We'll never claim to be fair and balanced, just honest and trustworthy
February 10, 2008
Click here to comment on this Blog World Report

Barack Obama wins Nebraska with 69% of the vote ...
From KayinMaine for White Noise Insanity

Is there a large majority of black Americans in Nebraska? I don’t think so. Ha ha, Hillary. I guess your campaign can’t say that ONLY black Americans are voting for him, can ya? He also won tonight in Washington state (67% of the vote) and in Louisiana (Hillary, it appears Obama does well in primaries too!).

I’m hearing that Hillary has a good chance of winning here in Maine tomorrow, which is making me think I should switch to Plan B (Plan A is here): VOTE FOR OBAMA to save us from Hillary. Mainefem stated on an earlier thread that she’s going to be voting for Obama tomorrow. She’s another one who is not happy with our choices this year, but her bottom line is: ANYBODY BUT HILLARY. So maybe Plan B it is tomorrow….

What do you think I should do?

War in Iraq: What Is It Good For?
From Tom Harper for Who Hijacked Our Country

Iraqmire — the gift that keeps on giving. Thanks to our soldiers’ long tours of duty in Iraq and Afghanistan — and too short a rest period between tours — America’s military readiness has been jeopardized. Our military forces are now less prepared to respond to a new crisis.

The Pentagon wants to improve this situation by forging new partnerships overseas. Aye, there's the rub. Defense Secretary Robert Gates is trying to persuade our European allies (if they can even still be called that) to help us in Afghanistan by sending some of their troops over there. And for some odd reason, they aren't too enthusiastic about that idea.

They’ve already seen what a total disaster Iraq has turned into, and now they won't touch us with a ten foot pole. Even if these European leaders are confusing the Iraqi and Afghanistan wars — as Gates says they are — our credibility is shot. Toast. Finito. Thank you Boozo the Clown.

Let's see, what other gifts has Iraqmire given us? Ah yes, the recession. Yup, the R word — nearly two thirds of us think we’re in one right now. And 68% think the surest way to fix the economy is to pull out of Iraq. (48% said pulling out of Iraq would help “a great deal,” and 20% said it would help “at least somewhat.”)

The idea that pulling out of Iraq, and plugging up that trillion dollar rupture in our treasury, would help the economy — this should fall under the “DUUUHHH” category. But surprisingly (or maybe it isn't surprising), most Republicans think that pulling out of Iraq would not help the economy.

[sigh] where to begin…

Huckabee Wins Kansas!
From BAC for Yikes!

Is anyone surprised??


Know a blog that deserves to be featured on the Blog World Report?  Contact Robert.

Sorry, but you need flash to view this video


Digital television transition questions
From Stan Matuska for
U-Blog Press

On February 17, 2009, TV stations will switch over to digital broadcasting. How will it affect you? Here are some answers.

Will I have to get a new TV? Not if you have a cable box or a set with a digital tuner. But an analog TV not not hooked up to cable will need a converter box.

Where do I get a box? Major retail chains will start selling them on February 17th, 2008.

So I have to pay for it? Yes, but every household is entitled to two $40 government-funded coupons. Call 888-DTV-2009 or log onto www.dtv2009.gov.

Faux News: John McCain (D-AZ)
From John Good for Left in Aboite

Nice find by HotAir: Faux News identified John McCain as a Democrat yesterday, forcing the question of whether or not this was just an "error." McCain is detested by the righties - booed at CPAC, hated by conservative pundits, seen as more liberal than even Hillary Clinton - but so much so that they'd label him a "D"? It wouldn't be the first time that Faux purposely mislabeled party affiliation . . .


The "chicken doves" and the "anti-war" "movement"
From Left I on the News

 

There's a very interesting article in Rolling Stone magazine in which Matt Taibbi paints the portrait of the Democratic surrender on the Iraq war, and about how "Working behind the scenes, the Democrats have systematically taken over the anti-war movement, packing the nation's leading group with party consultants more interested in attacking the GOP than ending the war."

As I said, it is interesting reading, but it has two major problems. The first is the idea that the Democrats "surrendered" on the Iraq war. In reality, they did no such thing; with the exception of a distinct minority of the Democrats, their talk of being opposed to the war was just that - talk, designed to suck in the votes of the real antiwar movement in the country by pretending to be opposed to the war.

The second relates to the "antiwar" "movement." The article mentions exactly one "antiwar" group, Americans Against the Escalation in Iraq, preposterously described as "the leader of the anti-war lobby." The "anti-war" part is completely preposterous; how can you be "anti-war" when you are just opposed to "escalation"? The "lobby" part isn't really preposterous, because that's exactly what this group is, as opposed to a "movement" which is how it is also described (e.g., in the sentence quoted in the first paragraph above). Indeed, here's how the group describes itself on its website:

Americans Against Escalation in Iraq is a major, multi-million dollar national campaign to oppose the President's proposal to escalate the war in Iraq by sending more than 20,000 additional troops into the violent civil war between Sunni insurgents and Shiite militias.
Not a "movement," just a "multi-million dollar campaign." There is a link on the page labeled "support our cause." Does it tell you to join the organization, demonstrate against the war, even write a letter to your Congressperson? No, it tells you to "visit our online store." This is the "antiwar" "movement" that Taibbi thinks the Democrats have taken over.

In reality, of course, there is a story, as there is in almost every election year, of activists being subsumed into support for the Democratic Party and suspending or reducing independent activity. But you won't find that story in this article, in which mentions of actual antiwar organizations like ANSWER, United for Peace and Justice, Not in Our Name, Iraq Veterans Against the War, etc., do not rate a single mention.

Jon Stewart Weighs and Assesses Romney's "I'm Helping Terror By Running for President" Speech
From Station Agent for Ice Station Tango


That was one legendary log of a speech Romney dished out on Wednesday. It was so tone deaf that, in a wierd way, it's the speech of the decade. It really had a little bit of nothing for everyone.

Jon Stewart can not be left out of the feeding frenzy.

The Baltimore Sun Endorses Barack Obama
From Christopher for From the Left

 
BREAKING

George W. Bush’s presidency can’t end soon enough. Many Americans are fatigued by the state of the nation: a relentless war in Iraq, a bottomless deficit, the bruising mortgage crisis and the United States’ flagging image abroad. So it is not hard to be energized by the prospects for a successor.

When Marylanders vote in Tuesday’s presidential primary, both Democratic choices are promising a new political era for this century, and each has the intellect and the skills to deliver. Hillary Clinton, with her years in Washington and most recently in the Senate representing New York, brings rich experience. She is tough and keenly focused, pragmatic and driven. But Barack Obama, her Senate colleague from Illinois, offers a more compelling vision for the country that he would lead. He wants to forge a new reality in Washington where consensus replaces confrontation. And he has shown a remarkable ability to enroll a diverse array of Americans in his cause, convincing a new generation that it too has a stake in Washington.

That’s why The Sun strongly endorses Mr. Obama as the Democratic nominee for president.

Image Preview

When Johnny Comes Marching Home
From The Fat Lady Sings

Peggy Lee and Petula Clark

The point Petula Clark was making spoke to the war in Vietnam.  Funny how all that fairly shouts to today as well.  Vietnam, Iraq - the parts are interchangeable - though the point unfortunately remains exactly the same. 

 

I think it’s finally time for a woman to be President – don’t you?

The Big WGA Membership Meeting
From
By Ken Levine

Back from the big general WGA membership meeting to discuss the proposed new contract. It was held at the Shrine auditorium, which was the perfect venue because (a) it’s large enough to accommodate the entire guild…along with the 5th Army, (b) most writers spend their Saturday nights in downtown Los Angeles anyway, (c) it’s close to historic Felix Chevrolet on the “big cat corner” of Figueroa & Jefferson, and (d) it’s the cite of the American Music Awards.

The turnout was excellent. Estimated at 3,500. CAA was not present handing out churros but all writers were given colored wrist bands and if you got a green one you were entitled to a free lap dance. I didn’t see Larry Gelbart or Frank Pierson but I did see Diablo Cody. There were also beefy security guards. Where were they during negotiations? Outside were disappointed photographers and film crews. Who the hell cares to see writers at a writers meeting? Where were the actors???

I didn’t know what to expect with this briefing. Similar meetings in past strikes have turned very contentious. Those security brutes might be needed. The pattern was usually this: the president and board spend the first hour selling the deal. The vibe is positive. Then the floor is opened for questions. Here’s where the mood turns. The first few queries are polite. Then about fifteen minutes in the first F-bomb is dropped. The questions get angrier and writers begin listing their credits (as if it gives their opinions more weight ‘cause they wrote six episodes of THE TWILIGHT ZONE).

The membership gets rowdy, the negotiating committee is under siege, and the whole thing turns real ugly.

Since a number of writers had issues with the current deal on the table I wondered if this would become a repeat of “Hollywood Palladium 1981, 1985, and 1985 part two”. Happily, it was not.

From the introduction of the negotiating committee there were standing ovations. It was like a Tony Bennett concert. There was even an enthusiastic standing 'O for the actors. When have writers ever in the history of man done that?

A major concern was addressed right off the bat. Members feared this deal was being rammed down their throats at the AMPTP’s insistence. Was the board going to vote to end the strike on Sunday before members had the chance to vote? WGA president Patric Verrone assured us that no, in an accelerated process writers would vote within 48 hours of the board meeting. So at the earliest, the strike would be over by Wednesday not Monday. That still would salvage the TV season and the Oscars. Joan Rivers is breathing easier today.

The main points of the deal are that it gives writers jurisdiction over new media and a share of distributor’s gross, which is hugely significant since any other formula is just monkey points. By establishing precedents the guild believes it is now in position to share the revenue from emerging marketplaces such as the internet. The deal is hardly perfect. There are a number of holes (which the committee candidly acknowledged) but considering we were negotiating against mega conglomerates who would just as soon break the union, this deal is at least a start and livable.

Chief negotiator David Young (pictured right) laid out the deal. Noting that his background was in the garment industry, a writer near me said one of the concessions we got was that doors would remain unlocked during business hours.

About an hour in Patric Verrone was handed a note and announced that someone was live blogging and would they please stop it. I was worried that everyone would look to me, and I would have to say, “Hey, guys. I don’t even know how to text message.” Rumor has it the culprit was some clown from the LA TIMES.

Lots of people lined up for questions, but they were primarily seeking clarification of specific deal points. And no one shared their credits. I have to be honest. The sound system in that cavernous barn was horrible and I couldn’t hear half of what anyone was saying. And numbers and formulas were flying around and after a half hour my head was ready to explode. I decided it was time to leave. It was pretty clear that the membership is behind this deal and if I got out before 11 I’d miss any street gang drive-bys.

So peace and harmony could return to Hollywood as soon as Wednesday. And will last all the way to June. Let’s hope SAG is able to make their deal without another work stoppage. But if there is, I’ll be the first to grab a sign and join their picket line. I doubt if the AMPTP would give a shit but the photographers and news crews would be pissed because I’m blocking actors.

Peace
From Carol for Peace

Yesterday while standing at our vigil, I fell in love. Some motorists will look us right in the eye, and that moment we share is so beautiful. Even those that won't look at us when sitting right in front of us - well, I've been one of them before. I'm sure that I've been the person who wouldn't look because I had something else on my mind or I was afraid or I disagreed with the other person's message or lifestyle. We all have the same thoughts and feelings, so there is no difference between the motorists that won't look and me.

There we all were together. On the street on a Saturday afternoon, the bright Colorado sun warming us all.

We vigilers stand for peace. And there WAS peace. Right there.

Amazing how it happens!

I can't take credit for the photo above. Larry G. Blackwood gets credit. You can make up your own story about why I chose it for this post.

Clinton, Obama and Health Care - A Closer Look
From Boss Kitty for BlueBloggin

hillaryonhealthcare.jpg Hillary’s Health Care: Wants universal plan; based on federal and free-market solutions and proposes an “individual mandate” requiring Americans to get insurance.

obamahealth.jpg Obama’s Health Care: His plan would provide universal health care coverage through federal and free-market solutions; Mandate health care coverage for all children and create a new public program for the uninsured.

The Economy and Health Care are at the top of America’s list of crisis issues. These topics are intertwined with the Wars against terror, the veterans returning home and immigration. Returning soldiers, contractors and illegal immigrants who are scared to death, when they fall ill, face an elitist health system with bigoted administrators who condemn those without money as lazy bums. After all, they are less deserving. No? This no account, good for nothing, gold brick population has expanded to include some of those same elitist bigots. America’s middle class is beginning to admit it is drowning in the well marketed extreme Neoconservative dreamland.

Here are some very credible Health Care resources that address the NeoCon Myths about universal Health Care:

Health Beat by Maggie Mahar: A Project of The Century Foundation

Mythbusting Canadian Health Care by Sara Robinson

National Health Insurance: Lessons From Abroad

So, there you have it. Comparisons up the yazoo … Whatever the outcome among the Democrats, more inclusive Health Care should be the result. The bottom line is that the uninsured who are physically or mentally ill constitute a hazard to the United States. The operative word, without becoming too humanitarian, is UNITED. quarantine.jpg If the current trend continues, the healthy in America will have to consider Quarantine. If the Democrats can pull off any kind of ‘inclusive’ health care package, it will be better than the status quo. It will not be easy to dislodge the entrenched love-fest between Washington DC and the Drug Industry, Insurance Giants and Mega-Hospital Consortiums. The NeoCons can shout all they want that inclusive health care is socialism. Their scare tactic falls way too short! They can certainly buy their own health care. When the sick will outnumber the healthy, it will be easier to quarantine the healthy. The sick and at risk who cannot walk up to any health care provider and get treated in time to prevent a catastrophe, puts the whole country in jeopardy.

quarantine_lg.jpg

 

'California Count' finally dead
From TomCat for Politics Plus
 
9calcounts Proponents of a controversial proposed ballot measure that would have reallocated California's electoral college votes by congressional district -- instead of the current winner-take-all system -- have abandoned their effort.

"It's not going to make the ballot this year," said David Gilliard, a Republican political strategist organizing the campaign. "The money never materialized to put it on the ballot."

The measure was the talk of Sacramento's political chattering class in late 2007, as Democrats charged it was an attempt to rig the 2008 presidential election for the Republicans.

The Democratic presidential nominee has won California in the general election -- and all of its electoral votes -- in every election since 1992. By splitting the state's electoral pie, the GOP nominee would be assured of some 20 of California's electoral votes, a prize the size of Ohio.

As a result, the proposed measure garnered national media attention.

But the campaign had to turn in more than 400,000 valid signatures by Feb. 4, which it did not do, according to Gilliard... [emphasis added]

Inserted from <Sacramento Bee>

It's nice to have some good news for a change.  While I agree that the plurality-based winner take all system of apportioning electoral votes is fatally flawed, I posted a good way to reform it HERE.  The GOP wants "reform" only in states that the Democrats habitually win, while keeping winner-take-all in red states.

Burma Generals Fire Up the PR Machine
From RickB for Ten Percent

“vague, incomplete and strange”.

“Without the participation of Suu Kyi, the NLD and ethnic parties the people will not accept this constitution,”

“This is a move away from democracy, not towards it,” said Mark Farmaner, Director of the Burma Campaign UK. “It is public relations spin because they are afraid of stronger sanctions being imposed. They are defying the Security Council by going ahead with this sham process and refusing to hold genuine talks with Aung San Suu Kyi and leaders of ethnic groups. There needs to be a strong international response to say that this will not be accepted.”

By going ahead with the next steps of its so-called 7 stage road map to democracy, the regime is sending a strong message that it is not genuine about engaging with the United Nations in a real process of national reconciliation and reform. The regime has yet to enter into genuine dialogue with the National League for Democracy and Aung San Suu Kyi. It has, in effect, banned UN Envoy Ibrahim Gambari from entering the country. A visit scheduled for December was delayed until January, and then pushed back to April. This prompted the UN Security Council to issue its second Presidential statement on Burma, calling for Gambari to be allowed into the country.It is no coincidence that the announcement comes at a time when the regime is facing increasing economic sanctions following its brutal crackdown on pro-democracy demonstrations in September last year. The USA, EU, Australia, and Canada have all announced new economic sanctions. Last week the USA introduced new sanctions targeting business cronies of the regime, and further sanctions are being considered by Congress. The EU is also considering strengthening sanctions when it renews the EU Common Position in April.The regime’s claims that it is committed to moving towards democracy run completely at odds with the facts on the ground. Since the September uprising they have continued to arrest activists. There are now more than 1,800 political prisoners, an increase of more than 700 from the year before. The regime is also stepping up its campaign of ethnic cleansing in Eastern Burma. The UN has condemned the regime for breaking the Geneva Convention by deliberately targeting civilians in Eastern Burma. More than half a million people are internally displaced after being forced to flee their homes.The Burma Campaign UK is also warning that the regime will do everything it can to fix the outcome of the referendum and elections. There are serious questions about its ability to hold a referendum in which all people can participate. There are no proper lists of potential voters in the country. The junta’s definition of a referendum could include forcing people to attend mass public rallies, and then to claim that as a mandate. In addition, political parties such as the National League for Democracy are not allowed to operate freely. It is also illegal to criticise the draft constitution, and to do so is punishable by up to 20 years in jail.“The regime lost the election in 1990, so just ignored the result,” said Mark Farmaner. “This time we can be sure every stage will be rigged to ensure military victory.”

The Burma Campaign UK is concerned not only about the fact that the process is designed to keep the generals in power, but also about the impact on ethnic people in Burma, and on ceasefire agreements with armed ethnic groups. Their aspirations are for a federal state that would provide a degree of autonomy from central government, and protect their culture and rights. There are no provisions for this in the constitution. This is not only a threat to ethnic people, but also threatens the stability of the country. There appears to be a real possibility that some ceasefire organisations could return to arms, or split, with factions once again taking up their guns. If this were to happen on a large scale, it would not only completely change the current political situation within the country, but also threaten a new human rights and humanitarian crisis, as the regime ruthlessly targets civilians in conflict areas.

“What the regime has announced has nothing to do with democracy,” said Mark Farmaner. “It is about preserving military rule and avoiding economic sanctions. The international community must not be fooled again. The United Nations Security Council must take action. In addition, the UK and EU must impose further targeted sanctions to help force the regime to the negotiating table.”

Note to Hillary - Please Remove Chelsea From Your Breast
From
Catherine Durkin Robinson for Out in Left Field

MSNBC's David Shuster suggested the Clinton campaign had "pimped out" Chelsea by having her place phone calls to celebrities and superdelegates. Hillary blew a few brain cells at the notion that her darling little hedgefund manager could be compared to a 'ho.

Hillary then threatened to never appear on the network or in their debates again. Which is just pathetic - on several levels.

Then MSNBC wraps up Shuster's balls and holds them hostage, making him appear almost as ridiculous as the Clintons.



Really, Hill? Aren't we just inventing sh*t to be upset about now?

David Shuster might be a douche. There's certainly nothing wrong with a grown woman campaigning on behalf of her mother.

But, if you're going to put your daughter out there - don't pitch a fit when someone criticizes her or you for it.

Jesus, ladies at The View made fun of her and nobody forced Whoopi to foam the next day about how "we all love Chelsea Clinton."

Give me a break, Clintons. Cut the apron strings and focus on something important.

Chelsea's a big girl now.

Shoppers use gift cards for groceries
From Eric A. Hopp for Oh Well

 

Well, this is certainly not good for the economy. From MSNBC News:

WASHINGTON - Here's a sign of how shaky the economy has become: Wal-Mart says its shoppers are redeeming their holiday gift cards for basic items — pasta sauce, diapers, laundry detergent — instead of iPods or DVDs.

Merchants had hoped shoppers armed with gift cards would provide a lift after a dismal holiday shopping season — partly because shoppers tend to spend even more than the value of the card. But that didn't seem to happen last month, and retailers are feeling the pain.

On Thursday, the nation's retailers turned in their worst January in almost four decades as high gas and food prices, a slumping housing market, tighter credit and a tougher job market pushed consumers to the edge.

Sales at 43 retailers surveyed by the UBS-International Council of Shopping Centers rose just 0.5 percent in January, well below the original 1.5 percent forecast.

The results — based on sales at stores open at least a year — followed an anemic 0.7 percent pace in December and were below the 2.1 percent gain for all of last year.

Graph showing percentage change of major retailers' sales in comparison to January 2007. From MSNBC News

I guess the big retailers were hoping that Americans would spend more of their gift cards on Ipods, or big-screen TVs, rather than than groceries.

The Three Co-Chairs of the DNC Delegate Credentials Board All Served Under Clinton
From Dusty for It's My Right to Be Left of the Center


Remember last week when I brought up the disenfranchised delegates from FL and MI? Well, here is an interesting fact via Alternet, that is sure to have a chilling effect on whether those delegates, now all pledged to sHillary, get seated or not:

That leads us to the three co-chairs of the DNC Credentials Committee: Alexis Herman, James Roosevelt, Jr. and Aliseo Roques-Arroyo. All three of them served in the Clinton Administration. Okay, as far as we know they are all reputable, upstanding people, but if you were Hillary Clinton and these three people worked for you and your husband during the 8 presidential years Hillary includes on her "35 years of experience," wouldn't you feel like you might have some influence on the three co-chairs? After all, the decision of the DNC Credentials Committee will be political; this is not a judicial process.

I get a headache just thinking of what this means to the nomination process for the Democrats .. the fix is in methinks..

Laura Bush's Pet Project - Freedom for Women
From Mary Ellen for
The Divine Democrat

In May of 2005 Laura Bush made a high profile speech at the World Economic Forum and challenged the Middle East region to allow women into the political process and workplace, saying equal rights are essential for democratic progress in the Middle East. She also said that new freedoms granted to the women in Afghanistan, Iraq, Kuwait, and Morocco prove equal rights are compatible with Islam and Arab culture.

Thank God we have Laura Bush to fight for women in the Middle East, eh?

Laura stated, "Freedom, especially freedom for women, is more than the absence of oppression. It's the right to speak and vote and worship freely. Human rights require the rights of women. And human rights are empty promises without human liberty."

Ah yes...empty promises. Now that's something that the Bush family should be familiar with. Let's check out these freedoms that were granted to the women in the Middle East are doing....

VIOLATIONS OF 'ISLAMIC TEACHINGS' TAKE DEADLY TOLL ON IRAQI WOMEN

BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- The images in the Basra police file are nauseating: Page after page of women killed in brutal fashion -- some strangled to death, their faces disfigured; others beheaded. All bear signs of torture.

Police chief Gen. Abdul Jalil Khalaf holds a book cataloging the dead.

The women are killed, police say, because they failed to wear a headscarf or because they ignored other "rules" that secretive fundamentalist groups want to enforce.

"Fear, fear is always there," says 30-year-old Safana, an artist and university professor. "We don't know who to be afraid of. Maybe it's a friend or a student you teach. There is no break, no security. I don't know who to be afraid of."

Her fear is justified. Iraq's second-largest city, Basra, is a stronghold of conservative Shia groups. As many as 133 women were killed in Basra last year -- 79 for violation of "Islamic teachings" and 47 for so-called honor killings, according to IRIN, the news branch of the U.N.'s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.

The women who have been killed have been strangled, beheaded, their hands and legs chopped off. Police chief Gen. Abdul Jalil Khalaf said when he came to Basra a year ago, "two women were killed in front fo their kids. Their blood was flowing in front of their kids, they were crying. Another woman was killed in front of her 6 year old son, another in front of her 11 year old child, two others were pregnant.

After the fall of Saddam Hussein in 2003, Sawsan says, the situation was "the best." But now, she says, it's "the worst."

"We thought there would be freedom and democracy and women would have their rights. But all the things we were promised have not come true. There is only fear and horror."

So much for all that freedom Bush has given Iraqi women. Let's continue...

NEW EXTREMIST GROUPS FORM IN IRAQ
February 7, 2008--Ayatollah Sheikh Mohammed Al Yaaqubi of Fadhila (Virtue) Party held Iraq politicians the responsibility of emergence of extremist groups in certain cities of the South due to their failed performance. After violent clashes that have erupted more than three weeks ago in Basra and Nassiriya between security forces and gunmen belonging to Al Yamani Group, a new religious extremist group came to light known by “Ansar Al Imam Al Rabbani” group in Khales District, affiliated to Diyala Province. The group is leaded by Fadel Al Marsoumi and advocates extremist religious views that call for violence.
Sources from Diyala police have announced the arrest of 11 members from Al Marsoumi group which brings the number of detainees belonging to this group to 28. Officials have compared between the groups of “Ansar Al Rabbani”, Ansar “Al Yamani” and “Ansar Jund Al Samaa’’ who have carried out violent fights in Zirka near Najaf city in 2007 and concluded that these groups advocate similar extremist views.
Shiite religious authorities are examining reasons behind such groups in a bid to explain their emergence. Iraqi Government holds a number of regional countries and intelligence apparatus responsibility for supporting these groups while some observers say that social, political and economic reasons ease circumstances for these groups to come about advocating such peculiar thoughts that drag naïve people. They consider as well that using over power to eradicate these groups might contribute to their expansion.

Of course, I'm sure we can rely on Bush's best friends in Saudi Arabia to keep this stuff under control, just like they kept our oil prices under control, right? Well, maybe not....

RELIGIOUS POLICE IN SAUDI ARABIA ARREST MOTHER FOR SITTING WITH A MAN

A 37-year-old American businesswoman and married mother of three is seeking justice after she was thrown in jail by Saudi Arabia's religious police for sitting with a male colleague at a Starbucks coffee shop in Riyadh.

Yara, who does not want her last name published for fear of retribution, was bruised and crying when she was freed from a day in prison after she was strip-searched, threatened and forced to sign false confessions by the Kingdom's “Mutaween” police.

[snip]

Her ordeal began with a routine visit to the new Riyadh offices of her finance company, where she is a managing partner.

The electricity temporarily cut out, so Yara and her colleagues — who are all men — went to a nearby Starbucks to use its wireless internet.

She sat in a curtained booth with her business partner in the café's “family” area, the only seats where men and women are allowed to mix.

For Yara, it was a matter of convenience. But in Saudi Arabia, public contact between unrelated men and women is strictly prohibited.

“Some men came up to us with very long beards and white dresses. They asked ‘Why are you here together?'. I explained about the power being out in our office. They got very angry and told me what I was doing was a great sin,” recalled Yara, who wears an abaya and headscarf, like most Saudi women.

The men were from Saudi Arabia's Commission for Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice, a police force of several thousand men charged with enforcing dress codes, sex segregation and the observance of prayers.

Yara, whose parents are Jordanian and grew up in Salt Lake City, once believed that life in Saudi Arabia was becoming more liberal. But on Monday the religious police took her mobile phone, pushed her into a cab and drove her to Malaz prison in Riyadh. She was interrogated, strip-searched and forced to sign and fingerprint a series of confessions pleading guilty to her “crime”.

“They took me into a filthy bathroom, full of water and dirt. They made me take off my clothes and squat and they threw my clothes in this slush and made me put them back on,” she said. Eventually she was taken before a judge.

“He said 'You are sinful and you are going to burn in hell'. I told him I was sorry. I was very submissive. I had given up. I felt hopeless,” she said.

Yara's husband, Hatim, used his political contacts in Jeddah to track her whereabouts. He was able to secure her release.

“I was lucky. I met other women in that prison who don't have the connections I did,” she said. Her story has received rare coverage in Saudi Arabia, where the press has been sharply critical of the police.

Yara was visited yesterday by officials from the American Embassy, who promised they would file a report.

An embassy official told The Times that it was being treated as “an internal Saudi matter” and refused to comment on her case.

Tough justice:

— Saudi Arabia’s Mutaween has 10,000 members in almost 500 offices

— Ahmad al-Bluwi, 50, died in custody in 2007 in the city of Tabuk after he invited a woman outside his immediate family into his car

— In 2007 the victim of a gang rape was sentenced to 200 lashes and six years in jail for having been in an unrelated man’s car at the time. She was pardoned by King Abdullah, although he maintained the sentence had been fair

HECKUVA JOB, PICKLES!