We'll never claim to be fair and balanced, just honest and trustworthy
November 8, 2007

A GEORGE BUSH VETO IS FINALLY OVERRIDDEN

BREAKING NEWS
From the Editor of the Blog World Report

The U.S. Senate has voted to hand President Bush his first veto override, on a $23 billion water projects bill.  After refusing to stand up to Bush on the war, embryonic stem-cell research and SCHIPs, the Senate finally mustered up the courage to tell George W. Bush to shove it!  Perhaps they're growing a spine - or perhaps there are some Republicans out there who realize they only have less than a year to start kowtowing to their citizens before they get their asses booted out of a job!

Victory is Ours, Err, Mine!
From Comandante Agi for Agitprop

[Comandante Agí here, in for Blogenfreude who's still out with the flu. Check me out at my new group blog Guys From Area 51 - yes that was a blatant shameless plug. Sorry...]

Lieberman_mr_fish

Look who crawled out of his cave to offer an astute observation:

“I’m proud to say that the tide has turned in Iraq and we’re winning that war,” Lieberman said. “And if we don’t let down our troops, they’re going to bring home a victory that will protect us here at home from today’s threat — totalitarian terrorist Islamism that’s trying to take our liberty from us.”

Yeah, that war. 'Cos we got to get ready for the next war, right N-Pod?

That war is going so well that Baghdad is now a top tourist destination. Just ask Fred Kagan, he's been there!

Now, just for fun, try saying "totalitarian terrorist Islamism" ten times fast!

"Investors agree: Anything but the dollar"
From John Aravosis for
AMERICABlog


Our country is in serious trouble. Under George Bush and the Republicans we not only lost our leadership as the moral standard-bearer of the world, we now risk losing our leadership as the financial bedrock of the world. People no longer have confidence in America. And all of the republicans' flag-waving and "we're number one!" slogans have done nothing to fix some very serious problems that they've caused and ignored. We can't go on like this. Pretending that we're winning in Iraq, pretending that we don't have a health care crisis, pretending that global warming doesn't exist, pretending that massive federal budget deficits don't matter because lowering taxes supposedly makes money (even though Reagan and Bush have now both broken the budget by lowering taxes). We can't keep pretending that everything is okay when it's not, simply because the Republicans are afraid to admit that they've royally screwed up our country.

From the International Herald Tribune:
In short, markets appeared firmly in the grip of a mood that seemed to scream for any investment other than the dollar, a reflection of a broad lack of confidence in a U.S. economy that could not seem to put the subprime mortgage crisis behind it. Unusually, powerful new Chinese investors appeared to endorse the idea that the U.S. currency was bound to fade as a result.

The European Central Bank seems set to stand by the strong euro when it meets Thursday to set interest rates - offering a credible alternative to a U.S. currency that now seems less indispensable than it has in some time.....

"We are experiencing among our clients an awakening that the United States is in big trouble," said Erik Nielsen, chief Europe economist at Goldman Sachs. "It is not just the mortgage market."

Rep. Wexler Will Urge House Judiciary Committee to Hold Hearings on Impeachment
From Christopher for From the Left

Too bad this isn’t a frontpage story in the AP, Reuters, Pravda and WaPo.

As reported by David Swanson, in the wake of yesterday’s wild ride on the House floor concerning the privileged resolution filed by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), calling for the Impeachment of Dick Cheney.

The following is from a letter sent to constituents today by Rep. Robert Wexler (D-FL), a member of the House Judiciary Committee, where the matter has been sent again. Wexler is calling for the committee “to schedule impeachment hearings immediately and not let this issue languish as it has over the last six months.”

I share your belief that Vice President Cheney must answer for his deceptive actions in office, particularly with regard to the preparations for the Iraq war and the revelation of the identity of covert agent Valerie Plame Wilson as part of political retribution against her husband. That is why I voted against the motion to table debate on H.Res. 333. Along with only 85 other Democrats, I opposed tabling the measure and supported beginning immediate debate and a vote on the Cheney impeachment resolution. The vote on tabling the Kucinich resolution was rejected, and the House subsequently voted to refer the matter to the Judiciary Committee.

The American people are served well with a legitimate and thorough impeachment inquiry. I will urge the Judiciary Committee to schedule impeachment hearings immediately and not let this issue languish as it has over the last six months. Only through hearings can we bring begin to correct the abuses of Dick Cheney and the Bush Administration; and, if it is determined in these hearings that Vice President Cheney has committed High Crimes and Misdemeanors, he should be impeached and removed from office.

Rush Limbaugh us at it again
From Larry Sadler for Let's Talk

Rush Limbaugh must really get his kicks from trying to hurt our kids, especially if they are talking against anything that he believes in.

Keith Olbermann talked about the shameful ways Limbaugh has disrespected our younger generation kids. Is he still on drugs?

Olbermann shows video of Rush attacking a 18-year-old Inuit from Alaska who was sobbing through her congressional testimony, while describing Global Warming's disastrous effects on her community.

Had this been a Democrat doing such a thing our Republicans would have had a field day destroying him for such action. How is it that this man continue to say what he pleases to and about our kids and gets away with it?
 

Know a blog that deserves to be featured on the Blog World Report?  Contact Robert.

Sorry, but you need flash to view this video


Wanted: A Different Strain of Leadership
From Colby Natale for Montana Netroots

One of the recurring themes this election season has been a favorite of Republican front  runners Rudy Guiliani and Mitt Romney; executive experience.  I can’t count the number of times that one of them has attacked an opponent, Republican or Democrat, by remind us that said person “never ran a _____”.  For Guiliani, the statement normally reads “he has never run a city”, while for Romney ’state’ normally replaces city in that tired reminder.  In fact, Romney was at it again recently while speaking about Hillary Clinton:

“She hasn’t run a corner store. She hasn’t run a state. She hasn’t run a city,” he says. “And the idea that she could learn to be president as an internship just doesn’t make any sense.”

The emphasis is mine to show the alliterative nature of his executive claims.

Of course, both men do this for two reasons.  One, to claim that their opponent lacks the necessary leadership qualities to do the job.  However, and fare more important, these statements are used as a tactic implication that only someone with their kind of executive experience (read: running a state or large city) is fit to be president.  They feel that you need all kinds of experience “running” things before you qualify as Presidential material, and that is where I take issue.

I don’t want my President to act like a business owner; where everything is about increasing the bottom line.  People get left behind under leaders like that, because people are evaluated as expendable currency.

I don’t want my President to act like a career-politican, even if that is a requisite for the job.  There is a perception that politicans have to forfeit every belief they have to make it in Washington, and that kind of mentality is not going to heal this country’s political issues.

I don’t want my President to act like he/she deserves the job because he/she has mastered the art of “running” things.  People with that much ‘leadership’ experience talk a big game, but seem to forgotten how best to lead; by example.  I want a leader who wants to work with people; not lead them to the promised land.

I don’t want my President to get the job as a bloated promotion.  Who cares that you were major or governor, that doesn’t mean you get to move up the ladder.  Romney:  you have taken the accomplishments of the state you ‘led’ and sacrificed them on the altar of Family Values, so why should I care about the experience you so easily disavow? Giuliani, you have attempted to parlay a national disaster into the notion that you have valid ‘Foreign Affairs’ experience.  Why should I support someone so willing to bend human tragedy to his will?

Nope, this isn’t going to fly.  We need someone who knows that actions speak louder than words; especially tired, worn out words.  We need the a President who will be honored to do the job, rather than feel that they have finally earned their due.  It is time for our President to stop “running” everything and start working for the people who elect him/her.

Candidates: remember who works for who, the next time you talk about “running” the country.

Watch this video
I was led to this video by
Nancy Nall

Huh! For All the Good It Did --
From Two Crows for Preserve, Protect and Defend

A few weeks ago I wrote my Senators and Representative [again] begging them to get on the ball and impeach Cheney.
Soon thereafter I received an email from my 'Democratic' Senator saying, 'Don't you worry your pretty little head about such matters -- leave the decisions to us grown-ups who understand such things.'

Then, this morning, I received an absolute brush-off from my [Republican] representative. He didn't even mention the impeachment issue at all -- he simply 'thanked' me for my letter using a full sheet of paper, an envelope, and ink to do it with along with the gasoline used for its delivery.
Now, THAT was a complete waste of resources merely to say, 'I know you won't vote for me anyway, so the hell with you and the hell with the Constitution which, by the way, I swore to uphold and defend. But, what's a little oath before God when important issues are at stake -- like paying back my corporate backers?'

Full text of both letters and my reply to Senator Nelson are below.
There's no point in responding to Bilirakis as you'll see.
^^^
Dear Ms. C_____:

Thank you for informing me of your views. Many Americans would agree that certain actions taken by this Administration warrant impeachment.

While I’m also frustrated by the failures of the White House in both foreign and domestic policy, such action would be impractical. The president’s and vice president’s terms conclude next year. In the months immediately ahead, I believe the officials in Washington need to focus on working across the aisle to get results on the major challenges facing our country--not only on Iraq, but also on health care coverage and retirement security for all Americans.

I appreciate hearing your thoughts. Please do not hesitate to contact me again.

Sincerely,
Bill Nelson
xxx
I took him at his word and sent him this:

Dear Senator Nelson:
I recently wrote you concerning impeachment of Vice President Cheney and President Bush.

You wrote me back--and thank you for the letter. I could not forgo one response.

I'm aware that it is never convenient to impeach an administration. However, these are not normal times. When our Constitution is daily being shredded and we are on the verge of being taken into yet another war on false pretenses, some sort of action must be taken.

Your argument that this is not a convenient time is simply not sufficient right now.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
^^^
Then, this morning, I received this:

Dear A______:
[and btw-- I hadn't been aware I was on a first-name basis with this man. I used his title when I wrote to him.]

Thank you for contacting me to share your thoughts on the Republican leadership. I appreciate hearing from you.

As a resident of Florida's Ninth District, your comments and opinions are an important source of information to help me carry out my duties as your federal representative. In that regard, please do no hesitate to contact me in the future on any issue important to you. Also, if you would like to be informed more frequently about my work in Congress and in Florida's Ninth Congressional District, please visit my website at *** to sign up for regular email or to send me a message.

Again, thank you for sharing your thoughts with me.

Sincerely yours,
Gus M. Bilirakis
Member of Congress
^^^
Well, what can I say?
I've known for years that the era of representative government was past.
I just hadn't expected to have my nose rubbed in it quite as flagrantly as this.

Introducing Kash Cooper and Legendary Press - Now with links that work!
From FranIAm

Please allow me to take a brief break from politics, snark and whatever other narcissistic and lunatic ramblings you find here, to introduce a blog, a business, a man. And also a chance for you to participate if you want a new creative outlet.

Kash Cooper is starting a comics publishing business. Please check out his blog which will give you info and updates. The blog will also provide links to Legendary Press, which is the business website.

In Kash's own words...

The foundation of any comic book starts with a story; a story that must first be written. To begin our talent search, we are going to focus on writers. We are looking for pro / semi-pro writers looking to make that big break into comics.
Read the talent search post for more info.

And if nothing else, go give my man Kash a big shout out and wish him luck as he embarks on this new adventure!

"Ah’m supposed to say what to Froggie…”
From Tengrain for Mock, Paper, Scissors

U.S. President George W. Bush (L) turns to talk to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice (R) and Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson, as they prepare to board the Marine One helicopter outside the White House for a trip to meet French President Nicolas Sarkozy at Mt. Vernon, Virginia, November 7, 2007. REUTERS/Mike Theiler (UNITED STATES)
REUTERS/Mike Theiler (UNITED STATES)

“…voulez-vouz crochet? I dun git it. Why y’all laughing at me?”

 

House Passes ENDA
From TomCat for Politics Plus

8ENDA_icon WASHINGTON, Nov. 7 — The House on Wednesday approved a bill granting broad protections against discrimination in the workplace for gay men, lesbians and bisexuals, a measure that supporters praised as the most important civil rights legislation since the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 but that opponents said would result in unnecessary lawsuits.

The bill, the Employment Nondiscrimination Act, is the latest version of legislation that Democrats have pursued since 1974. Representatives Edward I. Koch and Bella Abzug of New York then sought to protect gay men and lesbians with a measure they introduced on the fifth anniversary of the Stonewall Rebellion, the brawl between gay men and police officers at a bar in Greenwich Village that is widely viewed as the start of the American gay rights movement.

“On this proud day of the 110th Congress, we will chart a new direction for civil rights,” said Representative Kathy Castor, a Florida Democrat and a gay rights advocate, in a speech before the vote. “On this proud day, the Congress will act to ensure that all Americans are granted equal rights in the work place.”...

Inserted from <NY Times>

This is definitely a step in the right direction, and news from the Senate is that it's likely to pass there early next year.  However, it does sadden me to report that there actually were Democrats who voted against this bill.  Here is a list of these DINO hypocrites:

John Barrow, Marion Berry, Yvette Clarke, Bud Cramer, Artur Davis, Lincoln Davis, Chet Edwards, Bart Gordon, Rush Holt, Nicholas Lampson, Daniel Lipinski, Jim Marshall, Mike McIntyre, Charles Melancon, Michael Michaud, Jerrold Nadler, Nick Rahall, Mike Ross, Heath Shuler, Ike Skelton, John Tanner, Gene Taylor, Edolphus Towns, Nydia Velázquez, Anthony Weiner

War is only political if you're against it?
From Carol for Peace


It's almost Veteran's Day. Last year, many of us participated in Denver's Veteran's Day parade. Military Families Speak Out, Veterans for Peace, Iraq Veterans Against the War, and just ordinary supporters like me joined the rest of the vets (and Corvettes - don't ask me what they have to do with Veteran's Day) in the parade down Denver's streets.

This year, the following veterans and families of soldiers will not be allowed to participate in the parade because they are "making a political statement":

Veterans for Peace

Iraq Veterans Against the War
Military Families Speak Out
Gold Star Families for Peace
Vietnam Veterans Against the War
West Point Graduates Against the War
Colorado Veterans for America

Are we seeing patterns going on around this country???

Fox Attacks Decency...With Bill O'Reilly Leading The Way
From Cliff Schecter

Most of you are aware, and most likely have been for a while, that under the guise of "news" Fox has offered its viewers a steady stream of bias pertaining to social and political issues since its inception in 1996. From attacking Black America to pushing for war with Iran, from demonizing bloggers to distorting environmental issues, theirs is quite a record of achievement in propagating propaganda that is neither fair nor balanced.

Today we have a surprise (well at least it surprised all of us at BNF). Thanks to the terrific work of the News Hounds, we bring you Fox and ole' Billy O'Reilly attacking decency. Yes, you read that right. The self-righteous, pompous, bloviators who deign to lecture on how we should behave in our personal lives, are in fact exploiting women, pandering to the lowest common denominator and pushing smut out on the airwaves on a daily basis!

And this will definitely raise your hackles. YOU ARE PAYING FOR THIS! Yes, you read that right too. So watch the video and pass it along to your friends, acquaintances and anyone else not aleady spun by the "No Spin Zone." We simply must let the FCC know we are mad as hell about having their smut in our homes and being forced to pay for it. And we're simply not going to take it anymore.

US Tax Dollars NOT Spent on Homeless Veterans - Words Are Cheaper
From Boss Kitty for BlueBloggin

1 Out of 4 Homeless Are Veterans

WASHINGTON — Veterans make up one in four homeless people in the United States, though they are only 11 percent of the general adult population, according to a report to be released Thursday.And homelessness is not just a problem among middle-age and elderly veterans. Younger veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan are trickling into shelters and soup kitchens seeking services, treatment or help with finding a job.

The Veterans Affairs Department has identified 1,500 homeless veterans from the current wars and says 400 of them have participated in its programs specifically targeting homelessness.

The National Alliance to End Homelessness, a public education nonprofit, based the findings of its report on numbers from Veterans Affairs and the Census Bureau. 2005 data estimated that 194,254 homeless people out of 744,313 on any given night were veterans.

In comparison, the VA says that 20 years ago, the estimated number of veterans who were homeless on any given night was 250,000.

Some advocates say the early presence of veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan at shelters does not bode well for the future. It took roughly a decade for the lives of Vietnam veterans to unravel to the point that they started showing up among the homeless. Advocates worry that intense and repeated deployments leave newer veterans particularly vulnerable.

hlogo1931.gif

VA offers a wide array of special programs and initiatives specifically designed to help homeless veterans live as self-sufficiently and independently as possible. In fact,VA is the only Federal agency that provides substantial hands-on assistance directly to homeless persons. Although limited to veterans and their dependents, VA’s major homeless-specific programs constitute the largest integrated network of homeless treatment and assistance services in the country.

VA’s specialized homeless veterans treatment programs have grown and developed since they were first authorized in 1987. The programs strive to offer a continuum of services that include:

  • aggressive outreach to those veterans living on streets and in shelters who otherwise would not seek assistance;
  • clinical assessment and referral to needed medical treatment for physical and psychiatric disorders, including substance abuse;
  • long-term sheltered transitional assistance, case management, and rehabilitation;
  • employment assistance and linkage with available income supports; and
  • supported permanent housing.

If the existing Veterans Services was successful, there wouldn’t be 1 veteran for every 4 homeless persons accounted for. You know, accounted for are the operative words here. I took the liberty of re-printing a piece of an Op-Ed by David W. Gorman, Washington HQ Executive Director, of Disabled American Veterans:

Here’s the truth about the human cost borne by the troops in Iraq and Afghanistan as shown by data from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Of the 1.5 million troops who served in Iraq or Afghanistan, 720,000 (48%) are now veterans in the civilian population. Of these, 202,000 have filed claims for VA disability benefits. The VA granted benefits in more than 90% of the cases processed so far, and will grant more upon appeal or presentation of additional evidence. In other words, real statistics show that one out of four veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan is disabled in military service. This should shock no one as troops return to the war zones for their third, fourth, and now fifth tours of combat duty.

Why is the US Government so adept at breaking things and so incompetent at fixing what it broke. This is a basic premise for civilizations. Responsibility for actions and accountability to your population. This appears to be lost on this American Government. Take what it can. Use it until it breaks. Throw it away and find another. That’s not how it is supposed to work. That is childish, spoiled bully thinking. We reap what we sow. We have sown a sick system. We need to take responsibility for our own actions before we can expect the same from those we elect. Elect we must.

All BossKitty asks is that you pay close attention to the decision you make that will determine the fate of our world. These homeless veterans all have something in common. They trusted the American Government system. They put themselves in harms way at the order of the government. The government puts a complicated system in place that works OK only if you can navigate it. Every chance it gets, the government makes it nearly impossible to keep up with the human destruction it has wrought. These homeless veterans are now fighting to survive at home.

Hugs!  Not Biological Weapons
By Karen for Namaste'

Bush mentality: fighting is IN... hugging is OUT!!

MASCOUTAH, Ill. - Two hugs equals two days of detention for 13-year-old Megan Coulter.

The eighth-grader was punished for violating a school policy banning public displays of affection when she hugged two friends Friday.

“I feel it is crazy,” said Megan, who was to serve her second detention Tuesday after classes at Mascoutah Middle School.

“I was just giving them a hug goodbye for the weekend,” she said.

Megan’s mother, Melissa Coulter, said the embraces weren’t even real hugs — just an arm around the shoulder and slight squeeze.

“It’s hilarious to the point of ridicule,” Coulter said. “I’m still dumbfounded that she’s having to do this.”

District Superintendent Sam McGowen said that he thinks the penalty is fair and that administrators in the school east of St. Louis were following policy in the student handbook.

It states: “Displays of affection should not occur on the school campus at any time. It is in poor taste, reflects poor judgment, and brings discredit to the school and to the persons involved.”

Coulter said she and her husband told their daughter to go ahead and serve her detentions because the only other option was a day of suspension for each skipped detention.

“We don’t agree with it, but I certainly don’t want her to get in more trouble,” Coulter said.

The couple plan to attend the next school board meeting to ask board members to consider rewording the policy or be more specific in what is considered a display of affection.

“I’m just hoping the school board will open their eyes and just realize that maybe they shouldn’t be punishing us for hugs,” Megan said.

Chimpy’s “Klan Plan” For the Civil Rights Commission
From Jolly Roger for
Reconstitution 2.0

Chimpy's Buds
Even Worse

There has always been conservotard code for the segregation the cretins want to reimpose on the country. It will be couched in terms like “traditional values,” and “not legislating from the bench,” to name just a couple. The wingtard meme goes something like this: in America today, minorities and women are getting “special rights” that white men never had, so some “balance” is needed to level things. In reality, of course, this is utter and complete bullshit, and is easily refuted on so many levels that only someone blinded by irrational fear and hatred would buy into it.

Chimpy’s “base” is comprised of precisely such people. They are so full of hatred for “them” that they hardly seem to notice that their own station in life has declined dramatically since their monkey got appointed to office in 2001.  As long as “they” are faring even worse, the venomous Chimpy base will continue to heap praise on the moronic monkey. Every single one of the present Gopper pack of candidates is also trying to craft a message of hatred that will fire up the wingtards and get them out to the Primaries. Rudy Giuliani has managed to talk enough hatred to gain the endorsement of Pat Robertson, who said that the city that Rudy ran brought the WTC attack on itself. I would love to hear Rudy or one of his supporters try to equivocate THAT one.

I know you’re probably tired of seeing me post this, but I’m going to do so again. The 2004 campaign against American citizens was intended to let racists be racists. They said “gay marriage,” but “Jim Crow” was always the intent. When you begin to persecute people for no reason other than you don’t like the way they live, you’re opening the door for persecuting ANYONE who doesn’t fit your worldview. The simple fact of the matter is that gay Americans had committed no greater “crime” than Black Americans, or Jewish Americans, or Native Americans. Whether or not you agree with the way a gay person lives doesn’t mean shit; a whole lot of people probably don’t agree with how YOU live. As long as you’re harming no one else and everyone involved is of age and consents to what is going on, then I don’t have a damned thing to say about how you live, and you don’t have a leg to stand on if you’re thinking of criticizing ME. The gay marriage initiatives on ballot after ballot were basically crowbars for tearing down 50 years of civil rights progress in this country. The people who pushed these initiatives knew all too well who would support them, and what the real underlying purpose was all along. If you can get gay marriage banned today, maybe you can get Arab-Caucasian marriage banned tomorrow on the basis of “terrorism.” It makes at least as much sense as banning gay marriage because it “threatens” a “traditional” family.

Chimpy overtly pandered to these prejudices in 2004, but he’s not all pander. Chimpy’s pursued a nakedly racist course since the day of his appointment, and I don’t think there’s a better example of that than the way he’s destroyed the Civil Rights Commission. Chimpy didn’t like the way the panel was doing things (as in, investigating discrimination instead of extolling it,) so he made up his own new rule and packed it with people more in line with his own racist thinking. Now the Civil Rights Commission sounds as if “Bull” Connor writes their opinions.

Anyone who can read this and still try to argue that the moronic monkey isn’t a racist isn’t even worth talking to. And no, his drilling of Condoliesalot Rice does NOT prove he’s not a racist. I’m from the South; I assure you that many a Klansman has enjoyed a round or two in Black brothels.

The US Commission on Civil Rights, the nation’s 50-year-old watchdog for racism and discrimination, has become a critic of school desegregation efforts and affirmative action ever since the Bush administration used a controversial maneuver to put the agency under conservative control.

Democrats say the move to create a conservative majority on the eight-member panel violated the spirit of a law requiring that no more than half the commission be of one party. Critics say Bush in effect installed a fifth and sixth Republican on the panel in December 2004, after two commissioners, both Republicans when appointed, reregistered as independents.

“I don’t believe that [the law] was meant to be evaded by conveniently switching your voter registration,” said Commissioner Michael Yaki, one of the two remaining Democrats.

The administration insists that Bush’s appointments were consistent with the law because the two commissioners who reregistered as independents no longer counted as Republicans. The day before Bush made the appointments, the Department of Justice approved the move in a memo to White House counsel Alberto Gonzales’s office.

Other presidents have been able to create a majority of like-minded commissioners, but no president has done it this way. The unusual circumstances surrounding the appointments attracted little attention at the time. But they have had a sweeping effect, shifting the commission’s emphasis from investigating claims of civil rights violations to questioning programs designed to offset the historic effects of discrimination.

Before the changes, the agency had planned to evaluate a White House budget request for civil rights enforcement, the adequacy of college financial aid for minorities, and whether the US Census Bureau undercounts minorities, keeping nonwhite areas from their fair share of political apportionment and spending. After the appointments, the commission canceled the projects.

Instead, the commission has put out a series of reports concluding that there is little educational benefit to integrating elementary and secondary schools, calling for closer scrutiny of programs that help minorities gain admission to top law schools, and urging the government to look for ways to replace policies that help minority-owned businesses win contracts with race-neutral alternatives.

The conservative bloc has also pushed through retroactive term limits for several of its state advisory committees. As a result, some longtime traditional civil rights activists have had to leave the advisory panels, and the commission replaced several of them with conservative activists.

The commission has also stopped issuing subpoenas and going on the road to hold lengthy fact-finding hearings, as it previously did about once a year. The commission had three planned hearings in the works when the conservative bloc took over and canceled them. Instead, the panel has held only shorter briefings, all but one of which was in Washington, from invited specialists.

Read the whole article. It’ll piss you off, unless you’re a Chimpleton. In that case, you’ll be cheering about them dark types getting what’s coming to ‘em.

Click here to comment on this Blog World Report