nuclear weapons, is condemning
Israel for the airstrike on Syria’s nuclear facility
Oh, yes indeed. Why on earth would anyone want to contact the
International Atomic Energy Agency if they suspected somebody
of building a nuke? I'm sure you all remember how
spectacularly unsuccessful they were in finding Saddam's nukes
in Iraq before we finally had to go in and find them
ourselves. And if you can't trust the United Nations to stop
the proliferation of nukes, who can you
trust? Why, the United States, of course.
Or... possibly
not. By following that link you can check out a book by
Adrian Levey and Catherine Scott-Clark titled Deception:
Pakistan, the United States, and the Secret Trade in Nuclear
Weapons. It tells the rather shocking story of how the United
States, particularly during the Reagan administration, not
only failed to stop Pakistan from getting the bomb, but were
active partners in ensuring they did.
If the United States had made any effort to coordinate an
investigation of that site with the United Nations, I think
ElBaradei would have known about it. I mention the United
States here, because Israel would never have gone ahead with
this without consulting us first. As the article points out,
Turkey was also a bit put off.
Israel's Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has acknowledged for the
first time that Israeli warplanes may have violated Turkey's
airspace during the incursion into Syria, an official said
Sunday.
Olmert apologized to his Turkish counterpart Recep Tayyip
Erdogan when the two men met in London Tuesday, the Israeli
official said.
Turkey had demanded an explanation from Israel after it was
embarrassed by the discovery of jettisoned fuel tanks on its
territory in the aftermath of the raid.
ElBaradei uses the phrase, "Bomb first and ask questions
later" during the interview. Everything we do in the
Middle East has repercussions. You are never truly acting
unilaterally when your actions impact your relations and
credibility with the rest of the world, including your allies.
Our intelligence failures in the rush to war in Iraq have
undermined us enough. And today, Turkey is already on pins and
needles over our Kurdish allies launching attacks into their
territory.
If there was a legitimate target inside of Syria, then of
course it needed to be investigated and appropriate action
taken. Jumping in feet first like this, though, whether we do
it ourselves or through our proxies in Israel just invites
more problems. The Bush administration is angry with the U.N.
for not being supportive of the invasion and occupation of
Iraq, I understand that. But refusing to work with them today
will simply send us further down the wrong path.
See
Original Story
About 30 million low-income American households who will
need help paying heating bills this winter from a U.S.
government program will be left in the cold because of a
lack of funding for the program.
The poor, already digging deep to pay for expensive
gasoline, also will face much higher heating fuel costs,
especially if oil prices stay near record levels.
Consumer groups and state energy officials have sounded
the alarm, saying a federal program to help poor
families pay heating bills will have nowhere near the
money needed to cover those expected to seek
assistance...
Still, the administration did not back away from its
threat to veto legislation to boost funding for LIHEAP
to levels it has called too high.
LIHEAP has an interim annual budget of $2.16 billion,
but the White House wants to cut the program to $1.78
billion for the 2008 spending year that began on October
1.
The House of Representatives has passed legislation to
boost the program to $2.66 billion, while a Senate
committee has cleared a bill keeping LIHEAP at its
current $2.16 billion budget.
We are already looking at another veto of the SCHIP bill
that this President has promised us. Now we are looking
at the possible veto of the heating bill for low income
families.
Just maybe if this President started to spend less on
his war, he would do more for the people of this
country. Tell me what is right America, should the
government stop using our tax dollars to take care of
our children healthcare and the poor people heat in the
winter? Do the government spends too much of Americans
tax dollars helping the poor, when it should be spent to
defend our country?
What say you?
"Do
you ever read any of the books you burn?"
He laughed. "That's against the law!"
"Oh. Of course." - from Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit
451.
As the late Frank Zappa once said, "It's not getting a
whole lot smarter out here..."
TUSCOLA, Texas (AP) Oct. 23 - A popular
English teacher has been placed on paid leave — and
faces possible criminal charges — after a student's
parents complained to police that a ninth-grade class
reading list contained a book about a murderer who has sex
with his victims' bodies.
Kaleb Tierce, 25, is being investigated for allegedly
distributing harmful material to a minor after the student
selected Pulitzer Prize-winning novelist Cormac McCarthy's
Child of God off the list and read it.
Tierce, a third-year teacher and assistant football
coach at Jim Ned High School, has not been arrested, but
his case has caused an uproar in this West Texas town of
700 people. Last week, more than 120 parents and students
crowded into a meeting where the school board voted to
keep Tierce on paid leave.
Most parents say Tierce should be reinstated,
regardless of whether the book is too graphic for teens.
"He's a great teacher and coach and motivates the
kids like no one else can," said Chris Garcia, whose
daughter was in one of Tierce's classes. "If you're
trying to protect your kids from things in books, you may
as well turn off the TV and video games. You try to
protect them as much as you can, but these days kids are
just exposed to so much."
Tierce, who has not been charged with any wrongdoing,
declined to comment when asked by The Associated Press
about the allegations.
Some students and athletes have worn armbands to school
and football games emblazoned with Tierce's initials,
hiding them under clothing. Others said teens were meeting
secretly to decide how to help the teacher they believe
did nothing wrong.
"He was the only one who understood us," said
Patrisha Ramirez, 15. "He would joke around. He would
make English interesting, for once."
In Tuscola, south of Abilene, Child of God was
on a list of titles compiled by all of the high school
English teachers for a pre-Advanced Placement class.
Although administrators' approval was not required for
the list, school officials have since removed the book
because they deemed it inappropriate for ninth-graders.
The book tells the story of a town's outsider who is
falsely accused of rape, then begins killing people. The
character ends up living in a cave with his victims'
decomposing bodies. The 1974 novel "plumbs the depths
of human degradation," according to its back cover.
The parents of one ninth-grade student filed a police
report on Oct. 1 with the Taylor County Sheriff's Office
earlier this month. Before contacting law enforcement
officials, they complained to the teacher and principal,
said district Superintendent Kent LeFevre, who declined to
reveal their discussions...
Parents have sought to ban various books, including
John Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men and J.K.
Rowling's "Harry Potter" series, as well as
books on Cuba or gay penguins, according to the American
Library Association. Last year, schools or public
libraries received nearly 550 requests to remove books,
the Chicago-based association said.
The entire article is
here.
Now, this is an especially timely story for me. For one
thing, my eighth grade students are currently reading Of
Mice and Men, which is one of my favorite books to
teach, and one which, when I survey my kids at the end of
every year, turns out to be one of the most popular books on
our reading list. We're right smack dab in the middle of it
right now. It's a "classic" that kids can tackle,
that doesn't talk down to them, that they find challenging
but still a "good read." When we're done reading
it, we watch the movie. It makes us all cry. It's a
wonderful experience.
But the recent experiences we've had in our school
district make us teachers worry now. We've started to look
over our shoulders a bit. We talk in low tones about whether
we should teach this or that, whether "they" will
"come after us." It's distressing for agitators
like me. In the town next door, a parent wants a book pulled
and banned from the school library. The book, The
Burn Journals, is a memoir of a young man
- an eighth grader - who tried to commit suicide by setting
himself on fire. It's a pretty rough book, I must admit, and
it should only be read by mature youg readers. It is
powerful stuff, but I will say that some of the sexual
references are a bit gratuitous. There's not much of that,
though. Most of it is gripping. This book had to be signed
out with the parents' permission, however. The kid brought
it home, the parents looked it over and didn't like what
they saw, BUT, instead of simply refusing to allow their
child to not read the book - you know, acting like parents
- they decided to throw a public tantrum and get the title
banned from the school shelves, so that no one can read it.
Nuh-uh. In America, we're supposed to be against censorship.
Supposedly.
Look, it's a scary world out there for kids, and for
parents. It's especially scary for adolescents. I get that.
I teach 'em, and I have two in my house at the moment. But
in my house, I am the censor. And I am proud of it. I decide
what movies come into the house and what gets played on the
DVD player I paid for. I get veto power over what titles get
downloaded from iTunes (it's my credit card that pays the
bill, after all), and I get to delete what slips by the
first time, because I actually torture my senses and listen
to my kids' "music." I check out what my kids are
reading, for school and for pleasure. Sometimes, Mrs.
Agitator and I even - get this - read along. We've been
doing this since our kids started reading. This - again - is
called parenting.
The parents in our neighboring community acted correctly,
up to a point. They investigated what their precious darling
was reading, they didn't approve of it, and they denied the
child the privilege of reading the book. That is their
perogative. BUT they do not have the right to have
the book pulled off the shelves of the library, to deny the
other students in that school the right to have their
parents make that same decision, or to decide otherwise. In
other words, the right for them to parent their
kids. The adults in the first case, however, are just plain
wrong, and that includes the administrators here. They never
should have suspended this teacher for a single second. I
hope he has a lawyer, and I hope he has a strong teachers'
union to protect him.
Yes, it is a truly scary world for children. I sympathize
with all those parents who struggle every day to do battle
with all the stuff out there that they and their kids are
faced with. That's what teachers and school librarians and
administrators are supposed to do. We love doing it. But
when we are bullied, we need to fight back. That's
what we tell the kids who are victimized by bullies to do:
stand up, look them in the eye, and tell them
"NO!"
It's time to start practicing what we preach.
"You don't have to burn books to destroy a culture.
Just get people to stop reading them."
-- Ray Bradbury --
(Strictly gratuitous Julie
Christie photo from the movie version of Fahrenheit 451.
You'll pardon me for this, I hope, as I have been madly in
love with her since my own adolescence...)
|