|
Interviewer Stupidity - The Mormon
Polygamy Question - Ad Nauseum
From Charlotte Weybright for Berry
Street Beacon
The following was an exchange while Mitt Romney was still
governor of Massachusetts.
Interviewer: Governor Romney, thanks for
being on the show.
Mitt: (all smiles) Great to be here, Joan.
Interviewer: Governor, a lot of Americans
are asking themselves, Can a Mormon be president? How do your
respond to that?
Mitt: (all smiles) Well, Joan, one of the
great things about this country is that we enjoy the freedom to
worship as we see fit, to raise our children in a belief system
that will give them the moral upbringing they need to be good
citizens who contribute to the betterment of society. But my
hope is that people won’t vote for me, or refuse to vote for
me, because of my faith. I would hope that people would look at
my record as a public official. For example, when I balanced the
budget in the state of Massachu–
Interviewer: Yes yes, but isn’t it true
that the Mormons have embraced some rather, shall we say,
unorthodox beliefs? Take polygamy. When most Americans think of
Mormons, they think of polygamy.
Mitt: (chuckling) Mormons don’t practice
polygamy, Joan. The church banned the practice over a hundred
years ago. Mormons are just like any other Christian faith. We
love our children, we–
Interviewer: Yes yes, but as a Mormon,
are you telling me that you’ll never take another wife? I
mean, we Americans can only take one First Lady. What would we
call the other wives? Second Lady? Third Lady? I mean, who would
choose the drapes?
Mitt: No no, Joan. It’s just me and Ann.
In fact, one of my goals as president is to strengthen the
American family and–
Interviewer: Not even one more wife?
Mitt: Uh, no, Joan. Not even one.
Interviewer: Not even one teeny tiny wife?
Mitt: I don’t follow you.
Several weeks ago, during a debate where the audience was
allowed to ask questions, the same issue arose. An individual who
was given the opportunity to ask a serious question of Mr. Romney
prefaced his “real” question with an inquiry as to which one
of his wives would be First Lady. Perhaps the questioner thought
he was being cute or personable, but at this point the lack of
knowledge about the Mormon religion is getting old.
Enough said. I am not a Republican, and I won’t be voting for
Mitt Romney, but stupidity, rudeness, and failure to check
historical knowledge drive me crazy.
When pop culture starts dissing the
dollar, we're in trouble
From John Aravosis for AMERICABlog
There have been a series of articles in the past few days
about how now even rappers and supermodels are giving up on the US dollar
in favor of the euro. (Interestingly, my Spanish blogger friend Marc Vidal
wrote
about this a week ago, before the story went everywhere). Here's the Independent's
take on it:
Pay attention as you watch the catchy new music video
from the mega-star rapster Jay-Z, "Blue Magic", and see if you
can't spot the product placement. It is not a fancy car that he is
endorsing – although both his rides, a Rolls- Royce and soft-top
Bentley, are plenty spiffy – but rather a currency – and it is not
the dollar.
Like so many in the hip-hop genre, the song is a celebration of
ostentatious wealth. But capturing the attention of commentators in this
clip, shot in the glimmering, neon-lit canyons of New York City, are the
repeated glimpses of flickering wads of €500 notes. Jay-Z has thus
performed a currency defection: the dollar is not just down, it is out.
The euro is the new bling.
And Bloomberg
shows that the dollar dumping is even wider:
Kuwait, freed by the U.S. from Saddam Hussein's army in
1991, unhinged its currency from the dollar in May, and pressure is
building for Gulf Arab neighbors to follow suit. Qatar's prime minister,
Sheikh Hamad bin Jasim bin Jaber al-Thani, complained Nov. 11 that the
dollar's drop is cutting oil and gas income, leaving less to invest
abroad. The United Arab Emirates may drop the dirham's peg to the
dollar, analysts said.
The central bank in Iraq, a country the U.S. military has occupied since
2003, last month said it, too, wants to diversify reserves away from
mostly dollars.
Korean Shipbuilders
Korea's central bank this week urged shipbuilders to issue invoices in
won, the Korean currency, and take out more hedging policies to guard
against a weakened dollar.
I took a few classes in international economics in grad
school, and did well, but still, the issue of the dollar and its affects
on the economy confuses the hell out of me at times, and none of these
articles make it any clearer. I get how interest rates affect the dollar
exchange (higher interest rates mean you get a higher return when you buy
dollars, which increases demand for dollars which increases the dollar
exchange rate). What I don't get is this
line from the Bloomberg piece:
Ultimately, if the dollar's swoon depresses U.S. stocks
or threatens global growth, Group of Seven major industrial nations may
have to do more than issue communiqués.
How does a weak dollar affect US stocks or global growth?
I.e., what's the tie between the dollar exchange rate and a real impact on
the US and/or world economy other than people making more or less money by
investing in dollars?
And while we're at it, I don't think I'd mind a good explanation of the
entire issue of other countries "buying dollars." Why and how do
they "buy dollars" and what's the impact of them selling the
dollars they have? We always hear about how China is financing our debt -
what does that really mean, and what happens if they stop?
Any enterprising economists want to take a stab at writing a very concise
explanation of all of this that I can post in the future?
A Boomer Chronicles
Exclusive: Strange Affliction Strikes Many Older Men and Women
From The
Boomer Chronicles
You’ve
heard of ED, right? Bob Dole had it and spoke freely about it on
television. No shame in erectile
dysfunction.
Well, now there’s something called EC. It’s an addiction that’s
been around for years, but today, The Boomer Chronicles will expose it
publicly. EC involves going to tourist attractions and making those
weird elongated
coins in machines and collecting them. With retirement coming up,
some of you may want to consider taking this up.
I remember as a kid putting 25 or 50 cents into a machine that
would smash a penny into a new shape (Turtleback Zoo! The Franklin
Mint!) and then I would promptly lose interest in the dumb little
souvenir. But these EC sufferers love these things. And they’re
adults!
I’ve always wondered if it was legal to destroy and deface U.S.
currency. Here’s the answer they give:
United States (YES): The United States Codes under Title 18,
Chapter 17, and Section 331, “prohibits the mutilation, diminution
and falsification of United States coinage.” However, it has been
the opinion of some individual officers at the Treasury Department,
though without any indication of approval, the foregoing statute
does not prohibit the mutiliation of coins if done without
fraudulent intent or if the mutilated coins are not used
fraudulently.
There’s an Elongated
Collectors organization you can join. They take themselves really
seriously: they have a board of directors, bylaws and conferences.
Here are a whole lot of links to sites about elongated
pennies.
Here’s a directory
of elongated coin machines around the globe. Here’s the list
for my hometown, Boston,
Massachusetts.
Global Warming
Denying Chamber Of Commerce Puts Out Idiotic Ad
From Cliff
Schecter
Just watch this and laugh appropriately at these idiots. In case you
weren't aware, the Chamber of Commerce are complete shills for the GOP and
if they thought it was "good for business" they'd probably
advocate nuking Australia.
They, of course, are cool with foreign dictators dictating oil prices,
however. They also think, I guess, that coastal dwellers' being under
water in 50 years is good for business.
Funny thing, it's not so good for your business if you're dead.
The Bogus War on Christmas
From TomCat for Politics
Plus
It's the time of year again when the the theocon GOP
hypocrites trot out false claim after false claim to
whip their wing-nut base into a state of blathering
paranoia. The following is a Copy/Paste from an
action alert by James Dobson's American Family
Association. Normally, I cite such things with a
link, but I refuse to direct traffic to support
Supply-side Jesus, the one theocons made up, because
the real one has too strong a track record condemning
their ilk.
At PetSmart,
Christmas doesn't exist
Send an e-mail to PetSmart and ask
why they refuse to include Christmas in their
promotion, choosing to only use holiday.
At PetSmart, Christmas doesn't exist.
It is not to be found anywhere on their Web Site. AFA
checked out the local PetSmart store and there was no
Christmas there, either.
A search on PetSmart's home page found 252
references to "holiday." It also found 43
references to "Christmas." But,
alas, this is very misleading. When you click on
"Christmas" you are directed to a page
containing the same gifts you get when you search for
holiday. Of all the items that pop up when
you search for Christmas, not a single one mentions
Christmas or is identified as being a Christmas
gift... [emphasis original]
Let's look at this. If
they do in fact have references to Christmas, then
their claim is a flat out lie. Christmas DOES
exist there! How is it very misleading
to offer the same gifts for whatever holiday one
visits? Should PetSmart discriminate against
Jews by offering lesser gifts for Hanukkah? OY!
Poor Roverwitz!! Nonetheless, I wandered over to
PetSmart's web site to see this despicable evil for
myself, and brought you back a screen capture of what
i found there.

Does this look like a war on
Christmas to you? The fact is there is no war on
Christmas. There is however a war on sanity, a
war on diversity, and a war on tolerance, brought to
you by the theocons on the Bush/GOP Religious Reich.
While thinking about pets,
please remember that I am an equal opportunity TomCat,
and will gladly accept back scratches and belly rubs
under both Christmas trees and Hanukkah bushes.
Know a blog that
deserves to be featured on the Blog World Report? Contact Robert.
She's Leaving Home
From Hector Diego for The
Walrus Speaks
|
Protests Planned Against 2008 RNC
From Libhom for Godless
Liberal Homo
Protests already are being planned against the Republican National
Convention (which some New Yorkers called the "Repugnant Nazi
Carnival" when we were stuck with it in 2004).
Find out more at www.protestrnc2008.org
Folks in the Minneapolis area might be interested in the Organizers
Conference Feb. 9-10.
Organizers Conference
February 9-10, 2008
@ University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota
The Coalition to March on the RNC and Stop the War invites activists and
organizers to join us for a national conference to help organize the
September 1 march and discuss other plans for protests at the Republican
National Convention. For more Information contact info@protestrnc2008.org.
Deceased Marine's Gravesite Vandalized
From Amy Branham for Amy's
Head


Walpole, Massachusetts – In a Boston suburb, vandals
defaced the gravestone of a 20-year-old Marine who lost his life to a
sniper’s bullet while on his second tour of duty on Operation Iraqi
Freedom.
Lance Corporal Alexander Scott Arredondo, USMC was laid to rest on
September 4, 2004 in Rural Cemetery located in Walpole, Massachusetts, and
the site of a family-owned plot. "The vandalism took place sometime
prior to September 28th", according to Carlos Arredondo, Alex’s
father who last visited the gravesite days before.
Arredondo Senior frequently visits the cemetery to keep his son’s plot
decorated and neat. On Sunday, October 28th, 2007 an Iraqi American
doctor, a videographer and two Viet Nam war veterans requested that Carlos
and his wife, Mélida lead them to a visit to Rural Cemetery to pay homage
to Alex. "All of us were stunned and saddened by this act of
desecration," stated Mélida Arredondo.
The Walpole police department was called immediately and a report was
filed. Carlos and his son Brian Arredondo returned to the gravesite the
following day to clean the tombstone and to sand the scratches out of the
granite. The pictures above were taken prior to cleaning. If you have
information on this matter, please contact the Walpole Police Department
at (508) 668-1095 or by sending an email to info@walpolepd.com.
Alex, as friends and family called him, was 20 years and 20 days old when
he was killed while part of the siege in An Najaf, Iraq on 08/25/04.
A second troop who was killed while serving in Operation Iraqi Freedom is
also buried at Rural Cemetery. No sign of vandalism or disturbance was
noted at that or any other gravesite.
Musharraf Shuts Down Opposition TV While
Negroponte Watches
From Boss Kitty for BlueBloggin
Two leading Pakistani media outlets that
had their television broadcasts shut down inside Pakistan have now
been forced to end international broadcasts. VOA’s
Barry Newhouse reports from Islamabad that the new crackdown on
independent media came as U.S. Deputy Secretary of State John
Negroponte met with President Pervez Musharraf.
Government officials in Islamabad shut down domestic broadcasts
by leading Pakistani media outlet Geo
television when emergency rule was imposed on November 3. Since
then, network officials say, the government has waged a campaign to
financially cripple the station, intimidating advertisers and
suspending sports and entertainment programs.
Pakistan’s main networks have continued to broadcast abroad
through Internet and satellite transmissions. But early Saturday,
Geo officials said the government pressured the networks’ partners
in Dubai to stop relaying its overseas transmissions, effectively
shutting down their operations.
 |
| ARY One World reporters protest
Pakistan’s new media rules, 17 Nov. 2007 |
Some independent news channels have signed a new broadcast
contract that allowed them to return to the airwaves in recent days,
but Geo and ARY
One World have not. Geo President Imran
Aslam calls the contract “draconian.” He told VOA the contract
allows officials to enter television offices at will, seize
equipment and arrest employees.
“There have been indications that they would like to see some
of our anchors, some of our hosts, some of our journalists sidelines
- so we can be tamed a little bit,” he said. “And this is not
something we were willing to adhere to.”
The crackdown against the broadcasters was swiftly condemned by
journalists, lawyers and political opposition leaders. 
Ansar Abbassi, a senior editor
with The News newspaper, says he is one of several
political reporters who have been unofficially barred by the
government from appearing on television networks. “I believe we
have been vocal both through our writings and when we are on the
air,” he said. “We had no enmity with any party, but
representing the people’s view, I think this is not acceptable to
Musharraf.” Abassi said despite the crackdowns, General Musharraf
remains politically strong, because he still enjoys the backing of
the United States.
ISLAMABAD,
Nov 16: The Geo television network said on Friday that it had
been ordered to shut down its news channel. The channel beams its
signals from Dubai. Late on Friday night, a spokesman for the ARY
network called Dawn’s Karachi and Lahore offices, saying that the
group had been told to shut down its news channel.
Freedom of Speech is the scariest loss. IT
IS DONE. Thought police and Orwellian behavior promote clandestine
responses.
Let
me share the WIKI definition of Orwellian.
The adjective Orwellian refers to these behaviours of State
and The Party, especially when the Party is the State:
- The political manipulation of language, by obfuscation, e.g.
WAR IS PEACE. Using language to reduce and eliminate ideas and
their meanings that are deemed dangerous to its authority.
- Invasion of personal privacy, either directly physically or
indirectly by surveillance.
- State control of its citizens’ daily life, as in a “Big
Brother” society.
- Official encouragement of policies contributing to the
socio-economic disintegration of the family.
- The substitution of traditional religion with the adoration of
the State and its Leaders and their Party.
- The encouragement of “doublethink,”
whereby the population must learn to embrace inconsistent
concepts without dissent, e.g. giving up liberty for freedom.
- The revision of history in the favour of the State’s
interpretation of it.
- A dystopian
future.
George Orwell may as well have provided
the blueprint for Bush & Musharraf to build their dysfunctional
worlds. Freedoms are threats to their agendas and they will cloak
their activities in “Double Speak” while they whittle freedom
away. 
Both dictators guilty of “oppressive
political ideas and the use of euphemistic political language
in public discourse to camouflage morally outrageous ideas and
actions.” Pakistani Bloggers are going crazy about this escalation
of suppression:
All
Things Pakistan, MicroPakistan,
TheEmergencyTimes,
PakistanPolitics,
CrowsNest,
FreePakistan,
Munaeem ….. just
to mention a few.

A protester throws tear gas shell towards
police in Karachi, Pakistan during anti-government riots on Friday,
Nov. 16, 2007. A senior U.S. envoy arrived in Pakistan on Friday to
urge President Gen. Pervez Musharraf to lift the state of emergency
and end a wave of repression that has cast his country into
political crisis (Shakil Adi/AP Photo)
Crunchy Caramel Apple Pie
By Sumo for Sumo
Merriment
For
Fallenmonk ...
because he loves apples!
Ingredients:
- 1 recipe Pastry for Single-Crust Pie
(see below)
- 1 cup packed brown sugar
- 1/2 cup all-purpose flour
- 1/2 cup quick-cooking rolled oats
- 1/2 cup butter
- 1/2 cup granulated
- 3 tablespoons all-purpose flour
- 1 teaspoon ground cinnamon
- 1/8 teaspoon salt
- 6 cups thinly sliced, peeled cooking
apples
- 1/2 cup chopped pecans
- 1/4 cup caramel ice-cream topping
Directions:
1. Prepare Pastry for Single-Crust Pie.
On a lightly floured surface, roll out dough to
a 12-inch circle. Transfer pastry to a 9-inch pie
plate. Ease pastry into pie
plate, being careful not to stretch pastry.
Trim; crimp edge as desired.
2. For Crumb Topping, stir
together brown sugar, 1/2 cup all-purpose
flour, and the oats. Using a pastry
blender, cut in butter
until the topping mixture resembles coarse
crumbs. Set aside.
3. In a large mixing bowl stir together the granulated
sugar, 3 tablespoons flour, the cinnamon,
and salt. Add apple
slices and gently toss until coated. Transfer apple
mixture to the pastry-lined pie plate. Sprinkle
crumb topping over apple mixture.
4. To prevent overbrowning, cover edge of pie
with foil. Bake in a 375 degree F oven for 25 minutes. Remove foil. Bake
for 25 to 30 minutes more or until top is golden. Remove from oven; sprinkle
pie with pecans, then
drizzle with caramel topping. Cool on a wire
rack. Makes 8 servings.
Pastry for Single-Crust Pie: In a bowl stir
together 1-1/4 cups all-purpose flour and 1/4 teaspoon salt.
Using a pastry blender, cut-in 1/3 cup
shortening until pieces are pea-size. Using 4 to 5 tablespoons cold
water total, sprinkle 1 tablespoon of water
at a time over the flour mixture, tossing with
a fork until all of the dough is moistened. Form dough
into a ball.
Not Reported By Fox "News"
From Undeniable Liberal for Undeniable
Liberalism
British cut and run
from Basra, terrorists
follow them home, occupy
Royal Palace, install
Osama as King and turn
British Isles into
Islamic dictatorship.
Well not quite, but
violence in Basra is down
90%.
Attacks against
British and Iraqi
forces have plunged by
90 percent in southern
Iraq since London
withdrew its troops
from the main city of
Basra, the commander
of British forces
there said Thursday.
The presence of
British forces in
downtown Basra, Iraq's
second-largest city,
was the single largest
instigator of
violence, Maj. Gen.
Graham Binns told
reporters Thursday on
a visit to Baghdad's
Green Zone.
"We thought, 'If
90 percent of the
violence is directed
at us, what would
happen if we stepped
back?'" Binns
said.
Britain's
5,000 troops moved out
of a former Saddam
Hussein palace at
Basra's heart in early
September, setting up
a garrison at an
airport on the city's
edge. Since that
pullback, there's been
a "remarkable and
dramatic drop in
attacks," Binns
said.
Fightin' them over there
so they can keep
fightin' us....over
there. Because if we
pull out now, it's the
end of the world as we
know it.
Why is She Not Electable?
From Snave for Various
Ecstasies
 Or
IS she electable?
Sorry, but I have to rant here. America is ALWAYS at a
crossroads, but I think we are at a major one at this
time. I apologize for the inordinate length of the
following, but please read it, enjoy the cartoons, and
make comments. Thanks!
 I
continue to believe, more and more, that the Democrats
are getting ready to make a historically tragic mistake
in nominating Hillary Clinton to run for president. She
seems to get most of the media coverage, polls continue
to show her leading her Democratic opponents, some polls
show her beating GOP contenders in a national election.
Nonetheless, I don't believe she should get the
nomination. Why am I so convinced she is unelectable?
Other than lefties who really do believe in her as a
candidate, who else wants her to get the nomination,
besides this guy:
 I
think the media would generally like for Hillary to get
the nomination, so they are giving her more coverage
than they give Obama and Edwards. I think the media is
not "liberal" or "right wing" as
much as it is "corporate": what they think we
will buy or tune in to is what we hear and see... it's
driven by dollars and not by politics, as the mythmakers
would have us believe. Hillary would be more sensational
than any of her competitors, and sensational stuff
always sells more copy. There is a greater likelihood of
scandal, old or new, to report about if Hillary gets the
nomination. Think stories like O.J. Simpson, Britney
Spears, etc. but on steroids.
 I
believe the right wing wants her to run because they
know she will be much easier to smear than her
competitors given her history, and they are also
counting on the notion that half of America flat-out
hates her to carry them to victory in next year's
elections, both presidential and Congressional. Think of
what all that "Hillary hatred" will do for GOP
fund raising (or hopefully for her Democratic opponents
as well!)
 The
Republicans will also be counting on gaining seats in
Congress if she gets the nomination, and they will
generate fear in the public by describing how awful it
will be if "someone like her" becomes
president and has a Democrat-controlled Congress with
which to work... of course also telling us to
"never mind" that we endured that same kind of
thing from 2000 to 2006, with 2006-2008 marked by them
making it look like the Democrat-led Congress is
"do-nothing":
 Sure,
the Dems could have done more to go after Bush. The
sorry fact of the matter, besides their favoring stem
cell research in hopes that it may help them grow a
spine, is that they just don't have the numbers to
override the GOP... at least not yet. But for now, this
image persists:
 Some
on the far left seem to want Hillary Clinton to get the
nomination because she is a woman. I don't CARE if she
is a woman or not. Her gender is not important to me at
all. What is important to me is getting out of Iraq,
repealing Bush's "tax cuts", ending the
suppression of science, returning some semblance of
transparency to government, increasing environmental
protections, increasing our research into alternative
fuel sources, reinstating the Fairness Doctrine, and
providing access to health care for ALL Americans. So
Hillary Clinton is a woman... so what? I just want the
Dems to nominate somebody who can win, and someone who
is definite about what he or she wants for the country.
 Some
on the left also want her to be nominated because they
still like her husband. Again, so what? Bill wouldn't be
running the country, she would be. And while she was
busy being president, I can't imagine he wouldn't be
seeking ways to pleasure himself... and who wants or
needs more of that? I know I don't. Especially when I
consider that if she becomes president she will be under
unbelievably intense attacks by the right wing, nearly
all of whom would be talking impeachment from the very
day she took office, not unlike we on the left have been
with Bush/Cheney. I have mixed feelings about Bill
Clinton, but I do believe he would be the ultimate
political albatross as "first husband". He
would certainly be under almost as much scrutiny and
attack as she would be.
 Any
of the contending GOP ghouls would love to run against
Hillary. They would love to talk about how the country
can't afford to get bogged down with political scandals
at a time when "we are at war", while all the
time it will of course be THEM trying to get the
scandals up and running, with asswipes like this
insuring that the disinformation gets spread far and
wide:
 The
Dems have been trying to get scandals going around Bush
since before he got into office, but the public is not
going to be interested in POLITICAL scandals that
revolve around abuse of power, torture, diminution of
the Constitution, or secrecy and suppression... the
public is far more interested in lurid PERSONAL stuff,
like blowjobs and stained dresses... or as we saw in
2006, about members of Congress sending lurid e-mails to
pages, or evangelical ministers hiring hookers and
buying meth:
 If
Hillary is nominated, the GOP has a treasure trove of
negative personal stuff to reopen... shady land deals,
"murder" (according to Rush Limbaugh),
stealing documents, lying about sex, etc. I'm sure the
Republican smear machine probably has new stuff all
ready to go at politically advantageous times. They are
MUCH more politically creative than we are on the left.
Whereas the Dems count on the public being smart and
they try to appeal to the intelligence of Americans, the
GOP tries to appeal to fear, and they rely on what they
perceive as our stupidity. Hillary Clinton would fit
into their general attitude/strategy like a hand fits
into a snug glove.
 You
can go ahead and call me a "liberal elitist"
for insinuating Americans are stupid, I don't care. I
have decided over the years that we Americans generally
ARE stupid. Not stupid due to organic causes such as
genetics or specific regions in which we might live, but
stupid due to insidious things we are susceptible to and
to which we are constantly exposed in our environment.
These are things such as news presented as
"infotainment"and the evolution of the press
into a "corporate" media; our dominant media,
television, being one in which it is virtually
impossible for average people to interact and
participate; the right wing's virtual monopoly on radio;
the introduction and public acceptance of FOX
"News"; public preoccupation with sports and
celebrities; it just goes on and on. In my opinion,
people in America have become stupid because we have
been successfully distracted, by design, from being
informed participants in the workings of our nation.
Thus it will be far easier for someone like Rudy
McRomney or Mike (I Don't Heart) Huckabee to have a
political advantage in a presidential election...
because they will use those factors that have
dumbed-down America to their political advantage.
 I'm
not saying Hillary WON'T get nominated, but I will say
she CAN'T. Not if we want an end to the fiasco in Iraq,
anyway. At least not if we want the Bush"tax
cuts" repealed. Not if we want to fund stem cell
research and other scientific endeavors. Not if we want
to have a better shot at becoming less oil-dependent. Of
those things I just mentioned, how many GOP candidates
will try to accomplish them? The answer is, of course,
none of the above. And even if she wanted to accomplish
those things, Hillary wouldn't be able to because she
would be too embroiled in controversy.
 So,
who to vote for if you are as anti-GOP, or at least as
anti-neocon, as I am? In my case, I will vote for a
Democrat besides Clinton during Oregon's primary, I'll
write letters and send e-mails urging friends, family
and community members to do likewise, I'll put up a sign
in my yard for one of her Democratic competitors, put
bumper stickers on my cars, etc... and once I feel like
I have done all I can, I'll wait, hold my breath, and
hope she doesn't get the nomination. If she gets it?
I'll hold my nose and vote for her in the general
election anyway because I think electing someone like
Fred Thompson or Rudy Giuliani would provide far graver
consequences for our country and for the world than she
would, despite all of her real or perceived negatives.
Her one main "positive" as I see it? She is
not Fred, Rudy, John, Mike or Mitt, whose names lead me
to my obligatory picture of a turdpile:
 Whatever
happens and whoever wins, 1/20/09 is a date I eagerly
anticipate. Even if a Republican wins the White House, I
will still be able to take some consolation in knowing
that even though a new GOP president might well continue
Bush policies, Bush himself would no longer be president
and that DICK CHENEY would (hopefully) no longer be
lurking in the background, orchestrating destruction.
 How
many of Hillary Clinton's negatives I describe here do
you think are simply perceived by me or a few others,
and how many do you think are real? What say you? I am
hoping for some pleasant surprises in the next 6-8
months. Anyone think there may be surprises in store?
On cowardice
From Alison for Creekside
 Since
the invasion of Iraq in 2003, US army desertions are up
80%.
More US veterans have committed suicide than have died
in Iraq.
In 2005, 6,256 vets committed suicide at an average of
17 per day.
In the 20-24 age group, they averaged 22.9 suicides a
day, four times the national US average.
One in four homeless people in the US are veterans even
though they represent just 11% of the adult population. One
in four!
Times
Online Nov 15, 2007
I'm writing this for all you fuckwits out there chiming
in to comments
at CBC that Jeremy Hinzman and Brandon Hughey are
cowards, that they shouldn't have signed up if they
didn't want to fight, that people can't change their
minds, that if they were willing to go to Afghanistan
they should be willing to go to Iraq, that as war
deserters they deserves to be sent back to face courts
martial and jail in the US.
Hinzman
enlisted in 2001 at age 22. A year later he and his wife
had become Quakers. After his application for
conscientious objector status was denied, he served his
tour of duty as an armourer in Afghanistan. It was not
till his unit was to be redeployed to Iraq that he
deserted to Canada in 2004 with his wife and child.
Hinzman
in 2004 : "The war on Iraq is immoral and
illegal. If you are ever going to wreak havoc on a
country, it would need to be justified. Every
justification or rationale that we have ever offered for
going to Iraq has been bogus. There were no weapons of
mass destruction there. There have been no links
established between Saddam and international terrorists,
and then the notion that we're going to bring democracy
to Iraq is -- we'll see if that comes to fruition, but I
don't think we'll see it, unless it's convenient to
America's agenda."
So he did his duty in Afghanistan but couldn't stomach
Iraq.
How exactly does this differ from Canada's
official position on Iraq?
Nonetheless the very reasons that caused Hinzman to
desert are the same ones that he is not allowed to use
in his application to the Immigration Board of Canada.
Hinzman
on his Immigration hearing : "They raised the
issue that they felt that the legality of the war in
Iraq was irrelevant to our refugee claims. So, we were
unable to argue that in any way."
But because he originally volunteered and did complete
his tour in Afghanistan, he is not considered to be a
conscientious objector so he isn't eligible for refugee
status. Amnesty International disagrees.
Last week, after losing two immigration hearings and one
from the Federal Court, the Supreme Court of Canada
declined to hear their case. Their only hope now is a
parliamentary intervention, one which would be certain
to piss off the US. Does the Security and Prosperity
Pact even allow Canada to accept war resistors now?
That protest sign behind Hinzman reads : "Canada
should be a refuge from militarism - Pierre
Trudeau".
Well? Are we? Or are we so thoroughly enmeshed in the
illegal US war on terra that we are the cowards now?
You Ain't Heard Nothing Yet
From Darkblack
|