We'll never claim to be fair and
balanced, just honest and trustworthy
November 8, 2007
A
GEORGE BUSH VETO IS FINALLY OVERRIDDEN
BREAKING NEWS
From the Editor of the Blog World
Report
The U.S. Senate has voted to hand President Bush
his first veto override, on a $23 billion water projects bill. After
refusing to stand up to Bush on the war, embryonic stem-cell research and
SCHIPs, the Senate finally mustered up the courage to tell George W. Bush
to shove it! Perhaps they're growing a spine - or perhaps there are
some Republicans out there who realize they only have less than a year to
start kowtowing to their citizens before they get their asses booted out
of a job!
Victory is Ours,
Err, Mine!
From Comandante Agi for Agitprop
[Comandante Agí here, in for Blogenfreude who's still out
with the flu. Check me out at my new group blog Guys
From Area 51 - yes that was a blatant shameless plug.
Sorry...]
“I’m proud to say that the tide has turned in
Iraq and we’re winning that war,” Lieberman
said. “And if we don’t let down our troops, they’re
going to bring home a victory that will protect us here at
home from today’s threat — totalitarian terrorist
Islamism that’s trying to take our liberty from us.”
Yeah, that war. 'Cos we got to get ready for the next
war, right
N-Pod?
Now, just for fun, try saying "totalitarian terrorist
Islamism" ten times fast!
"Investors agree: Anything but the
dollar"
From John Aravosis for AMERICABlog
Our country is in
serious trouble. Under George Bush and the Republicans we not
only lost our leadership as the moral standard-bearer of the
world, we now risk losing our leadership as the financial
bedrock of the world. People no longer have confidence in
America. And all of the republicans' flag-waving and "we're
number one!" slogans have done nothing to fix some very
serious problems that they've caused and ignored. We can't go on
like this. Pretending that we're winning in Iraq, pretending
that we don't have a health care crisis, pretending that global
warming doesn't exist, pretending that massive federal budget
deficits don't matter because lowering taxes supposedly makes
money (even though Reagan and Bush have now both broken the
budget by lowering taxes). We can't keep pretending that
everything is okay when it's not, simply because the Republicans
are afraid to admit that they've royally screwed up our country.
In short, markets
appeared firmly in the grip of a mood that seemed to scream
for any investment other than the dollar, a reflection of a
broad lack of confidence in a U.S. economy that could not seem
to put the subprime mortgage crisis behind it. Unusually,
powerful new Chinese investors appeared to endorse the idea
that the U.S. currency was bound to fade as a result.
The European Central Bank seems set to stand by the strong
euro when it meets Thursday to set interest rates - offering a
credible alternative to a U.S. currency that now seems less
indispensable than it has in some time.....
"We are experiencing among our clients an awakening that
the United States is in big trouble," said Erik Nielsen,
chief Europe economist at Goldman Sachs. "It is not just
the mortgage market."
Rep. Wexler Will Urge House Judiciary
Committee to Hold Hearings on Impeachment
From Christopher for From
the Left
Too bad this isn’t a frontpage
story in the AP, Reuters, Pravda and WaPo.
As reported by David Swanson, in the wake of
yesterday’s wild ride on the House floor concerning the
privileged resolution filed by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH),
calling for the Impeachment of Dick Cheney.
The following is from a letter sent to constituents today
by Rep. Robert Wexler (D-FL), a member of the House
Judiciary Committee, where the matter has been sent again.
Wexler is calling for the committee “to schedule
impeachment hearings immediately and not let this issue
languish as it has over the last six months.”
I share your belief that Vice
President Cheney must answer for his deceptive actions in
office, particularly with regard to the preparations for
the Iraq war and the revelation of the identity of covert
agent Valerie Plame Wilson as part of political
retribution against her husband. That is why I voted
against the motion to table debate on H.Res. 333. Along
with only 85 other Democrats, I opposed tabling the
measure and supported beginning immediate debate and a
vote on the Cheney impeachment resolution. The vote on
tabling the Kucinich resolution was rejected, and the
House subsequently voted to refer the matter to the
Judiciary Committee.
The American people are served
well with a legitimate and thorough impeachment inquiry. I
will urge the Judiciary Committee to schedule impeachment
hearings immediately and not let this issue languish as it
has over the last six months. Only through hearings can we
bring begin to correct the abuses of Dick Cheney and the
Bush Administration; and, if it is determined in these
hearings that Vice President Cheney has committed High
Crimes and Misdemeanors, he should be impeached and
removed from office.
Rush Limbaugh us at it again
From Larry Sadler for Let's
Talk
Rush Limbaugh must really get his kicks from trying to hurt
our kids, especially if they are talking against anything
that he believes in.
Keith Olbermann talked about the shameful ways Limbaugh has
disrespected our younger generation kids. Is he still on
drugs?
Olbermann shows video of Rush attacking a 18-year-old Inuit
from Alaska who was sobbing through her congressional
testimony, while describing Global Warming's disastrous
effects on her community.
Had this been a Democrat doing such a thing our Republicans
would have had a field day destroying him for such action.
How is it that this man continue to say what he pleases to
and about our kids and gets away with it?
Know a blog that
deserves to be featured on the Blog World Report? Contact Robert.
Wanted: A Different Strain of Leadership
From Colby Natale for Montana
Netroots
One of the recurring themes this election season has been a
favorite of Republican front runners Rudy Guiliani and Mitt
Romney; executive experience. I can’t count the number of
times that one of them has attacked an opponent, Republican or
Democrat, by remind us that said person “never ran a _____”.
For Guiliani, the statement normally reads “he has never run a
city”, while for Romney ’state’ normally replaces city in that
tired reminder. In fact, Romney was at it again recently while
speaking about Hillary Clinton:
“She hasn’t run a corner store. She
hasn’t run a state. She hasn’t run a
city,” he says. “And the idea that she could learn to be
president as an internship just doesn’t make any sense.”
The emphasis is mine to show the alliterative nature of his
executive claims.
Of course, both men do this for two reasons. One, to claim
that their opponent lacks the necessary leadership qualities to do
the job. However, and fare more important, these statements
are used as a tactic implication that only someone with their kind
of executive experience (read: running a state or large city) is fit
to be president. They feel that you need all kinds of
experience “running” things before you qualify as Presidential
material, and that is where I take issue.
I don’t want my President to act like a business owner; where
everything is about increasing the bottom line. People get
left behind under leaders like that, because people are evaluated as
expendable currency.
I don’t want my President to act like a career-politican, even
if that is a requisite for the job. There is a perception that
politicans have to forfeit every belief they have to make it in
Washington, and that kind of mentality is not going to heal this
country’s political issues.
I don’t want my President to act like he/she deserves the job
because he/she has mastered the art of “running” things.
People with that much ‘leadership’ experience talk a big game,
but seem to forgotten how best to lead; by example. I want a
leader who wants to work with people; not lead them to the promised
land.
I don’t want my President to get the job as a bloated
promotion. Who cares that you were major or governor, that
doesn’t mean you get to move up the ladder. Romney:
you have taken the accomplishments of the state you ‘led’ and
sacrificed them on the altar of Family Values, so why should I care
about the experience you so easily disavow? Giuliani, you have
attempted to parlay a national disaster into the notion that you
have valid ‘Foreign Affairs’ experience. Why should I
support someone so willing to bend human tragedy to his will?
Nope, this isn’t going to fly. We need someone who knows
that actions speak louder than words; especially tired, worn out
words. We need the a President who will be honored to do the
job, rather than feel that they have finally earned their due.
It is time for our President to stop “running” everything and
start working for the people who elect him/her.
Candidates: remember who works for who, the
next time you talk about “running” the country.
Watch this
video
I was led to this video by Nancy
Nall
A few weeks ago I wrote my Senators and Representative [again]
begging them to get on the ball and impeach Cheney.
Soon thereafter I received an email from my 'Democratic' Senator
saying, 'Don't you worry your pretty little head about such
matters -- leave the decisions to us grown-ups who understand such
things.'
Then, this morning, I received an absolute brush-off from my
[Republican] representative. He didn't even mention the
impeachment issue at all -- he simply 'thanked' me for my letter
using a full sheet of paper, an envelope, and ink to do it with
along with the gasoline used for its delivery.
Now, THAT was a complete waste of resources merely to say, 'I know
you won't vote for me anyway, so the hell with you and the hell
with the Constitution which, by the way, I swore to uphold and
defend. But, what's a little oath before God when important issues
are at stake -- like paying back my corporate backers?'
Full text of both letters and my reply to Senator Nelson are
below.
There's no point in responding to Bilirakis as you'll see.
^^^
Dear Ms. C_____:
Thank you for informing me of your views. Many Americans would
agree that certain actions taken by this Administration warrant
impeachment.
While I’m also frustrated by the failures of the White House in
both foreign and domestic policy, such action would be
impractical. The president’s and vice president’s terms
conclude next year. In the months immediately ahead, I believe the
officials in Washington need to focus on working across the aisle
to get results on the major challenges facing our country--not
only on Iraq, but also on health care coverage and retirement
security for all Americans.
I appreciate hearing your thoughts. Please do not hesitate to
contact me again.
Sincerely,
Bill Nelson
xxx
I took him at his word and sent him this:
Dear Senator Nelson:
I recently wrote you concerning impeachment of Vice President
Cheney and President Bush.
You wrote me back--and thank you for the letter. I could not forgo
one response.
I'm aware that it is never convenient to impeach an
administration. However, these are not normal times. When our
Constitution is daily being shredded and we are on the verge of
being taken into yet another war on false pretenses, some sort of
action must be taken.
Your argument that this is not a convenient time is simply not
sufficient right now.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
^^^
Then, this morning, I received this:
Dear A______:
[and btw-- I hadn't been aware I was on a first-name basis with
this man. I used his
title when I wrote to him.]
Thank you for contacting me to share your thoughts on the
Republican leadership. I appreciate hearing from you.
As a resident of Florida's Ninth District, your comments and
opinions are an important source of information to help me carry
out my duties as your federal representative. In that regard,
please do no hesitate to contact me in the future on any issue
important to you. Also, if you would like to be informed more
frequently about my work in Congress and in Florida's Ninth
Congressional District, please visit my website at *** to sign up
for regular email or to send me a message.
Again, thank you for sharing your thoughts with me.
Sincerely yours,
Gus M. Bilirakis
Member of Congress
^^^
Well, what can I say?
I've known for years that the era of representative government was
past.
I just hadn't expected to have my nose rubbed in it quite as
flagrantly as this.
Introducing Kash Cooper and Legendary
Press - Now with links that work!
From FranIAm
Please
allow me to take a brief break from politics, snark
and whatever other narcissistic and lunatic
ramblings you find here, to introduce a blog, a
business, a man. And also a chance for you to
participate if you want a new creative outlet.
Kash Cooper is starting a comics publishing
business. Please check out his blog
which will give you info and updates. The blog will
also provide links to Legendary
Press, which is the business website.
In Kash's own words...
The
foundation of any comic book starts with a story;
a story that must first be written.To
begin our talent search, we are going to focus on
writers. We are looking for pro / semi-pro writers
looking to make that big break into comics.
WASHINGTON, Nov. 7 — The House on Wednesday approved a bill
granting broad protections against discrimination in the workplace
for gay men, lesbians and bisexuals, a measure that supporters
praised as the most important civil rights legislation since the
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 but that opponents said
would result in unnecessary lawsuits.
The bill, the Employment Nondiscrimination Act, is the latest
version of legislation that Democrats have pursued since 1974.
Representatives Edward I. Koch and Bella Abzug of New York then
sought to protect gay men and lesbians with a measure they
introduced on the fifth anniversary of the Stonewall Rebellion, the
brawl between gay men and police officers at a bar in Greenwich
Village that is widely viewed as the start of the American gay
rights movement.
“On this proud day of the 110th Congress, we will chart a new
direction for civil rights,” said Representative Kathy Castor, a
Florida Democrat and a gay rights advocate, in a speech before the
vote. “On this proud day, the Congress will act to ensure that all
Americans are granted equal rights in the work place.”...
This is definitely a step in the right
direction, and news from the Senate is that it's likely to pass
there early next year. However, it does sadden me to report
that there actually were Democrats who voted against this bill.
Here is a list of these DINO hypocrites:
John Barrow, Marion Berry, Yvette
Clarke, Bud Cramer, Artur Davis, Lincoln Davis, Chet Edwards, Bart
Gordon, Rush Holt, Nicholas Lampson, Daniel Lipinski, Jim Marshall,
Mike McIntyre, Charles Melancon, Michael Michaud, Jerrold Nadler,
Nick Rahall, Mike Ross, Heath Shuler, Ike Skelton, John Tanner, Gene
Taylor, Edolphus Towns, Nydia Velázquez, Anthony Weiner
War is only political if you're
against it?
From Carol
for Peace
It's
almost Veteran's Day. Last
year, many of us participated in Denver's Veteran's
Day parade. Military Families Speak Out, Veterans
for Peace, Iraq Veterans Against the War, and just
ordinary supporters like me joined the rest of the
vets (and Corvettes - don't ask me what they have to
do with Veteran's Day) in the parade down Denver's
streets.
Are we seeing patterns going on around this country???
Fox Attacks
Decency...With Bill O'Reilly Leading The Way
From Cliff
Schecter
Most of you are aware, and most likely have been
for a while, that under the guise of "news" Fox
has offered its viewers a steady stream of bias
pertaining to social and political issues since its
inception in 1996. From attacking Black America to
pushing for war with Iran, from demonizing bloggers to
distorting environmental issues, theirs is quite a
record of achievement in propagating propaganda that
is neither fair nor balanced.
Today we have a surprise (well at least it
surprised all of us at BNF). Thanks to the terrific
work of the News Hounds, we bring you Fox and ole' Billy
O'Reilly attacking decency. Yes, you read that
right. The
self-righteous, pompous, bloviators who deign to
lecture on how we should behave in our personal lives,
are in fact exploiting women, pandering
to the lowest common denominator and pushing smut
out on the airwaves on a daily basis!
And this will definitely raise your hackles. YOU
ARE PAYING FOR THIS! Yes, you read that right too. So
watch the video and pass it along to your friends,
acquaintances and anyone else not aleady spun by the
"No Spin Zone." We
simply must let the FCC know we are mad as hell
about having their smut in our homes and being forced
to pay for it. And we're simply not going to take it
anymore.
US Tax Dollars
NOT Spent on Homeless Veterans - Words Are Cheaper
From Boss Kitty for BlueBloggin
WASHINGTON
— Veterans make up one in four homeless people in
the United States, though they are only 11 percent
of the general adult population, according to a
report to be released Thursday.And
homelessness is not just a problem among middle-age
and elderly veterans. Younger veterans from Iraq and
Afghanistan are trickling into shelters and soup
kitchens seeking services, treatment or help with
finding a job.
The Veterans
Affairs Department has identified 1,500
homeless veterans from the current wars and says 400
of them have participated in its programs
specifically targeting homelessness.
The
National Alliance to End Homelessness, a public
education nonprofit, based the findings of its
report on numbers from Veterans Affairs and the
Census Bureau. 2005 data estimated that 194,254
homeless people out of 744,313 on any given night
were veterans.
In
comparison, the VA says that 20 years ago, the
estimated number of veterans who were homeless on
any given night was 250,000.
Some
advocates say the early presence of veterans from
Iraq and Afghanistan at shelters does not bode well
for the future. It took roughly a decade for the
lives of Vietnam veterans to unravel to the point
that they started showing up among the homeless.
Advocates worry that intense and repeated
deployments leave newer veterans particularly
vulnerable.
VA
offers a wide array of special programs and
initiatives specifically designed to help homeless
veterans live as self-sufficiently and independently
as possible. In fact,VA is the only Federal agency
that provides substantial hands-on assistance
directly to homeless persons. Although limited to
veterans and their dependents, VA’s major
homeless-specific programs constitute the largest
integrated network of homeless treatment and
assistance services in the country.
VA’s
specialized homeless veterans treatment programs
have grown and developed since they were first
authorized in 1987. The programs strive to offer a
continuum of services that include:
aggressive
outreach to those veterans living on streets and
in shelters who otherwise would not seek
assistance;
clinical
assessment and referral to needed medical
treatment for physical and psychiatric
disorders, including substance abuse;
long-term
sheltered transitional assistance, case
management, and rehabilitation;
employment
assistance and linkage with available income
supports; and
Here’s
the truth about the human cost borne by the troops
in Iraq and Afghanistan as shown by data from the
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Of the
1.5 million troops who served in Iraq or
Afghanistan, 720,000 (48%) are now veterans in the
civilian population. Of these, 202,000 have filed
claims for VA disability benefits. The VA granted
benefits in more than 90% of the cases processed
so far, and will grant more upon appeal or
presentation of additional evidence. In other
words, real statistics show that one out of four
veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan is disabled in
military service. This should shock no one as
troops return to the war zones for their third,
fourth, and now fifth tours of combat duty.
Why
is the US Government so adept at breaking things
and so incompetent at fixing what it broke. This
is a basic premise for civilizations.
Responsibility for actions and accountability to
your population. This appears to be lost on this
American Government. Take what it can. Use it
until it breaks. Throw it away and find another.
That’s not how it is supposed to work. That is
childish, spoiled bully thinking. We reap what we
sow. We have sown a sick system. We need to take
responsibility for our own actions before we can
expect the same from those we elect. Elect we
must.
All
BossKitty asks is that you pay close attention to
the decision you make that will determine the fate
of our world. These homeless veterans all have
something in common. They trusted the American
Government system. They put themselves in harms
way at the order of the government. The government
puts a complicated system in place that works OK
only if you can navigate it. Every chance it gets,
the government makes it nearly impossible to keep
up with the human destruction it has wrought.
These homeless veterans are now fighting to
survive at home.
Hugs! Not
Biological Weapons
By Karen for Namaste'
Bush mentality: fighting is IN...
hugging is OUT!!
MASCOUTAH,
Ill. - Two hugs equals two days of
detention for 13-year-old Megan
Coulter.
The
eighth-grader was punished for
violating a school policy banning
public displays of affection when she
hugged two friends Friday.
“I
feel it is crazy,” said Megan, who
was to serve her second detention
Tuesday after classes at Mascoutah
Middle School.
“I
was just giving them a hug goodbye for
the weekend,” she said.
Megan’s
mother, Melissa Coulter, said the
embraces weren’t even real hugs —
just an arm around the shoulder and
slight squeeze.
“It’s
hilarious to the point of ridicule,”
Coulter said. “I’m still
dumbfounded that she’s having to do
this.”
District
Superintendent Sam McGowen said that
he thinks the penalty is fair and that
administrators in the school east of
St. Louis were following policy in the
student handbook.
It
states: “Displays of affection
should not occur on the school campus
at any time. It is in poor taste,
reflects poor judgment, and brings
discredit to the school and to the
persons involved.”
Coulter
said she and her husband told their
daughter to go ahead and serve her
detentions because the only other
option was a day of suspension for
each skipped detention.
“We
don’t agree with it, but I certainly
don’t want her to get in more
trouble,” Coulter said.
The
couple plan to attend the next school
board meeting to ask board members to
consider rewording the policy or be
more specific in what is considered a
display of affection.
“I’m
just hoping the school board will open
their eyes and just realize that maybe
they shouldn’t be punishing us for
hugs,” Megan said.
Chimpy’s “Klan
Plan” For the Civil Rights Commission
From Jolly Roger for Reconstitution
2.0
There has always been conservotard code for the
segregation the cretins want to reimpose on the
country. It will be couched in terms like
“traditional values,” and “not legislating
from the bench,” to name just a couple. The
wingtard meme goes something like this: in America
today, minorities and women are getting “special
rights” that white men never had, so some
“balance” is needed to level things. In reality,
of course, this is utter and complete bullshit, and
is easily refuted on so many levels that only
someone blinded by irrational fear and hatred would
buy into it.
Chimpy’s “base” is comprised of precisely
such people. They are so full of hatred for
“them” that they hardly seem to notice that
their own station in life has declined dramatically
since their monkey got appointed to office in 2001.
As long as “they” are faring even worse, the
venomous Chimpy base will continue to heap praise on
the moronic monkey. Every single one of the present
Gopper pack of candidates is also trying to craft a
message of hatred that will fire up the wingtards
and get them out to the Primaries. Rudy Giuliani has
managed to talk enough hatred to gain the
endorsement of Pat Robertson, who said that the city
that Rudy ran brought the WTC attack on itself. I
would love to hear Rudy or one of his supporters try
to equivocate THAT one.
I know you’re probably tired of seeing me post
this, but I’m going to do so again. The 2004
campaign against American citizens was intended to
let racists be racists. They said “gay
marriage,” but “Jim Crow” was always the
intent. When you begin to persecute people for no
reason other than you don’t like the way they
live, you’re opening the door for persecuting
ANYONE who doesn’t fit your worldview. The simple
fact of the matter is that gay Americans had
committed no greater “crime” than Black
Americans, or Jewish Americans, or Native Americans.
Whether or not you agree with the way a gay person
lives doesn’t mean shit; a whole lot of people
probably don’t agree with how YOU live. As long as
you’re harming no one else and everyone involved
is of age and consents to what is going on, then I
don’t have a damned thing to say about how you
live, and you don’t have a leg to stand on if
you’re thinking of criticizing ME. The gay
marriage initiatives on ballot after ballot were
basically crowbars for tearing down 50 years of
civil rights progress in this country. The people
who pushed these initiatives knew all too well who
would support them, and what the real underlying
purpose was all along. If you can get gay marriage
banned today, maybe you can get Arab-Caucasian
marriage banned tomorrow on the basis of
“terrorism.” It makes at least as much sense as
banning gay marriage because it “threatens” a
“traditional” family.
Chimpy overtly pandered to these prejudices in
2004, but he’s not all pander. Chimpy’s pursued
a nakedly racist course since the day of his
appointment, and I don’t think there’s a better
example of that than the way he’s destroyed the
Civil Rights Commission. Chimpy didn’t like the
way the panel was doing things (as in, investigating
discrimination instead of extolling it,) so he made
up his
own new rule and packed it with people more in
line with his own racist thinking. Now the Civil
Rights Commission sounds as if “Bull” Connor
writes their opinions.
Anyone who can read this and still try to argue
that the moronic monkey isn’t a racist isn’t
even worth talking to. And no, his drilling of
Condoliesalot Rice does NOT prove he’s not a
racist. I’m from the South; I assure you that many
a Klansman has enjoyed a round or two in Black
brothels.
The US Commission on Civil Rights, the
nation’s 50-year-old watchdog for racism and
discrimination, has become a critic of school
desegregation efforts and affirmative action ever
since the Bush administration used a controversial
maneuver to put the agency under conservative
control.
Democrats say the move to create a
conservative majority on the eight-member panel
violated the spirit of a law requiring that no
more than half the commission be of one party.
Critics say Bush in effect installed a fifth and
sixth Republican on the panel in December 2004,
after two commissioners, both Republicans when
appointed, reregistered as independents.
“I don’t believe that [the law] was
meant to be evaded by conveniently switching your
voter registration,” said Commissioner Michael
Yaki, one of the two remaining Democrats.
The administration insists that Bush’s
appointments were consistent with the law because
the two commissioners who reregistered as
independents no longer counted as Republicans. The
day before Bush made the appointments, the
Department of Justice approved the move in a memo
to White House counsel Alberto Gonzales’s
office.
Other presidents have been able to create a
majority of like-minded commissioners, but no
president has done it this way. The unusual
circumstances surrounding the appointments
attracted little attention at the time. But they
have had a sweeping effect, shifting the
commission’s emphasis from investigating claims
of civil rights violations to questioning programs
designed to offset the historic effects of
discrimination.
Before the changes, the agency had planned
to evaluate a White House budget request for civil
rights enforcement, the adequacy of college
financial aid for minorities, and whether the US
Census Bureau undercounts minorities, keeping
nonwhite areas from their fair share of political
apportionment and spending. After the
appointments, the commission canceled the
projects.
Instead, the commission has put out a
series of reports concluding that there is little
educational benefit to integrating elementary and
secondary schools, calling for closer scrutiny of
programs that help minorities gain admission to
top law schools, and urging the government to look
for ways to replace policies that help
minority-owned businesses win contracts with
race-neutral alternatives.
The conservative bloc has also pushed
through retroactive term limits for several of its
state advisory committees. As a result, some
longtime traditional civil rights activists have
had to leave the advisory panels, and the
commission replaced several of them with
conservative activists.
The commission has also stopped issuing
subpoenas and going on the road to hold lengthy
fact-finding hearings, as it previously did about
once a year. The commission had three planned
hearings in the works when the conservative bloc
took over and canceled them. Instead, the panel
has held only shorter briefings, all but one of
which was in Washington, from invited specialists.
Read the whole article. It’ll piss you off,
unless you’re a Chimpleton. In that case, you’ll
be cheering about them dark types getting what’s
coming to ‘em.