We'll never claim to be fair and balanced, just honest and trustworthy
November 12, 2007

Ewe Tell Me
From John Good for Left in Aboite

Another wild and woolly weekend wapped, err. . .wrapped up! Here's hoping that YOU didn't leap before looking. . .now caption this photo:

SF oil cleanup volunteers must take “loyalty oath”!!
From Jolly Roger for Reconstitution 2.0

How fucking bizarre is BushCo??

Since the heavy bunker fuel spewed from the Cosco Busan’s ruptured hull at 8:30 a.m. Wednesday, it has spread as far north as Tomales Bay, to nearly every surface of the San Francisco bay north of Hunter’s Point, west to the Farallon Islands, and south to Ocean Beach.

Hundreds of would-be oil spill cleanup volunteers who wanted to do something were told on Saturday in San Francisco to go home and do nothing.

Spilled oil is just too dangerous for ordinary citizens to clean up, the experts said.

The word came at an “informational session” for would-be volunteers at Bill Graham Civic Auditorium sponsored by the state Department of Fish and Game.

“Don’t go to the beach, don’t pick up tar balls, don’t touch wildlife,” said Yvonne Addassi, a wildlife director for the department. “We don’t want you to be in contact with the oil. It’s a hazardous substance.”

Scores of public-minded citizens who had shown up for the meeting - many wearing old clothes and gloves and ready for a messy day of hard work on the beach - were clearly confounded. The official announcement of the meeting said officials would tell “how the public can get trained.”

At the volunteer meeting, everyone at the gathering was given an official-looking state volunteer application to fill out, complete with a loyalty oath. The fish and game people said volunteers might be contacted later, for non-hazardous duties.

“It’s frustrating” said Ryan Gross of San Francisco. “I want to help, I don’t want to sit home and do nothing. But that’s what they told us to do.”

Addassi assured the crowd that dozens of official beach cleaners were at work around the Bay Area, but many people at the meeting reported going to oily beaches and seeing little or no official cleanup taking place.

After 90 minutes, Addassi said the “public class” for volunteers was over because she was late for her next public class in Richmond, where she was scheduled to tell another roomful of volunteers to go home and do nothing, too.

Meanwhile, a group of San Francisco surfer activists known as the Surfrider Foundation was urging its members to show up at Ocean Beach with “kitty litter scoops and heavy duty bags.” But Addassi said any ordinary citizen who came to the beach would be ordered to stop picking up goop and go home.

It was much the same in Marin County, where Sigward Moser led a 30-person volunteer group - including 20 monks-in-training from the Mill Valley Zen Center - onto Muir Beach on Friday. For his efforts, he was detained and handcuffed.

The little army managed to scoop up nearly 500 bags of gloppy, sandy oil between 2 and 5 p.m. Moser said it was easy duty: “It rolls up like kitty litter, right off the surface of the sand. Went right into the bags with no problem.”

They got almost all of the oil they could find - and then a National Park ranger showed up.

“He asked us to leave, and we said we needed to do what we were doing, so he put me in handcuffs,” said Moser, a communications consultant. “I told him, ‘Well, there was nobody else doing the cleanup before we began,’ but he just said I was breaking the law and this is hazardous material that I shouldn’t be dealing with.”

No doubt in stopping all but crony contractors from cleaning up the bay, BushCo will call this his “Healthy Seas” initiative.

Biden Works the Phones; Musharraf Secures Nukes; Bolton Scares Me
From Station Agent for Ice Station Tango

Not only is Biden funny, he's also useful.

From Huffington Post:

President Pervez Musharraf and opposition leader Benazir Bhutto each placed telephone calls from Pakistan to Democratic Sen. Joseph Biden, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, to discuss the country's crisis before either talked to President George W. Bush.

On Saturday, Bhutto emphasized to Biden the need for parliamentary elections in January with Gen. Musharraf remaining as president but leaving the army. Musharraf called Biden on Tuesday and asked that their conversation be kept confidential. Biden got the impression Musharraf could accept January elections although he had triggered the crisis by suspending the constitution.

(more)
You know who thinks the nukes in Pakistan are dangerously unsecure? John Bolton. Not sure wtf to make of that.

But don't worry Pervez Musharraf will hold elections in January. So everything will be fine. We can trust that guy, right?

Hey remember when that guy made peace with our enemies THE TALIBAN and AL-QAIDA? Me neither.

Liveblog with NC U.S. Senate candidate (and out gay man) Jim Neal
From Pam Spaulding for
The Bilerico Project

I've been telling folks why it's time to boot Senator Elizabeth Dole out of office for some time now. Never mind that I don't agree with her politics -- she's simply not doing the job she was elected to do -- represent and take care of the people of North Carolina. She's been inaccessible, no one seems to know when or if she's ever here (or on the Senate floor for that matter); her constituent services are rock bottom. The fact that she votes to affirm the interests of the Bush Administration is just rancid icing on the cake.

Just a few more reasons why Elizabeth Dole must go:

* Traditional marriage is something Republicans will defend. (Aug 2004)
* Freedom of religion, not freedom from religion. (Aug 2004)
* For school prayer & 10 Commandments in schools. (Oct 1999)
* Voted YES on recommending Constitutional ban on flag desecration. (Jun 2006)
* Voted YES on constitutional ban of same-sex marriage. (Jun 2006) 

In October Chapel Hill businessman and Dem fundraiser Jim Neal took questions from the North Carolina progressive community on BlueNC online town hall. It was there that he was asked about his sexual orientation. He disclosed it in a very matter-of-fact manner.

I've heard ...
Submitted by omega_star on Sat, 10/20/2007 -- 10:09am.
I've heard you're gay ...

Gay
Submitted by JimNeal on Sat, 10/20/2007 -- 10:18am.
I am indeed. No secret and no big deal to me -- I wouldn't be running if I didn't think otherwise.

The question asked frequently these days is whether a progressive, let alone an openly gay or lesbian politician can be elected to the U.S. Senate from North Carolina. Jim Neal says he can.

The party establishment, however, didn't seem equipped or publicly ready to deal with the fact that you were the only challenger out there, despite heavy attempts to recruit others to run (Congressman Brad Miller, State Rep. Grier Martin). The historic news that an openly gay man was running for the U.S. Senate, from a Southern state no less, was nowhere to be found on the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee web site, the state party was MIA. The local media coverage, in contrast, was fair and uncontroversial.

Jim Neal stopped by Pam's House Blend last night to do his first forum ever on an LGBT blog. It was a whirlwind hour of Q&A.

As liveblogging is a virtual speed session, and Jim Neal was peppered with a ton of questions on a wide range of issues -- not just LGBT ones -- I corrected typos for this summary.

On the treatment of veterans, and Dole's horrible record of supporting the troops:
No doubt-- Washington is doing a shameful, repugnant job of honoring our veterans when they come home: be it underfunding the VA or not supporting expanded educational and training opportunities. That makes me damned mad-- and I won't accept it once I'm in the Senate. The people of this State and this nation deserve so much better.

The role of blogs and the reaction of average NC citizens to his candidacy:
The blogosphere and social networking sites are changing the face of the political process. They providce a voice and power to those often ignored b/c they didn't have the big $ to get the attention of politicians. They are the future.

Average people have been incredible-- (whatever "average" means :-) )-- I've received tons of letters and encouragement from people all across this state. They want change.

What North Carolinians are looking for in a Senator:
North Carolinians-- like the rest of the USA-- are fed up with professional [politicians. They are disillusioned-- the approval ratings for the Dem Party is below that of the President. They want leaders who offer real solutions to the war, economic security and rising health care costs.

Some Washington insiders think I should get out of the race-- but my opponents don't have the advantage I do of genuine outsider status. I'm not a politician and I'm proud of that. It's my strong suit-- but it makes me more dependent on the financial support of people just like all of you-- be it big or small dollars.

I've had to balance and draw up budgets for small and big businesses. I've worked in the private sector and not inside a political bubble. We have to spend within our means-- and this Administration and its political enablers like Mrs. Dole in the Congress don't have a clue as to how to do that.

On Don't Ask, Don't Tell:
I oppose and have always opposed "don't ask don't tell." It's ludicrous. The young servicemen and servicewomen with whom I have spoken have had one consistent response: "I don't care who serves so long as they've got my back."

On marriage equality:
If a church wants to marry people they can; if they don't they don't have to do so. I oppose all forms of discrimination-- institutional or otherwise-- by the government.

On whether homosexuality as a political wedge is losing its edge:
t has been in the past. I'm not running to lose-- and as I've said before I have faith in the good people of this State to not be fooled by non-issues such as whether a candidate is a man or a woman, gay or straight, black or white, blonde-headed or red-headed. So-- get involved and prove the fearmongerers wrong.

His view of the Senate's role in the confirmation process of Supreme Court justices, as it's likely that there will be Supreme Court retirements and the court may rule on marriage equality as cases making their way there:
Members of the Senate-- and mind you that CJ Roberts and Justice Alito were confirmed by the GOP majority at the time-- have done an abysmal job in vetting judicial candidates. We are appointing activist judges---not prudent and thoughtful jurists.

On the role of the DSCC in the primary, which worked hard with local pols to recruit a primary challenger to run against Neal after he disclosed his sexual orientation. He had been the sole candidate up until that point.
The DSCC doesn't vote in North Carolina. We have elections and primaries and not coronations. That's why it's critical to raise the funds to compete in a statewide race. I don't expect all the big DSCC supporters to write $2,300 checks but I hope you and others will help grow this movement by involving your friends, family, neighbors and coworkers.

You can read more of Jim's answers over at the Blend.

***

In a race that may take $15 million to win (and the GOP is going to pour money in to save Liddy's posterior), Neal needs support not only from North Carolinians -- this is a race that will garner national attention. Jim's shooting for 1,000 donations and 1,000 new members to his Facebook page in the next 10 days.

-- Jim Neal's official campaign web site.
-- Jim Neal's ActBlue contribution page.
-- Jim Neal for Senate Facebook group.

The archive of Pam's House Blend Jim Neal posts is here.


Know a blog that deserves to be featured on the Blog World Report?  Contact Robert.

Sorry, but you need flash to view this video


Bob Allen Goes to the Pokey ...
From Tengrain for Mock, Paper, Scissors

elephant_sex.jpg

Seconds after he was convicted Friday of soliciting a sex act in a park bathroom, legislative leaders were discussing how to remove him from office.

My favorite sentence from the article:

Because of the nature of the crime, prosecutors said, Allen would have to undergo testing for sexually transmitted diseases. The results, they said, would be made public.

Hard Times for Republicans?
From Snave for Various Ecstasies

Many of us are wondering which Senate and House seats are up for grabs. We may also be wondering in which races the left may have an advantage. These links may provide us with some ideas.
The 10 most competitive Senate races:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21379028/

Hard times for Republicans in Congress:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21333198/

As low as the public approval rating may be for Congress, these articles give me some hope that the left may be able to pick up a few seats in the Senate. It seems like it may also be difficult not to pick up some seats in the House.

"Only" 434 days to go!
And don't forget this is Veterans' Day! Thanks to the veterans who have helped give us America and who have helped to preserve our great nation throughout our history!

What about the other stuff?
From Pissed Off Patricia for Morning Martini

We’ve all heard about the recall of tainted and toxic toys made in China. I want to ask some questions about this problem. Is anyone checking things like pet toys that are made in China? How about things made in China that are used by adults?

I’m talking about things that might be found in our kitchens, bathrooms or anywhere in our homes. For example, are we eating from plastic utensils or plates made over there? What’s in those products and are they safe?

Nixing Nick News
From Wordsmith for Les Enragés.org

The thing with catching snippets of a 'story' on one of the cable news channels for me is thinking it's actually a story.

CNN had a bit on the show Linda Ellerbee 'anchors' on Nickelodeon, 'Nick News' - specifically one show recently that highlighted some kids with consciences, and the actions they were taking in their community. Using the magic of "The Google" I found that the paucity of websites and/or blogs railing on about all of this were the wingnut lunatics on their precarious fringe.

Kevin Hayden at 'The American Street' had the goods earlier this month; he also has the links to those wingnut lunatics on their precarious fringe. I absolutely refuse to link to them. Fuck 'em. It's not enough that they practically rule the airwaves with their bullshit anyway. Anything with depth, anything requiring cognitive skills, anything that deviates from their fear-riddled 'the terrorists are on the outskirts of town' bullshit, they just cannot tolerate.

As one young woman says, 'kids younger than me shouldn't be making my clothes.'

Watch it - the entire video is 21 minutes and features several kids. It is indeed inspiring.

Rebels With a Cause

Turns out that there may be something real about the 'Da Vinci Code.'
From Eli Blake for Deep Thought

In the book and the movie "The Da Vinci Code," a secret code is hidden within paintings created by the Renaissance master which hold the keys to deadly secrets that are protected by a fanatical secret society.

There may be no such deep and dark secret at work here, but an Italian musician named Giovanni Maria Pala appears to have uncovered a musical code within one of Da Vinci's most famous paintings, "The Last Supper" (pictured above). The painting depicts the last Passover meal shared by Christ and the twelve disciples before his betrayal by Judas Iscariot, one of the twelve.

Pala discovered that if he put five parallel lines in the mode of a musical staff across the picture and looked at the positions of the hands of the people in the picure and the bread on the table, and replaced them with musical notes, they fit exactly into the scale. When he tried to play it, it did not make any sense, until he remembered that Da Vinci, a lefthander, wrote sometimes from right to left instead of left to right. When he read it backwards, the music formed a tune remiscent of requiems played at the time. In other words, Da Vinci, if he put it in there on purpose, must have figured that someday someone would figure out the code, and play the music with the picture.

It is perhaps most amazing that after waiting for four hundred years to be discovered, this would be discovered within a couple of years after a movie came out speculating on the possibility of Da Vinci hiding clues in his paintings.

Sometimes reality does mirror fiction, more than we think.

*...At The Iowa Jefferson-Jackson Dinner
From Cliff Schecter

Cliff Schecter posted the following videos from the Iowa Jefferson-Jackson Dinner

*Barack Obama

*Bill Richardson

*John Edwards

*Hillary Clinton

The Marlboro Marine Revisited
From Carol for Peace

A story worth telling.

From the L.A. Times

To watch a narrated slide-show, click here (It's worth watching, if you have the time).
The MARLBORO MARINE
Two lives blurred together by a photo

Times photographer Luis Sinco made James Blake Miller an emblem of the war. The image would change both of their lives and connect them in ways neither imagined.

By Luis Sinco
Times Staff Photographer

November 11, 2007

The young Marine lighted a cigarette and let it dangle. White smoke wafted around his helmet. His face was smeared with war paint. Blood trickled from his right ear and the bridge of his nose.

Momentarily deafened by cannon blasts, he didn't know the shooting had stopped. He stared at the sunrise. His expression caught my eye. To me, it said: terrified, exhausted and glad just to be alive. I recognized that look because that's I how felt too.

I raised my camera and snapped a few shots.

With the click of a shutter, Marine Lance Cpl. James Blake Miller, a country boy from Kentucky, became an emblem of the war in Iraq. The resulting image would change two lives -- his and mine.

I was embedded with Charlie Company of the 1st Battalion, 8th Marine Regiment, as it entered Fallouja, an insurgent stronghold in Iraq's Sunni Triangle, on Nov. 8, 2004. We encountered heavy fire almost immediately. We were pinned down all night at a traffic circle, where a 6-inch curb offered the only protection.

I hunkered down in the gutter that endless night, praying for daylight, trying hard to make myself small. A cold rain came down. I cursed the Marines' illumination flares that wafted slowly earthward, making us wait an eternity for darkness to return.

At dawn, the gunfire and explosions subsided. A white phosphorous artillery round burst overhead, showering blazing-hot tendrils. We came across three insurgents lying in the street, two of them dead, their blood mixing with rainwater.

The third, a wiry Arab youth, tried to mouth a few words. All I could think was: "Buddy, you're already dead."

We rounded a corner and again came under heavy fire, forcing us to scramble for cover. I ran behind a Marine as we crossed the street, the bullets ricocheting at our feet.

Gunfire poured down, and it seemed incredible that no one was hit. A pair of tanks rumbled down the road to shield us. The Marines kicked open the door of a house, and we all piled in.

Miller and other Marines took positions on the rooftop; I set up my satellite phone to transmit photos. But as I worked downstairs in the kitchen, a deep rumble almost blew the room apart.

Two cannon rounds had slammed into a nearby house. Miller, the platoon's radioman, had called in the tanks, pinpointed the targets and shouted "Fire!"

I ran to the roof and saw smoldering ruins across a large vacant lot. Beneath a heap of bricks, men lay dead or dying. I sat down and collected my wits. Miller propped himself against a wall and lighted his cigarette. I transmitted the picture that night. Power in Fallouja had been cut in advance of the assault, forcing me to be judicious with my batteries. I considered not even sending Miller's picture, thinking my editors would prefer images of fierce combat.

The photo of Miller was the last of 11 that I sent that day.

On the second day of the battle, I called my wife by satellite phone to tell her I was OK. She told me my photo had ended up on the front page of more than 150 newspapers. Dan Rather had gushed over it on the evening news. Friends and family had called her to say they had seen the photo -- my photo.

Soon, my editors called and asked me to find the "Marlboro Marine" for a follow-up story. Who was this brave young hero? Women wanted to marry him. Mothers wanted to know whether he was their son.

I didn't even know his name. Shell-shocked and exhausted, I had simply identified Miller as "A Marine" and clicked "send."

I found Miller four days later in an auditorium after a dangerous dash across an open parade ground in the city's civic center. Miller's unit was taking a break, eating military rations.

Clean-shaven and without war paint, Miller, 20, looked much younger than the battle-stressed warrior in the picture -- young enough to be my son.

He was cooperative, but he was embarrassed about the photo's impact back home.

Once our story identified him, the national fascination grew stronger. People shipped care packages, making sure Miller had more than enough smokes. President Bush sent cigars, candy and memorabilia from the White House.

Then Maj. Gen. Richard F. Natonski, head of the 1st Marine Division, made a special trip to see the Marlboro Marine.

I was in the forward command center, which by then featured a large blowup of the photo. "You might want to see this," an officer said, nudging me to follow.

To talk to Miller, Natonski had to weave between earthen berms, run through bombed-out buildings and make a mad sprint across a wide street to avoid sniper fire before diving into a shattered storefront.

"Miller, get your ass up here," a first sergeant barked on the radio.

Miller had no idea what was going on as he ran through the rubble. He snapped to attention when he saw the general.

Natonski shook Miller's hand. Americans had "connected" with his photo, the general said, and nobody wanted to see him wounded or dead.

"We can have you home tomorrow," he said.

Miller hesitated, then shook his head. He did not want to leave his buddies behind. "It just wasn't right," he told me later.

The tall, lanky general towered over the grunt. "Your father raised one hell of a young man," he said, looking Miller in the eye. They said goodbye, and Natonski scrambled back to the command post.

For his loyalty, Miller was rewarded with horror. The assault on Fallouja raged on, leaving nearly 100 Americans dead and 450 wounded. The bodies of some 1,200 insurgents littered the streets.

As the fighting dragged on for a month, the story fell off the front page. I joined the exodus of journalists heading home or moving to the next story.

More than a year and a half would pass before I saw Miller again.

Back home, I immersed myself in other assignments, trying to put Fallouja behind me. Yet not a day went by that I didn't think about Miller and what we experienced in Iraq.

National Public Radio interviewed me. Much to my embarrassment, the Los Angeles City Council adopted a resolution in my honor. I became a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize. Bloggers riffed on the photo's meaning. Requests for prints kept coming.

In January 2006, I was on assignment along the U.S.-Mexico border when my wife called. "Your boy is on TV. He has PTSD," she said. "They kicked him out of the Marines."

I'd spoken with Miller by phone twice, but the conversations were short and superficial. I knew post-traumatic stress disorder was a complicated diagnosis. So once again, I dug up his number. Again, I offered simple words: Life is sweet. We survived. Everything else is gravy.

As the third anniversary of the U.S.-led invasion approached, my editors wanted another follow-up story.

So in spring 2006, I traveled to Miller's hometown of Jonancy, Ky., in the hollows of Appalachia. I drove east from Lexington along Interstate 64, part of the nationwide Purple Heart Trail honoring dead and wounded veterans, before turning south.

Mobile homes and battered cars dot the rugged ranges. Marijuana is a major cash crop. Addiction to methamphetamine and prescription drugs is rampant.

Kids marry young, and boys go to work mining the black seams of coal. Heavy trucks rumble day and night.

Miller showed me around. At an abandoned mine, he walked carefully around a large, shallow pool of standing water that mirrored the green wilderness and springtime sky. He picked up a chunk of coal.

"Around here, this is what it's all about," he said. "Nothing else.

"It was this or the Marines."

Often brooding and sullen, Miller joked about being "21 going on 70," the result, he said, of humping heavy armor and gear on a 6-foot, 160-pound frame.

Before he was allowed to leave Iraq, he attended a mandatory "warrior transitioning" session about PTSD and adjusting to home life.

Each Marine received a questionnaire. Were they sleeping all right? Did they have thoughts of suicide? Did they feel guilt about their actions?

Everybody knew the drill. Answer yes and be evaluated further. Say no and go home.

Miller said he didn't want to miss his flight. He answered no to every question.

He returned to Camp Lejeune, N.C. His high school sweetheart, Jessica Holbrooks, joined him there, and they were married in a civil ceremony.

Then came the nightmares and hallucinations. He imagined shadowy figures outside the windows. Faces of the dead haunted his sleep.

Once, while cleaning a shotgun, he blacked out. He regained consciousness when Jessica screamed out his name. Snapping back to reality, he realized he was pointing the gun at her.

He reported the problems to superiors, who promised to get him help.

Then came a single violent episode, which put an end to his days as a Marine.

It happened in the storm-tossed Gulf of Mexico in September 2005. His unit had been sent to New Orleans to assist with Hurricane Katrina relief efforts. Now a second giant storm, Hurricane Rita, was moving in, and the Marines were ordered to seek safety out at sea.

In the claustrophobic innards of a rolling Navy ship, someone whistled. The sound reminded Miller of a rocket-propelled grenade. He attacked the sailor who had whistled. He came to in the boat's brig. He was medically discharged with a "personality disorder" on Nov. 10, 2005 -- exactly one year after his picture made worldwide news.

Back home in Kentucky, the Millers settled into a sparsely furnished second-story apartment. Four small windows afforded little daylight. The TV was always on.

Miller bought a motorcycle and went for long rides. He and Jessica drank all night and slept all day. He started collecting a monthly disability benefit of about $2,500. The couple spent hours watching movies on DVD, Coronas and bourbon cocktails in hand. Friends and family gave them space.

Miller had hoped to pursue a career in law enforcement. But the PTSD and abrupt discharge killed that dream. No one would trust him with a weapon.

But at least he didn't have to go back to Iraq. He started to realize he wasn't the only one traumatized by war.

"There's a word for it around here," Jessica said. "It's called 'vets.' " She talked of Miller's grandfather, forever changed by the Korean War and dead by age 35. Her Uncle Hargis, a Vietnam veteran, had it too. He experienced mood swings for years.

Sometimes, Miller's stories about Iraq unnerved his young bride. He sensed it and talked less. Nobody really understands, he said, unless they've been there.

On June 3, 2006, the Millers renewed their vows at a hilltop clubhouse overlooking the forests and strip mines. It was a lavish ceremony paid for by donors from across the country who had read about Miller's travails or seen him on television. Local businesses pitched in as well.

His father and two younger brothers were supposed to be groomsmen but didn't show up. His estranged mother wasn't invited.

Miller looked sharp in his Marine Corps dress uniform of dark-blue cloth and red piping. Jessica was lovely in white, her long hair gathered high.

Instead of a honeymoon, the young couple traveled to Washington, D.C., at the invitation of the National Mental Health Assn. The group wanted to honor Miller for his courage in going public about his PTSD. Its leaders also wanted him to visit key lawmakers to share his experience.

As a boy, Miller confided, he had embraced religion, even going so far as to become an ordained minister by mail order. He knew the Bible verses, felt the passion for preaching.

That's how he found his new mission: to tell people what it was like to come home from war with a broken mind.

Three days after their wedding, I tagged along as the young couple flew to the nation's capital. Easily distracted by the offer of free drinks for an all-American hero, Miller stayed out until 3 a.m. He was hung over when he met with House members a few hours later.

Miller chatted up GOP Rep. Harold Rogers, the congressman from his district. He smoked and frequently cursed while recounting his combat experiences. I cringed but stayed on the sidelines, snapping photos.

Miller shuffled from one congressional office to the next, passing displays filled with photos of Marines killed in Iraq. As he told his story over and again, the politicians listened politely and thanked Miller for his service. One congressman sent an aide to tell Miller he was too busy to meet. No one promised to take up his cause.

After Miller picked up his award, he took a whirlwind tour past the White House and Lincoln Memorial, but his mind was elsewhere. At a bar the night before, free booze had flowed in honor of the Marlboro Marine. Miller wanted more.

"Let's get drunk," he said.

I returned to Los Angeles the next morning, thinking I would catch up with Miller in a couple of months.

A week later, Jessica called. After they got home, Miller's mood had become volatile. He was OK one minute and in a deep funk the next, she told me. Then he'd disappeared. She hadn't seen him for days.

Could I come to Kentucky and help?

Why me? I thought. I am not Miller's brother. Or his father. I could feel the line between journalist and subject blurring. Was I covering the story or becoming part of it?

I traveled all night to get to Pikeville, Ky., and soon found myself with Jessica, making the rounds of all the places Miller might have gone. I wanted to be somewhere else -- anywhere else.

Finally, the next morning, Jessica saw her husband driving in the opposite direction. She did a U-turn, hit the gas and caught up with him down the road.

He got out of his truck. A woman sat in the passenger seat.

"Who is that, Blake?" Jessica demanded. "Who is she?"

He said her name was Sherry. They had just met, and he was helping her move. Jessica didn't believe him.

I thought: Didn't I attend this young couple's fairy tale wedding just 10 days ago? Now, here they were, in a gas station parking lot, creating a spectacle.

Jessica grilled Miller. He bobbed and weaved. He appeared sober and sullen. Then he dropped a bomb. He didn't want her anymore and had filed for divorce.

"You guys might want to go home and talk," I suggested.

There, the tortured dialogue escalated.

Jessica pleaded with Blake to stop and think. They could quit drinking, she said. They'd get help for him and as a couple. Maybe they could move away -- anything to work it out.

Miller slumped on the couch. I sensed his unease and feared he would become violent, so I stayed for a while even though I felt intrusive. But Miller remained strangely calm, albeit brooding and distant.

I returned the next morning. He called his attorney and put the phone on speaker. If uncontested, the lawyer said, the divorce would become final in 60 days. Jessica went to the fire escape to gather herself.

Miller remained unmoved, chain-smoking. The local newspaper had been calling him about rumors that he was getting divorced. It was a major local story. Finally, he wrote a statement. He asked for compassion and respect for their privacy.

The next day, I found Miller in a back bedroom at his uncle's house. He told me that he had come close to committing suicide the night before, when he thought about driving his motorcycle off the edge of a mountain road.

He showed me the morning newspaper. His divorce was the lead story.

I felt torn. I didn't want to get involved. I desperately wanted to close the book on Iraq. But if I hadn't taken Miller's picture, this very personal drama wouldn't be front-page news. I felt responsible.

Sometimes, when things get hard to witness, I use my camera as a shield. It creates a space for me to work -- and distance to keep my eyes open and my feelings in check. But Miller had no use for a photojournalist. He needed a helping hand.

I flashed back to the chaos of combat in Fallouja. In the rattle and thunder, brick walls separated me from the world coming to an end. In the tight spaces, we were scared mindless. Everybody dragged deeply on cigarettes.

Above the din, I heard what everybody was thinking: This is the end.

I've never felt so completely alone.

I snapped back to the present, and before I knew it, the words spilled out.

"I have to ask you something, Blake," I said. "If I'd gone down in Fallouja, would you have carried me out?"

"Damn straight," he said, without hesitation.

"OK then," I said. "I think you're wounded pretty badly. I want to help you."

He looked at me for a moment. "All right," he said.

(Thank you to Walt on the Camp Casey list for the heads-up on this article.)

A Pittance of Time
From Mary Ellen for The Divine Democrat

Yesterday was Veteran's Day, and noted on many of our blogs our soldiers who are fighting valiantly in Iraq and Afghanistan are being pushed aside by our President. Oh, he uses them for photo-ops and to continue his dirty war for the benefit of his corporate friends, but when it comes down to it, he has left them behind.

As pointed out in an excellent post at Politics Plus yesterday, The GOP is planning to cut $15 billion from the veteran programs over the next 10 years. The soldiers and sailors that are currently in harms way in the the Middle East, are about to have their future veterans' benefits and health care slashed. If, that is, the Republicans get their way.

So, we ask ourselves "What can we do?" Besides voting these bums out, there is something that will make a difference right now. You may not know how to send support, but I found a website that may help you if you have no idea what to send or how to send it. It's called "Any Soldier". Here is an excerpt from their website:

HOW IT WORKS

We have Soldier contacts on the "Where to Send" page. Click through the names and select the one(s) you wish to support. They list what the folks they represent want and need. We even have a search capability so you can easily identify what the troops need most.

All the Soldiers involved in this effort are military volunteers stationed in areas that are in harm's way. You send your support (letters and/or packages) addressed to them and when they see the "Attn: Any Soldier" line in their address they put your letters and packages into the hands of Soldiers who don't get much or any mail first. Everything is shared.

We have "What to Send", "How to Send" and "FAQ" pages to help you properly send letters and packages, please read these. Be sure to also read our "New & Stuff" and "Success Stories" pages. This effort is 110% voluntary. You send your support, and maybe some stuff, directly to whatever unit or units you want, you don't send us anything.
Time is getting short if you want to do something special for "any soldier" for Christmas. This site is great and gives plenty of advice on shipping packages, such as; Do NOT, for any reason, or in ANY amount, include food items in a care package with ANY hygiene items or chemicals of any type.

If you want to send a care package, make it only food items or only non-food items. You would not believe how even factory sealed cookies taste when they have lived together in the same package with bath soap for a month in 120 degree heat. Also, since so many folks simply won't repack liquid items in vacuum bags (like FoodsaverTM for example), please just use another box. We get requests all the time that folks NOT send soaps, bug repellent, dryer sheets, air fresheners, detergents, deoderants, (getting the idea?) in the same box as food items.
Trust me, a good smelling arm pit is a nice thing, but a cookie that tasts like one will not improve a Soldier's morale...

They also provide packages that are already made up for you and they will ship them out. This is great for those who don't have time to do it themselves.

For those of you who can sew, this is a great idea, neckerchief has a summer secret: a filling of water-absorbing polymer granules from the garden center. Soaked in water, the cool tie's polymer granules absorb more than 200% their weight in water. Tied around the neck or worn as a headband, a cool tie provides all-day cool relief through evaporation.

The cool tie is simple to sew, requiring only a straight-stitch sewing machine. It's lightweight and unbreakable--perfect for gifts or to include in care packages for our troops. Instructions on how to make this is in the website.

They also tell you that you don't need to ship out packages, a card or letter mean just as much to these soldiers. If you include your e-mail address, the soldier may have time to drop you a line. They aren't required to do so, however. Obviously, they're pretty busy and may not have time.

My husband and I talked about this website last night and we are going to get started on it right away. My teen aged son is also enthusiastic about doing something on his own. What a great way to support our troops, so much better than a yellow "support the troops" magnet, eh?

The ArcLight & Landmark theaters: Cinephile paradise or giant ripoff?
From By Ken Levine

Don’t know about where you live but here in El-Lay we now have state-of-the-art movie complexes. Reserved seating, plush leather seats, designer concessions, all kinds of amenities to make you forget you’re paying more than top dollar to see LIONS FOR LAMBS. Giant screens, stereo sound, THX. Everything a theatergoer could possibly want other than a rewrite. And before and after the film there are cafes, bars, a gift shop (LIONS FOR LAMBS action figures?), and even concierges. (“Excuse me, could you tell where I might rent a car during the show?”)

You’re not going to a movie, you’re having a complete “cinematic experience”.

The first one of these multi-screen modern movie palaces locally was the ArcLight in Hollywood. I’ve only been there once but it was quite lovely. Parking was confusing and expensive and getting to Hollywood is always an ordeal (and all the while you’re thinking to yourself “I must be passing six other theaters showing the same damn movie”) but the ArcLight doesn’t show commercials so it’s almost worth it.

However they do charge a pretty penny. From what I understand, beginning in December tickets will be $16. That’s right. One-six. For movies that will be on American Airlines in two months.

Slightly less expensive is the new challenger, the Landmark on the Westside. My wife and I went to see BEFORE THE DEVIL KNOWS YOU’RE DEAD there this weekend and this was our experience.

Free parking in a well-lit structure underneath. So far so good.

Buying tickets is like checking into the Bellagio. A long counter manned by three high school honor students. And a long snaking line that moves like molasses because each person takes five minutes to process. You have to select your movie, the time, pick out your seat from the seating chart. If there’s an older couple that’s an hour right there. (“What about here?” “No, too close.” “What about here?” “Feh!” “Can we just go in and decide and then come back?”)

And then the credit card transaction, and God forbid someone has a pass and needs to fill out a form. Next time I order online, even if that takes ten minutes and by mistake I’ve rented a condo in Hilton Head.

Matinee tickets: $11. Not terrible when you consider how much money we drop at Starbucks.

There are many cheery ushers, ticket takers, and concession clerks in smart uniforms. It’s like the UP WITH PEOPLE group all got daytime jobs. The candy counter features tony yogurt, mushroom on wheat pizzas, kosher hot dogs, Japanese biscuit sticks, Australian chocolate biscuits, pretzel sticks with choice of raspberry wasabi, apricot ginger, or champagne garlic gourmet mustard. I had popcorn and a drink. $9.

There’s mood lighting in the restroom – why, I don’t know. Do randy couples slip out of movies and scamper to the bathrooms to join the “Ten Feet Above Sea Level Club”?

Skipped the bar and lounge, which seemed more suited to LAX than a multiplex.

Most of the theaters have stadium seating. You better sit in one of the top rows because the lower rows are underneath the screen. From the first row you can almost kick the screen. They’d have to sell Japanese biscuits laced with marijuana for me to sit in one of those seats.

And then there are the “living room seating” theaters. Leather loveseats instead of chairs. Lucky us, we had drawn one of those. But they’re not just loveseats for two. There are also loveseats for three. That’s what we got assigned to. Debby, and me…and some fat guy. We complained to our usher, (Kenneth from 30 ROCK) and after much hand wringing he moved us to a couch for two.

Kenneth told us the idea for this living room arrangement was (a) to cater to the young date night crowd (who goes out on dates of three?) and (b) to simulate your living room experience. This I don’t get. Why would I want to pay big bucks to approximate sitting in my own house watching a DVD I can rent for pennies? And I never have to move over to give the fat guy room.

The previews began and you couldn’t hear them. Someone complained and the volume was raised to the threshold of pain. After the previews the lights went down, the feature began, two seconds later the lights went back on and you could hardly see the screen. And to make matters worse, it was a sex scene. A naked Marissa Tomei and I couldn’t see shit! Movie night at camp had more reliable equipment than this! The screen went blank. The lights went down, the picture came back, the sound was too low and had to be adjusted, and finally, after Marissa had put her top back on, we were able to watch the movie.

I live in a town of luxury boxes, stadium clubs, VIP sections, exclusive clubs. Everyone has to be special, privileged, “on the list”. And they’re willing to way overpay to get it. I go to a movie theater to see a movie, not to hoist a few, not to Christmas shop, not to sample the great biscuits of the world.

I can’t imagine a movie coming out that I would be willing to spend $16 to see. Unless Marissa Tomei was in the loveseat with me. Of course, my wife would want to be there too. Hey, maybe couches for three isn’t such a bad idea.

Locally led nascent peace on earth and good presigned contracts to white men
From Grace Nearing for Scriptoids

A year and a half into the Iraq occupation, the U.S. State Department launched a new branch: the Office of Reconstruction and Stabilization. On any given day, it is paying private contractors to draw up detailed plans to reconstruct twenty-five different countries that may, for one reason or another, find themselves the target of U.S.-sponsored destruction, from Venezuela to Iran. Corporations and consultants are lined up on “presigned contracts” so that they are ready to leap into action as soon as disaster strikes. -- Naomi Klein, The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism
It’s true, it’s true. Just wade through all the mil.gov.state.tweakspeak -- including the cringe-worthy “locally led nascent peace” -- on the Office of Reconstruction and Stabilization website and then gasp your way through the FAQs and the Essential Tasks Matrix.
The Core Mission of S/CRS [Office of Reconstruction and Stabilization] is to lead, coordinate and institutionalize U.S. Government civilian capacity to prevent or prepare for post-conflict situations, and to help stabilize and reconstruct societies in transition from conflict or civil strife, so they can reach a sustainable path toward peace, democracy and a market economy. [emph added]
Well that certainly sums it up. If your country or region has nationalized natural resources or other stuff that we want, the US Department of Regime Change has added you to its wish list of prime candidates. Norway -- you’ve been served.
Q: Why has S/CRS developed a planning framework?

The Presidential Directive for reconstruction and stabilization gives a very explicit mandate for planning. Specifically, it instructs and empowers the Secretary of State to coordinate an interagency process to: (1) identify states at risk of instability having stuff we want and lead interagency planning to prevent or mitigate grab the stuff we want and promote regime change and endless conflict; and (2) develop plans for integrated U.$. re$pon$e$ on recon$truction and $tabilization effort$. [editorial liberties taken]
It’s absolutely soul chilling. They’ve got the tool kits (their term), the metrics (their term), and the Essential Tasks Matrix (their term) all set to go, along with shrink-wrapped bricks of $100 bills.

And what really inspires total confidence is that everything is so cobbled together and riddled with typos and don’t-give-a-shit mangled syntax that you just know some rat-fucking ex-member of the College Republican National Committee got paid $250,000 to “create” the package. The Office of Reconstruction and Stability is going to take over and smoothly run most of the world on the basis of approximately 500 to 600 PowerPoint slides electronically cut and pasted together -- give or take a few weapons of mass destruction.

Well something had to be done. The technology, housing, and finance bubbles have burst and splattered, so total morbid vertical integration -- destruction, maiming, killing, reconstruction, healthcare, burial-cremation, destruction, maiming, killing, reconstruction, healthcare, burial-cremation -- is not only the next big thing it’s the only big thing left.

Time for a little trash talkin'
From Pookyshoehorn for Ramblings of a Madwoman

No, this isn't a post about Campaign 2008. It's a post about, well, trash.

Saturday afternoon I was driving home from visiting my parents and listening to NPR. It's a little confusing to do that right now, because the local DC NPR station now has several channels in HD radio, and it seems that most of my favorite shows are on those channels. Hence, I started listening to a show I don't normally listen to, “Marketplace.”

This is how I found out about “Tess' Trash Challenge.” Basically, the challenge is to take responsibility for your trash for a week. As in, instead of throwing it in a trash can, you have to carry it around with you wherever you go. From the story:

For the most part, I've been able to recycle or compost most of my waste this week. We should have had a scale today, but I don't think there's one in the office. I can definitely say that I did not generate six pounds per day -- which is the national average. That would be 35 pounds or so to carry around and I'd be developing some nice guns.

I'm finding that the bulk of my "tossage" is happening at work. Our building's recycling program only allows office paper, glass bottles and aluminum cans. That's it. Quite frustrating. For example, that Starbucks cup that holds my grande extra-hot nonfat latte? Goes in the recycling bin at home. Goes in the garbage at work.
I'm not sure I'm ready to sign up for the challenge, but it certainly got me thinking. Even just visualizing carrying around my trash for a week is enough to make me stop and think when I'm about to throw something in the can. We switched over to cloth napkins a while ago, so we're good there, but we do occasionally use paper towels. And we're very good about recycling bottles and cans and paper, but what about all that extra packaging? You know, the little sheet of plastic from the box of tea? And, of course, there's the food scraps. We've tried composting, and maybe we will try again this spring. But living in the city makes it a very demanding practice, as our many little rodent friends would love to get at some corn cobs.

If you're interested, try out the challenge yourself (at the very least, try to imagine it, as I have). You can read more at Tess' Trash Challenge.

Rules of the Trash Challenge:

  • No kitty or doggie poo (it's a health risk)
  • No carrying into restaurants or malls where I could get kicked out
  • Really smelly stuff goes inside extra Ziplocs
  • If it's recyclable, you don't have to carry it around
  • Trash from work is included, as is trash from the rest of your household (i.e. if your honey tosses it at home, it goes with you...)

Obama Bashing Increases As He Threatens To Win
From Ron Chusid for Liberal Values

The Obama-hype of last winter is being replaced this week by Obama-bashing as supporters of other candidates see the race tightening and face the prospect that Obama is now in a strong position to win the nomination. Taylor Marsh provides one example of the common attacks at Huffington Post. Much of her attack can be summarized by saying that Obama is not following the lead of the liberal netroots on all matters. As I noted in a post on a different matter yesterday there are increasingly sets of positions held by the bulk of both the left and right blogospheres. These rigid sets of positions, however, are not shared by many voters and Obama’s heresy is seen as a strength by many of his supporters. This especially includes independents and the new Democratic voters who gave the party their victory in 2006.

Marsh also takes selected quotes from Obama to demonstrate that, when he’s at his worst, Obama can sound as triangulating as Clinton. Tell me something I didn’t know. I’ve often been frustrated that Obama can be overly vague, as is the case with all politicians. It is not always possible to be certain if Obama is truly different from other politicians or if he is skilled in giving that impression. The difference is that, while in his worst statements he sounds no better than politicians like Hillary Clinton, at his best he greatly surpasses her, as he did most recently at the Jefferson Jackson Dinner. Besides, Marsh is hardly helping Clinton by stressing triangulation as a fault.

Much of the criticism of Obama is centered around bringing up Social Security. I find the attacks from the left that Obama shouldn’t say there is a problem with Social Security to be quite similar to the claims of the right that there is no problem with health care. Certainly the problems with health care are more severe, and conservatives sometimes might exaggerate the problems faced by Social Security, but that does not mean that there are no problems at all. Similarly the warnings of privatization sound quite a bit like the right’s use of scare tactics about “socialized medicine” to attack every serious health care proposal. Placing a small percentage of Social Security into the stock market might not have been a good plan, but it is an exaggeration to call it privatization.

The real problem with Bush’s plan was not that use of the stock market is inherently evil but that this would take away funds which are used to pay benefits to current beneficiaries, exacerbating rather than helping the current problems. I’ve seen some liberal bloggers even respond to Bush’s proposal by criticizing the entire idea of investing in the stock market. This is also an unsound financial belief, but it would be best to encourage such investments through tax breaks and tax deductible investment plans as opposed to through Social Security.

It is also strange that Clinton supporters would attack Obama on Social Security as they are both saying very similar things. Both have discussed increasing the cap on income which is taxed, possibly with a donut hole so that only wealthier taxpayers would pay more. They are both taking a risk with this approach. Increasing the cap could undermine political support for Social Security in the long run. Social Security only considers a portion of income in determining benefits and therefore places a cap on income which is taxable to match this. If the system is changed and someone making $200,000 had to pay Social Security taxes on their entire income, but benefits continue to be limited as if they were making around $100,000, Social Security would not seem to be a very good deal to those making well over $100,000. The program would increasingly become a welfare program as opposed to a retirement and disability benefits program which all share in. It is the feeling that Social Security is a shared program and not a welfare program which has limited political challenges to the program. If taxes are increased while income upon which benefits are based remains capped affluent voters will have decreased motivation to accept the program, making Republican schemes to go even further in privatizing Social Security sound more favorable.

While I was disappointed in Obama for only considering raising the cap on Social Security as a solution, I am also apprehensive in trusting Hillary Clinton on this issue. Besides also considering a similar increase in the cap, she has proposed having a commission evaluate the problem after the election. The last time Hillary Clinton approached a problem in this manner (on health care) it was a disaster.



BLOG RECOMMENDATION

I've been to this site several times and it never fails to put a smile on my face.  WARNING:  If you're a severe diabetic be careful, this place is too sweet.  Check out Cute Overload! :)


puzzle me this...
From Angela Cartwright for
Said & Done

Somerset Memories has a Call to Creativity Challenge based on my mini self portrait (above) that appeared in the August/September issue of the magazine.

Here's the challenge below...I hope you'll submit your self portraits and maybe get published!

Mini-Mosaic Self-Portrait Puzzles
In August/September 2007 issue Somerset Memories (page 44), artist Angela Cartwright showed us that self portraits can be very revealing. Trying to express who you were and who you’ve become can be a fun and exposing challenge.

What can you come up with when you combine the “young you” and the“adult you?” Using a tiny canvas and photographs of yourself at different ages, along with your unique creativity, we invite you to show your own personal mini self-portrait puzzles.

To be considered for publication in Somerset Memories, clearly label your artwork and attach it to your artwork. and submit your mini self-portraits to:

Somerset Memories, Mini Self Portraits
22992 Mill Creek, Suite B
Laguna Hills , CA 92653

Include brief instructions, materials used and a few sentences about your inspiration, feelings or thoughts about your piece. Results will be published in the June/July 2008 issue.
Deadline for artwork to be received: January 11, 2008.

What a day, look it in the face...
From Randal Graves for L'ennui mélodieux

...and hold your vomit.

Voters asked Congress "to focus on withdrawing our troops from Iraq, on expanding healthcare access. ... They did not ask us to spend any time on the impeachment of the vice president," Wasserman Schultz insisted.
Then it's a good thing our troops are being withdrawn and healthcare access has been expanded so you don't have to waste your precious time with the silly frivolities of us moonbats, perpetually uninformed as we lounge about in a haze of marijuana smoke, discarded clothing and empty potato chip bags strewn at our feet.
"That is all the media would focus on. ... And to what end?" she asked, arguing that Bush was the real problem and removing Cheney wouldn't make a significant difference with only a year until the next election.
Of course. The guy publicly implementing the policies is the real problem, certainly not the actual source of the policies. If it wasn't for Agent 41, Babs and Saudi cash bailing his ass out at every turn, this fuck would be pumping gas or have been a drug casualty in a morgue. [Being a wishy-washy lefty, I humbly apologize to the gas pumpers and those who indulge in illegal substances] So why not go after the big boogeyman himself? Oh, that's right, there are never enough votes in the other chamber. It really does make your job easier having a built-in excuse, doesn't it.

But thanks for admitting that it's all about 2008. The slightest deviation from the narrative that you've never countered - that you're all a bunch of gutless hacks who'll wither at the slightest chastisement from the other side of the aisle or a sternly-worded essay by one of the Beltway Cocktail Circuit - would all but assure your defeat in a general election.

Yes, Democratic purists, I completely understand that we have to keep on pushing for better and more progressive members. Like Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Because impeaching someone who's been guilty of subverting the Constitution sends a terrible message that America isn't a forgiving nation.
Even though it happened once, everyone's certainly learned their lesson and
it will never happen again.
Rep. Robert Wexler (D-FL), who's district neighbors Wasserman Schultz's, called for the committee to "schedule impeachment hearings immediately".

"I believe Robert Wexler is off base," Wasserman Schultz said.
I believe Debbie Wasserman Schultz is a fucking coward.

What say you, Madame Speaker?
"One year ago, the American people entrusted their hopes and their dreams, their aspirations for themselves, for their families and for the future in this 'new-direction' Congress," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California. "This new Congress is focused on creating a great America for our children and grandchildren."
That's great. I'm focused on having hot, erotic sex with Alessandra Ambrosio in a variety of exotic locales as we travel the world, but I've done about as much towards that goal as you guys have done towards yours. Don't believe me? Let's ask your constituents:
A CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll released last week shows the approval rating for all members of Congress is at 22 percent, while 75 percent of those surveyed disapproved of the way Congress is handling its job.
Wow. Thats a lot of DFHs. So, please tell me Nancy, do we have any reason for hope? Can you give me the faintest glimmer of light at the end of the tunnel that is simply the dawning sun of a new liberty and not an oncoming Amtrak car?
"I don't approve of Congress because we haven't done anything -- we haven't been effective in ending the war in Iraq," she said, "and if you asked me in a [polling] phone call, as ardent a Democrat as I am, I would disapprove of Congress as well."
Sorry, I can't hold it any longer.

Feinstein Backs Telecom Immunity
From TomCat for Politics Plus

12feinstein Sen. Dianne Feinstein said Thursday that she favors legal immunity for telecommunications companies that allegedly shared millions of customers' telephone and e-mail messages and records with the government, a position that could lead to the dismissal of numerous lawsuits pending in San Francisco.

In a statement at a hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is considering legislation to extend the Bush administration's electronic surveillance program, Feinstein said the companies should not be "held hostage to costly litigation in what is essentially a complaint about administration activities."

She endorsed a recent statement by Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W. Va., chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, that companies assured by top administration officials that the surveillance program was legal "should not be dragged through the courts for their help with national security."

Feinstein, D-Calif., plays a pivotal role on the Judiciary Committee, which has a 10-9 Democratic majority. If she joins committee Republicans in voting next Thursday to protect telecommunications companies from lawsuits for their roles in the surveillance program, the proposal - a top priority of President Bush - will become part of legislation that reaches the Senate floor.

The immunity measure would require judges to dismiss suits accusing companies of collaborating illegally in the surveillance program if the government declared either that a firm had not participated or that its participation was authorized. Lawyers for the companies' customers would be excluded from the hearing and the reason for the dismissal would not be made public... [emphasis added]

Inserted from <San Francisco Chronicle>

I've had it with Diane Feinstein and hope California progressives are already mounting a grassroots primary campaign to defeat her in the 2008 primary and replace her with a real Democrat.

If this bill comes to the floor, we must pressure our Senators to filibuster, and especially Reid to not make yet another stinking backroom deal with the GOP.

Remember, that with Mukasey as AG, the only way we can expose the truth about Bush's and the GOP's illegal spying is through these lawsuits.  Also remember that, if no bill passes, we win, because the nation reverts to the old FISA law in February.

Medical Marijuana Monday ...
From Dusty for It's My Right to be Left of the Center


Irv Rosenfeld, one of only five Federal cannabis patients talks about medical mj.

Cannabis does relieve pain-UCSD study says

The website Science Daily has an article dated Oct 25, 2007 up about a recent study conducted at UC San Diego. This study specifically centered on neuropathic pain:

In the placebo controlled study of 15 subjects, a low dose of cannabis showed no effect, a medium dose provided moderate pain relief, and a high dose increased the pain response. The results suggest a "therapeutic window" for cannabis analgesia, according to lead researcher Mark Wallace, M.D., professor of anesthesiology at UCSD School of Medicine and Program Director for the UCSD Center for Pain Medicine.

The study used capsaicin, an alkaloid derived from hot chili peppers that is an irritant to the skin, to mimic the type of neuropathic pain experienced by patients with HIV/AIDS, diabetes or shingles -- brief, intense pain following by a longer-lasting secondary pain. The subjects were healthy volunteers who inhaled either medical cannabis or a placebo after pain was induced. The marijuana cigarettes were formulated under NIH supervision to contain either zero, two, four or eight percent delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC.)

Not to bore you with the details, but plenty of studies from Europe and Canada echo this same result; that cannabis can and should be used as an analgesic/pain reliever when it comes to different types of pain and the affects of other illnesses and diseases. This should not be something that needs to be studied ad-nauseum any longer my dear reader. Cannabis has virtually no long-lasting side effects nor will its constant use cause harm to other organs of the body, unlike many of the traditional medications prescribed to people with chronic pain such as myself. Cannabis has also been shown to be effective in reducing the nausea induced by cancer chemotherapy, stimulating appetite in AIDS patients, and reducing intraocular pressure in people with glaucoma. There is also appreciable evidence that marijuana reduces muscle spasticity in patients with neurological disorders. As for the ‘old wives tale’ that cannabis smoke is as dangerous to the lungs as tobacco smoke..bullshit my dear reader. There are also reports out there that blow that one right out of the water…not to mention there are numerous ways to ingest cannabis..but I digress. For HIV/AIDS sufferers, this news that cannabis helps neuropathic pain is welcome since their pain has a different methodology attached to it.

I suffer from a degenerative condition that so far has taken three of my lumbar discs from me, and is slowly destroying the three discs above those. It is bone against bone in my lower back; the discs are gone my dear reader. This creates a problem with the nerve root in my spinal column..just think about trying to shove 10 pounds of shit into a 5 pound bag…it doesn’t work well when constricted and my sciatic nerve causes me constant, debilitating pain as well down my left leg.

Plenty of chronic pain sufferers can no longer tolerate the traditional drugs prescribed for back and nerve pain. The known side effects of just one of the drugs I take daily are so lethal that I have to take additional drugs to counteract the anti-inflammatory medication not to mention the constant rotating of my pain medications to insure I do not become addicted to them. Pain medications like opioids and their derivatives have side effects that affect my body’s ability to metabolize my food correctly among other things. My liver has one hell of a time breaking down all the bullshit in man-made medications to boot.

Which brings me back to the pain-relieving properties of cannabis. It’s a natural occurring plant, and the human brain actually has receptors that interact with it to provide its pain-relieving properties ‘naturally’.

Yet we, as American’s, are forced to deal with a ridiculous set of federal laws that rate cannabis in the same class as morphine and it’s derivatives. We allow our federal government to do this without so much as a hearing. Our federal fuckwits at the helm will hold hearings on anything and everything..but not the classification of cannabis, a drug that has been shown to alleviate the suffering of patients with multiple sclerosis, AIDS, Alzheimer's disease and insomnia to name just a few in studies conducted in Canada and Europe.

Its wrong on every level..every stinking level. And when states such as my home state of California attempt to right the wrong..we get our dispensaries raided weekly by the DEA, just to remind us that THEY hold all the cards in spite of how California voters demanded an end to this bullshit over a decade ago.

Watch Irv Rosenfeld's Medical Marijuana Testimony at the top of my post. Listen to his common sense approach to the demonization of medical cannabis by our federal government. Another blogger is also blogging on the subject of cannabis, Robert Rouse at Left of Centrist. Please visit his blog for more on this subject.

How to Get Through Airport Security Faster Than Anyone Else
From The Boomer Chronicles

Although I love to travel, I try to limit my airplane travel simply because I don’t like to fly.

But if you fly a lot, here is something you will love. There’s a service called Clear, an airport security fast pass program. When you sign up, they do a background check on you. If you pass, they give you a card that allows you to use specially designated airport security fast lanes. You will not even have to take off your shoes (something that I hate doing at airports). It costs about $100 a year. Now, the only catch is, only a handful of airports have it so far. Here they are:

Albany
Cincinnati
Denver
Indianapolis
Jacksonville
Little Rock
New York (JFK)
New York (LaGuardia)
Newark
Orlando
Reno
San Francisco
San José
Westchester

Quote of the Day
From Sheri Rouse for Ain't That Sherific?

"Lead by the force of your example, not by the example of your force."
- Chris Dodd

No Shortage of Enemies -- and More to Come
From Bartleby for The Chestnut Tree Cafe

Some things change, and some are constant. As the Land of the Sheep and the Home of the Tased staggers toward one potential novelty -- an out-of-the-closet transvestite emperor -- Rudy/Julie assures the Las Vegas crowd that at least one thing will be familiar: perpetual war.
LAS VEGAS, Nevada (AP) -- Republican presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani mocked his Democratic rivals as impractical, billing himself as a realist on foreign policy with experience at the negotiating table.

Giuliani described Democrats as "falling all over themselves" to negotiate quickly and without preconditions with hostile foreign leaders -- a reference to sparring between Democratic candidates Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton over how best to deal with Iran.

"It's a spectacle of almost begging your enemy to negotiate with you," Giuliani said late Thursday in a speech to donors at a Las Vegas casino. "Democrats don't get it ... I think the big difference in voting for me is you will have as president of the United States a realist who has experience negotiating."
Hmmmm. "Almost begging ..." I wonder how one "almost" begs for negotiation? In WarWorld, any activity other than mass murder seems to constitute appeasement or begging or some other such unmanly conduct. There's no danger of any of that from any of the major-brand, "legitimate" pretenders to the throne, from either side of the duopoly. I don't know how many Iranian enemies I have now; I do know that every "serious" candidate, meaning all of them this side of Mike Gravel or Dennis Kucinich or Ron Paul, is devoted to making sure I have as many enemies as possible. Thanks, guys and girl. Don't know what I'd do without you.

Daylight Saving Time
From Charlotte Weybright for Berry Street Beacon

I have to admit, I was not happy and still am not happy with Daylight Saving Time. And, just to clarify, it is “Daylight Saving Time” not “Daylight Savings Time.” I was just fine and dandy with never having to change my clocks or worry about what time it was here in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

Our country - that is the contiguous United States - is divided into four time zones: Eastern, Central, Mountain, and Pacific. When we are not in Daylight Saving mode, we are considered to be on standard time. A week ago we switched back to Eastern Standard Time (EST). Next March, we move to Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) and observe Daylight Saving Time.

I grew up with Daylight Saving Time during the 1950s and the 1960s, and then adjusted to not having it in the 1970s, when our legislature dispensed with it. I spent 30+ years living with Eastern Standard Time and not changing my clocks, and I liked it.

Daylight Saving Time was instituted in the United States during World War I in order to save energy for war production by taking advantage of the later hours of daylight between April and October. During World War II the federal government again required the states to observe the time change. Between the wars and after World War II, states and communities chose whether or not to observe Daylight Saving Time. In 1966, Congress passed the Uniform Time Act which standardized the length of Daylight Saving Time.

Indiana’s time history has a checkered past. From 1918, when the Act of March 19, 1918 passed, establishing legal time zones in the United States, until 1961, the dividing line between the Eastern Time Zone and the Central Time Zone was the eastern border of Indiana. We once belonged to the Central Time zone. Interesting!

The entire state was on Central Time, and observed Daylight Saving Time (DST). In 1961, the Interstate Commerce Commission adjusted this line so that Indiana was split down the middle, with the eastern half of the state on Eastern Time, and the western half on Central Time.

Having the state split in two time zones was inconvenient and so, in 1967 Governor Roger D. Branigan petitioned the United States Department of Transportation (DOT) to have the entire state of Indiana placed back on Central Time. Instead, DOT fixed the boundary in a position where all but ten counties in western Indiana (those ten counties were Lake, Porter, LaPorte, Newton, and Jasper in the northwest and Gibson, Posey, Vanderburgh, Warrick, and Spencer counties in the southwest) were in the Eastern Time Zone, but the state was given permission to exempt portions of itself from DST.

Although most portions of the state that were in the Eastern Time Zone did not observe DST, some counties - including Floyd, Clark, Harrison, counties near Louisville, Kentucky, and Ohio and Dearborn, counties near Cincinnati, Ohio - observed it unofficially due to their proximity to major cities in other Eastern Time Zone states. The Central time zone counties did observe DST.

Today only Arizona (except some Indian Reservations), Hawaii, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and American Samoa have chosen not to observe Daylight Saving Time. Until 2006, Indiana was also included in that group. One of Governor Daniels’ campaign promises was to bring Indiana into line with the other states which already recognized Daylight Saving Time.

One of the biggest arguments for Daylight Saving Time was the confusion caused by our Indiana zones and clock changes - or non-changes - on out-of-state companies transacting business in Indiana. I really have my doubts as to that argument. Many companies do business in every conceivable time zone, so it would seem that they would be astute at knowing what time it is at any given moment in various countries and states.

Despite public opposition, the Indiana legislature voted to move Indiana onto Daylight Saving Time in 2005. The change took effect in 2006. Indiana was not the only entity to tinker with its system of time change; Congress passed the Energy Policy Act of 2005, extending Daylight Saving Time by four weeks. Observation of DST now begins on the second Sunday in March and ends on the first Sunday in November.

Today, the arguments for or against Daylight Saving Time have nothing to do with war-time production. In fact, I don’t see how arguments can be made in favor of Daylight Saving Time, especially with our 24-hour-a-day society. Big-box stores never close. Fast-food chains are open close to 24-hours a day. Many factories work two or three shifts. Any energy conservation that occurred in our earlier history certainly has to be eaten up by our 24-hour lifestyle.

One final fact - although the world has a population of over 6.5 billion people, only 1 billion of those people are subject to Daylight Saving Time. Many of the foreign countries which are now the sources of cheap imports do not observe Daylight Saving Time. CAFTA countries, for the most part, do not observe DST. China does not observe DST.

Funny how that doesn’t stop our corporations from doing business with them. And, I doubt it will.

 

Although DST is common in Europe and North America, most of the world’s people do not use it.

DST never used (red)

DST used (blue)

DST no longer used (orange)

PBS Blogging
From Blogenfreude for Agitprop

I know, I know, you'd rather read about Republican sex scandals, but bear with me.

Michael_lisa1_450_2 I've complained before about programming changes that don't seem very PBS-like.  Maybe it's me, but:

Joe Queenan observed that Riverdance, a show based entirely on one dance step, was breathtakingly awful - not Andrew Lloyd Webber awful, but still pretty bad. Despite this fact, PBS is now running something called Leahy.  It consists of that one Michael-Flatass-style dance move but this time executed by singing fiddlers.  It sucks.

You'd think they'd have learned.  But no.  Today I tune in to Nick Stellino to crib yet another recipe for cooking mussels, and what do I find?  Bowfire.

Just shoot me.  More violinists playing crap.  And if that's not enough for you, there's: Mazowsze.

Polish dancing.  Almost as awful as Riverdance, but with more steps.  Whatever happened to The Six Wives of Henry VIII?

Burma Rapporteur
From RickB for Ten Percent

UN human rights expert Paulo Sergio Pinheiro met with Myanmar officials Monday on his mission to discover how many people were killed during the junta’s suppression of pro-democracy protests. Pihneiro, allowed back into the country by the regime for the first time in four years, met home affairs officials in the main city of Yangon and would later meet senior Buddhist monks, a Myanmar official told AFP...The government maintains 10 people died but diplomats and dissidents have put the number far higher. Pinheiro has said he would try to uncover the actual toll…It is Pinheiro’s first visit since 2003, when he left after discovering his meeting with a political prisoner was bugged.

Amnesty International’s key concerns include:

  • The continued detention of some 700 political prisoners including at least 15 individuals sentenced to prison terms of up to nine and a half years;
  • An official policy of taking family members and friends as “hostages” to force others to turn themselves in;
  • Deaths in detention due to severe beatings and others forms of torture;
  • Appalling detention conditions including the denial of adequate food, water and sanitary facilities as well as the keeping of detainees in “dog cells”;
  • Enforced disappearances since the crackdown, including at least 72 individuals whose whereabouts the authorities have failed to account for;
  • Failure by the Burmese authorities to account for the number of people killed during the crackdown;
  • Evidence of marksmen on military trucks and bridges using live ammunition to target individual demonstrators during the crackdown resulting in the death of at least two students and the serious wounding of others;
  • Ambulances being denied access to victims on the streets during September’s demonstrations and private medial clinics ordered not to treat the injured.

Amnesty International is calling on the Burmese authorities to account for all those killed and those who have ‘disappeared’. The authorities must also provide the UN Special Rapporteur with a full list of all those detained and sentenced since the crackdown as well as full and unrestricted access to all detention facilities and crematoria.

Click here to comment on this Blog World Report